What Dramatic Silence Actually Is
When the World Kleptocracy truly fears a writer or leader, one who is too well known to have an accident or be suicided, their tool of choice is dramatic silence. The concept touches on a distinction worth naming clearly: freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.
The first stage is straightforward. Problematic authors’ books are banned on Amazon. TV interviews are forbidden. Yet the weight of public opinion may still be pulling toward the truth-teller, and more must be done. What is a Machiavellian to do in such a situation?
At the second stage, the author receives token short interviews, drowned out by other talking heads on the programme, his message clipped, and his credibility attacked with labels designed to turn people off before they even listen. Conspiracy theorist. Anti-Semite. The good person then spends most of the interview defending himself against the false label, rather than getting to his actual arguments in any depth.
When all else fails to silence real dangerous dissent, it is time to bring in the big guns, or in other words “substitute gatekeepers,” to steal the author’s positions and followers away from his input and trap them in dead alleys.
The true good leader is then further undermined by a subtler mechanism. The censoring done to him is made to look like a kind of personal failure, like when an older person cannot use a new technology or does not use the right vocabulary. In a religious context this is piety signalling. With women it is tone policing. The consumerist society underlays the idea that anyone can make it if they understand the market, so the fact that the persecuted author cannot get his ideas out is quietly attached to him as a personal failing, as if he only has himself to blame.
In a more polite past, hosts cutting off guests, talking over them, and using dismissive labelling was considered bad form. Viewers would complain to the network and stop watching. We are no longer in Kansas, Dorothy.
The Divided MAGA Movement and Its Substitute Gatekeepers
Who are these substitute gatekeepers presently employed to manage the divided MAGA movement? After Trump failed to properly pursue the Jeffrey Epstein connected paedophiles, failed to fire people and get things in economic order as his Apprentice persona promised, and failed to bring peace to Gaza or the Ukraine, the movement fractured. The MIGA Movement (sorry, MAGA Movement) lost its real momentum with Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the subsequent cover-up, followed by what can only be described as a political rally disguised as a funeral, where crocodile tears were on full display and our culture’s complete loss of decorum was broadcast to the world.
There is also the dramatic silence on the film Snake Eyes with Nicolas Cage, which is clearly a pre-programming of the assassination if there ever was one. See the Further Reading section below for documentation on this.
E. Michael Jones – The Trail Blazer
E. Michael Jones has been fighting in the trenches of the culture war since the 1960s. Bots have been calling him a boomer as of late, even though he critiqued the hippies, yuppies, leftist liberals, and most of all the little hats for his entire career. I know of many people who wished they had lived through the 1960s who were not even born then, so the dismissive slight of Mr. Jones does not hold water, alongside every other effort to silence him.
This man alone, and all the people he has influenced, are why we have Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Nick Fuentes being placed before us in the alternative media. It takes three people to deal with Mr. Jones’ gravitas. As stated in earlier pieces on Jordan Peterson, these three substitute gatekeepers are being attacked by people we do not like, and we are meant to warm to them because of this factor. I know they are presently saying most of the correct things, and it is hard to always be cynical at this time. It will be easier later.
Regardless of my bad timing, when they move to help the Kleptocrats (and they most surely will), they will act on their behalf on a much more important issue. Nick has already shown his cards, for after being a leading force in attacking the little hats in so many ways, he has come out and stated they had nothing to do with Charlie Kirk’s assassination in any way. What chutzpah Nick has.
History shows the Kleptocracy has been involved in financing right-wing groups in modern times, from Operation Gladio all the way back to financing the Serbian Black Hand Terrorist Group’s assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary, which started WWI. Still further back were all the Young Europe Movements in almost every country, meant to be unsettling for British elite designs. The biggest of all were Fascist Mussolini of Italy and Adolf Hitler, financed through British and American banksters. One needs only read Antony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution to see how they love right-wing and left-wing groups alike, filled with men who want action and are not so big on thinking before they leap.
