To start, it is men that cause those in power the most grief in their efforts at corruption. As Lord Acton’s maxim states: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” At the state level Romans and Chinese were both quite good at playing off one tribe to fight another tribe, so as to avoid those tribes combining to go after their own civilizations. The British were the past masters of getting one tribe to fight another tribe so they could take over their imperium in other parts of the world. The Kleptocracy also learned to cause revolutions in rival countries, and of course coup d’etat in others. It is when the British turned these skills on their own people that they went into the darkest of evil places.
Marx and Engels were an effort by the British to unsettle other perceived enemy nations yes, but also to shift their own impoverished citizens’ demands, and their workers’ growing effort to ally themselves with the middle class. By distorting the growing impatient unemployed young males of Europe into demanding world revolution for totalitarianism, again over the moderate forces’ growing efforts to bring about fair trade and a just wage, they could both stymie the moderates and inflame the radicals. Then after starting, managing and fanning the violence they pointed to the radicals to get the moderates to support a quash of the radicals, and in the process the middle and lower class lost more rights for themselves. This is all covered in much detail in the 4-Part Series here on the Discerner, “Professional Orchestrated Riots, Revolts and Revolutions.” These young males’ requests for revolution could be crushed for much cheaper than, say, paying for a living wage and any other basic healthcare systems for the family, and so the Kleptocracy would stomach the risk of things getting out of hand as it allowed them to keep a firmer hand on the population and make more excess profits. This is exactly what is going to happen in our western world starting in this year of 2026 (this was stated in June) as our leaders are doing things to cause unrest quite plainly, for anyone paying attention both domestically and internationally.
Presently our political leaders have all imported immigrants that have less education than our own unemployed males, in addition are religiously foreign (Muslims or Pagan South-Eastern Hindus), and most important of all these young males are even more impatient than our own. The Kleptocracy is now importing tribes to upset the home populations, so as to bring war in the streets. They like the term “Civil War,” yet it is excess immigrants versus the home non-police population. When mass immigration first started it was said to bring in people with skills that we did not have in enough numbers, and/or wealthy immigrants that would create jobs in our countries, and/or those political refugees that would add to our understanding and allow us all to better understand tyrants in other countries. These lying slogans have now all been abandoned, as the inflow of young males from other countries that the US and her allies have destroyed assures these males already have a chip on their shoulders a mile wide.
The economic collapse is just over the horizon and in some countries it is already here, and yet the Kleptocrats are letting in more and more undesirables to make sure things get worse. Only Japan has shut the door to this insanity, yet it is in the Far East.
A Short History of Men’s Rights, MGTOW and Red Pill Efforts
Men instinctively prefer to fight, argue and compete with other men much more than women. Of course women’s conflicts with each other are much more hidden and subtle, but for men to fight women it must take a very long set of grievances to have men finally come to confront bad women. Here is a link to someone who sums this up well: Dapper Dev.
I think presently we have arrived at that necessary turning point, but given those in power have strongly helped in creating these bad women we should not allow these women to escape responsibility, as all women have been crying out for being viable persons in their own right to be able to make decisions and have power, while backing away from almost all accountability. Men have been like hawks with other men in holding them accountable, but always – and I mean always – find some loop hole to not have this all-seeing hawk hold women accountable for their actions. I am sure many of you have seen this, as some men will not see women as a whole as a problem, and would only personalize it to one woman, or see the fewer nicer ones and magnify their numbers to warrant the idea that the bad ones are a smaller minority, when it can be seen today that a healthy majority are the problem. Almost all women will say to other women in their groups they are feminists, almost all will say in the same situation they are for abortion, and so on down a list of things that are problematic to our societies finding their proper bearings and an accurate moral position.
It is with men that we must centre on first to stop male infighting, and the best of those men following a clear moral code are Orthodox Christian men. If we are true to our faith, then we should be sinning less often, in less extreme ways and most of all regret our sins and then confess them to God through our priests. Not every Orthodox man is ideal, but as a faith of men adhering to God and a code of divine ethics there is nothing second to our people on this world.
So with this in mind we want to bring unwed Orthobros into marriage with good Orthodox women, or get them to find a good woman outside the church to later bring her into the church. That we should agree on.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan Report
Beginning in the 1980s, and gathering steam in the 1990s, there was a reaction by many divorced fathers who were not getting access to their children as a matter of course. This had reached critical mass and they had begun to organize under the main title of Men’s or Father’s Rights Groups. It took time for feminism to hammer home the idea that all fathers were dead beats, and the fact that financial support from all quarters was considered a norm only for women, that left such alienated fathers needing to pony up support regardless of whether the ex-wife would let him see his children or not became the unofficial law. Such mothers were often given state legal support in access cases, as fathers had to spend their own funds to demand access, thus putting themselves into higher debt and worsening their economic position just to see their children.
This law-fare top-down effort to destroy the family was first used on the African-American community to disastrous effect. The aboriginal peoples had other distortions played on them that included this issue, but let us leave it to people outside reservations for now, though we might all end up on a reservation in the coming future if the push for smart cities is successful, where the lessons they learned on aboriginals will be unloaded on us.