Nick Fuentes’ bad-mouthing in less important areas is his role in building street credibility, so that when a meaningful event arrives he can come in on the wrong side with his tricked supporters. The Charlie Kirk assassination cover-up has been a huge mistake by the Kleptocracy and could lead to the public shutting down support for either wing of the same evil bird.
E. Michael Jones’ Works
E. Michael Jones’ works are almost all epics. They include The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, The Holocaust Narrative, Barren Metal, The Dangers of Beauty, The Slaughter of Cities, Libido Dominandi, and many more. His books can be found at Fidelity Press, and his monthly magazine Culture Wars is well worth reading, though it is funny enough the very title that Alex Jones chose to use or steal the fire away in another direction. Alex Jones has Freemasons in his family and tends to get even more erratic than usual when he appears on a programme with a bigger scope, almost sabotaging himself deliberately.
Mr. E. Michael Jones is a Catholic of the older variety, and so as an Orthodox Christian you may not warm to the magazine, which is much more attuned to that angle. But Mr. E. Michael Jones is one of the reasons I became an Orthodox Christian. His book Logos Rising showed me that Christianity is not all feelings, prosperity gospel, and effeminacy run amuck. He has also spoken at Orthodox functions and has been a voice arguing for working with peaceful conservative Muslims where we can, as his Catholic Knights of Columbus membership did not stop him from being banned for speaking at a K of C reserved hall, which had to be replaced on short notice with a Muslim mosque down the street. This is another reason the Kleptocracy marginalises Mr. Jones, for he does not fall into line with the White Boys going after the Muslims’ red cape, but instead points to the people responsible for bombing their countries and then encouraging these bombed-out immigrants to flow into all western countries through corrupt NGOs. Mr. Jones directs people to Tommy Robinson’s past (a gatekeeper for White or Proud Boys in the UK) and his Israeli links. Tommy Robinson was just found to have escaped jail time for anti-Muslim rhetoric, when other British citizens are being put in jail for simply reposting someone else’s mild post on the internet. The British have a fitting saying for this: “It’s a funny old world.”
One would think all other Catholics would be jumping over themselves to get Mr. Jones on their programmes, to help people become Catholics through his scholarly works. But no. Only recently has he become allowed on the fringes of Catholic social media after spending over 50 years being pushed to the margins, as he is not for the alphabet soup groups distorting the Christian faith. He was fired from his job at a Catholic University for his anti-abortion stance in the 1960s. Yes, read that sentence again if it does not compute.
He alone is mainly responsible for anyone being able to critique the little hats at dinner parties, halls of power, and on social media. No one can touch him on this score. But instead of hearing his full message, we get three big names placed before us who leave out what can be done and must be done to win. These three Johnny-come-latelies are now into all the other conspiracy theories they avoided for decades too. Nice, but too late.
If I am wrong about these three then God forgive me, but there are more than just a few clues to their Hegelian Dialectic or Overton Window motives.
Some of our prominent Orthodox media sources have also lacked the courage to study Mr. Jones’ historical works publicly, and this makes me question their true motives somewhat. Some of our leaders are still reluctant to truly hold feminists accountable, preferring to mix medicine with honey. They leave such ground to the Red Pill crowd, which I also see as problematic, having been involved in the Men’s Rights Movement very early when MGTOW arrived on the scene. The Orthodox author G.M. Davis, PhD, in his brilliant book Anti-Christ: Fulfillment of Globalization, fills pages with long quotes from Mr. Jones’ library of work, so there are Orthodox Christian leaders paying attention. I hope to do my part to reverse the Dramatic Silence Campaign being waged by you know who.
Here are some of Mr. Jones’ quotes to tempt you to investigate further:
“White boys are Protestants that don’t go to church anymore.”
“Martin Luther was a pimp who sold pretty nuns off to German nobles, while violating his priestly vows himself by sleeping with many nuns, breaking their vows too.”
“Why would the Israeli Army, after taking control of a Lebanese city in their invasion, put pornography programming on every TV station 24/7 and have snipers keep everyone indoors all day long?” (Pornography is a weapon.)
On Jackson Pollock, the abstract painter created by the CIA, Jones tags him simply: “Jack the Dripper.”
Aside from the amazing historical facts in his books, the key issue he cleared up for me is this: who should one read in these difficult times, and who should one not read? Mr. Jones has firmed up my resolve considerably, as one finds oneself getting lost in the assortment of loud-mouthed blowhards like Bill O’Reilly, Cenk Uygur of The Turks, Sean Hannity, Alex Jones, and the brand new Nick Fuentes. E. Michael Jones’ reaffirming of the idea of looking at a person’s past before judging their present output is key. This is why they hide the past of candidates so seriously, like the Chicago bath house Obama and Justin Trudeau.
Yelling and profanities are not always bad, but truth is the course we should take. Our stooping lower in culture makes us more emotional, and so like the smell of blood in the water for sharks, we become less discerning and have a shorter fuse (please notice the increase in the term “blood sports” being used now for debates). Sensationalism is no recipe or replacement for truth. There is a time to fight and get emotional, but the key to the manipulation and division of the masses has been to use the emotional half of the population to fight the less emotional half, as has been done with the alphabet soup crowd, feminists, BLM, and the housing riots of America’s distant past. The removal of the father’s influence in the family home means more emotive and solipsistic personalities, and those in power can much more easily get us reacting instead of leading wisely, pulling our emotional strings like Pinocchio.
We are all sinners, yes, but some honest leaders put all their past forward like Saint Augustine, or state publicly to judge them by their efforts rather than their personal sinful life, as composer Tchaikovsky did. We do not want to help our enemies with ammunition they can use against us, yet we must not try to appear like politicians grooming our image to appear flawless. If you are spending hours in the bathroom mirror getting ready to present yourself, you likely have nothing much to say, as your priorities for the small over the big tell the tale.
Looking into the past of people in history who give us their deep thoughts allows us the courage to carry on this method and truly see the likes of Friedrich Nietzsche for the deformed person he truly was. I will present an article on him in the future, for he was a key Freemason with an important satanic purpose. Freemasons are sworn to silence on the penalty of death, as gay men are also good at hiding things by their nature and shame.
This is why getting as much of the Jeffrey Epstein facts out into the open is so important. It will bust the illusions as to how all these political people have willingly compromised themselves in doing the most evil of deeds. They have played for time on this issue and thought we would lose interest. It has not worked. We have got the bit between our teeth and will not let go. And they are scared.
Tucker Carlson – How About Young Tucker’s Past?
Tucker Carlson is known to have family in the CIA, not to mention he may himself be a secret member of that organisation, like Gloria Steinem, the leader of the 1960s feminist movement, was – and no one seemed to talk about that fact during her entire career.
I used to watch This Week with David Brinkley on the ABC Network with my father in the 1980s. David Brinkley was one of the most respected broadcast journalists of his era, known for his dry wit and willingness to challenge establishment narratives, including his open disdain for President Franklin Roosevelt, whose snobbery and corruption he described candidly in ways you would never hear from any mainstream broadcaster today. The then golden boy of that programme was a sharp-minded conservative named George Will, and despite his younger age compared to the other panelists, George wore a bow tie and blue blazer.
In an obvious effort to ride the coattails of George Will, Tucker Carlson arrived on the scene wearing the same blue suit and bow tie. Tucker argued positions at that time which would be a pure embarrassment to himself today, being so patently self-promoting and blindly ambitious that he failed in his efforts to become the next George Will. I said at that time that this individual will do almost anything to get fame. He obviously got to jump the queue because of his family’s influence, as he was too young to be there and had not done the time or study to handle the type of worldly people that made up that broadcast.
Tucker’s bow tie is gone now, but I would not be surprised if a baseball cap worn backwards appeared one day, or even a beanie like Tim Pool’s, so as to outwardly be just one of the guys.
President Clinton’s chief of staff George Stephanopoulos eventually took over This Week, and the programme did a 180-degree turn politically, becoming a pure Democratic promotional vehicle. I stopped watching any mainstream political television after that. The original show had allowed paleoconservatives on, and Brinkley hated President Franklin Roosevelt unabashedly and said so publicly. Hardly what you would ever hear today.
Red – The Colour of Blood
Another example of how they mix things up is the colour red. Red was always used to represent the Democrat Party in mainstream media prior to the election of Bush Jr., while blue was for the Republican Party. Then around the time of Obama, poll coverage and lawn signs all switched the party colours the other way round, with no announcement of the fact whatsoever. Why would Republicans agree to this without making a stink?
Red had always been a reference to the left. Communism was fashionable even in the United States in the early 1900s. Then they had to use the term “socialism” to hide the totalitarianism. Then “liberalism.” Always the colour red, until around President Reagan when “Better Dead than Red” had won in the public mind.
There is also the Rothschild name, which means “red shield,” going back to the Hyksos Pharaohs who had red hair and whose kingdom was called the Red Kingdom.
So they switch red to the Republicans, as a kind of handing over of the standard, once the neocons and Zionists felt they had the Zionist Protestants on board. In the French flag, the historical meaning of the tri-colour is red for the mob, white for the monarchy, and blue for the Catholics. Black and red was for the anarchists. Black alone was for the fascists, even in India. Blue was always conservative, and now we are meant to lose even that use of colour from our history.
Well, back to Tucker. He has tried to do damage control on Israel, Zionism, and Benjamin Netanyahu, pointing out that this genocide is in fact “bad” and noting the Israel lobby’s role in it, which the vast majority of the country had already decided was evil all on their own. Hardly gutsy, Tuck.
E. Michael Jones’ book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit is so vast as to cover the history of the little hats, including the communist Soviet secret police, the Cheka, which included 15 to 20 percent atheistic Latvians and 75 to 80 percent atheistic Jews, and which orchestrated the murder and starvation of up to 20 to 30 million citizens in the Holodomor. There was the burning of thousands of Orthodox churches and the murder of tens of thousands of Orthodox priests after the revolution, and of course the martyred Czarist family. The only historical act to match this against Orthodox Christians was when the Muslims laid waste to the Levant, North Africa, and Spain. Even then, in Spain, the Muslims had one army group of Jewish soldiers, which would later lead to the Inquisition after the Muslims were expelled. There is an old painting showing this army group with a Star of David standard, a fact entirely absent from films like El Cid.
The official numbers of the Holodomor genocide are strangely hotly debated and always getting lowered each time I visit Wikipedia, like the numbers for Mao’s Great Leap Forward genocide in China, which was roundly praised by David Rockefeller. Mao being a Skull and Bonesman from Shanghai Yale University prior to the Chinese Communist Revolution shows that the hidden hand had crossed the Pacific long ago.
The head of the Rothschilds had sworn to kill the Czar after the Vienna meetings at the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars, as many a Bourbon royalty had died prior to the French Revolution, likely through Freemason efforts. Another Czar was assassinated by a Jewish-led nihilistic anarchist terrorist group using bombs prior to WWI. The Russian pogroms did not occur out of thin air, as killing the Czar infuriated the peasants who were already suffering under loan-shark rates of interest.
If there is any new revolution you can be sure there will be a reign of terror, as all revolutions have had, including the American one. If you doubt this, try being tarred and feathered and run out of town, and it will remind you of the Red Guard youths in China in spirit, if not the leftist agenda on campuses. Many such people died from the tar, and others were lynched for good measure. Passions lead to evil actions just as often as good ones, even in a just cause, so we should find ground that will allow us success without the mob and the deadly sin of wrath.
It seems some genocides are worth less than others and are not to be found in movies or mentioned in history books, if at all. The present war in Ukraine may be designed in part to help both the West and Russia forget about the Holodomor, which was mainly concentrated in Ukraine. Former Prime Minister of Israel Ariel Sharon, when visiting Ukraine, had the chutzpah to tell the Ukrainian people to forget about the 20 million people who died. Only one genocide, it seems, matters. Six million Poles died in WWII too, but good luck finding a Hollywood film on that. That magic number is reserved for the little hats only.
The silence is deafening.