The last chance to save off what was to happen to the black community was when Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s Report named “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action” was published in 1965. Moynihan was working as Assistant Secretary of Labor, and in the future would be a US Senator. The report suggested employing the African-American males as postal workers, which would give them a wage that would let them lead their families, and thus help with their Baptist Christian backgrounds in making their families less unstable due to their higher rates of single motherhood. Some of these issues were due to no education being given to their grandparents when given full freedom after slavery, and the Jim Crow Laws, many having moved to other points of the north for employment and then with the then-economic slumps not having been educated to deal with the changes. By giving them steady employment as postal workers their children could then go to school and move into other employment in the future, and thus make them part of the American Dream through non-socialist efforts of their own. The Report’s suggestions were shot down by many of the elite-controlled groups and their feminist lackeys. From there on welfare was clearly given to African-American women, thus making their males not be the bread winners, and thus making black women (via the state’s backing) rulers of the home. Just as they knew already from “Sex and Culture” by Unwin, matriarchal societies having males coming and going from female-headed households result in a primitive culture. These women would sleep with many males and thus also have some males lose favour, which led to fathers not knowing whose children were his and so not being interested in bringing them up properly. Later the state would greedily come with indirect and direct control in exchange for welfare support, while trying to make whichever male was present into being the financial father, without a paternity test, and thus keep him paying no matter how much he had lost favour with the mother of the house. Thus allowing the state into the family in yet another way.
Once the culture moved to centre on music, like Jazz, the Blues, Rhythm and Blues, Rock and Roll, Disco, Funk, and Rap for the African-American lifestyle, this sent single motherhood through the roof as it became common and carried no shame or sanction.
Every step along the way good fathers in stable homes would blame the absent fathers over the women and/or state like a broken record. These stable men feared their wives’ wrath, the culture’s wrath and most of all they had the ingrained instinctive need to blame other men over the facts. This is why matriarchal households have males come and go as the former residing males see the situation as less comfortable with the new males, just as the stable males see other unstable males as the problem in causing these situations. Male rivalry is instinctive and more openly direct, just as women’s defence of other women is also instinctively the default position, even though there is conflict indirectly between women.
These good fathers should have bothered to say it is a case-by-case situation to see who are the bad guys and who are the men that are victims, as it should be with the mothers too. Unfortunately bad generalisations took place and the safest claim was to hop on the deadbeat dad bandwagon as the route of least resistance with the women in stable men’s lives. Only when these stable men themselves suffered under these laws would they start to understand how they had short-changed other men, but even then they would go about claiming to not be like those men, as they were to experience the gauntlet of systems set up to undermine them. Such stable men with a better situation would think if such unstable men would “listen to me and pull themselves up by the bootstraps” they would not be in their situations. This of course included church-going men that would claim to follow Christ and want to be like Christ. Yet beyond words, it was only really helping women and children, as in a distorted old school chivalry, where there were no victimised men.
This has led us to where we are now, as men could have avoided the 2 wings of the same bird of political parties, and instead focused on helping other men, and we would not be in as big a hole as we are. Being Christian hypocrites, that follow feminised churches that placed women’s needs above the families’ needs, has led to us now seeing social dysfunction on a grand scale. If much larger men’s groups had been created then, they could have turned on a dime to form food co-op gardens in case of a food crisis, and/or in the crime areas providing protection. Instead the dog-eat-dog world of competition has made men not trust their fellow man and retreat to the suburbs. It is not a case of winners and losers, as much as a large grey zone in the middle where we must turn those that want to change into good men, while leaving the true bad men to their dysfunctional ways unless they pose a threat to our society.
I would say this looking down on good men suffering is the number one issue to be dealt with to build our societies back from atheistic, free-masonic and/or false ecumenical Christianity. I am not saying we need to help the playboys or degenerates, but those that have been mistreated by the state. Just as important is your dealing with wives who cannot stop coming to the defence of sluts, whores and any other degenerate women simply by what these women claim in their passionate words only, for this has been the main reason words alone make those best at speaking emotionally win the day for themselves – with accountability of their actions ignored. These husbands and wives are giving such hysterical women the best of both worlds. Deeds over words must be our rule and tool.
These single mother facts would carry over later into even the white and Asian communities as single mother rates increased as well, but still fall short of the African-American numbers. In Asia males have stopped marrying and dating as a reaction to feminist ideas, and also not having enough of a family wage to make having a family affordable. These Far Eastern societies have had a much longer patriarchal culture where women have been placed in the dark side of the yin/yang divide, and males and females there feel shame to be part of unwed motherhood. There are almost no unwed mothers in Korea and Japan, as compared to western statistics.
Freemason Failure or Intent
If we grant the Freemasons their claim to be a charity group meant to help their societies at face value, please tell me what they have wrought? They seem to have stood in the way of a more honest version of their claims to being a force for good in our cultures, as there are countless other groups like the Lions Clubs that have not been able to stem the tide either, nor have we heard from their leadership a call to arms to deal with such dysfunctions. I have never heard even one speak to these issues as members of any of these groups. They are private and seem to be more of a network to help themselves, and this has brought on the results we see before us. There have been scandals and videos showing the decadent things going on in these organisations that seem to be like those at the heights of power, and so scandals are swept under the rug. Fathers wishing to see their children have spent funds on lawyers’ bills, while the lawyer “Bar” in legal terms has connections to Freemasonic groups going back to the Rosicrucians, the precursor to the Freemasons, whose first notable leader was a lawyer, and so they have had their hands in that pie since the late 1600s. These Freemason Brother Lawyers have not offered help to non-Freemason male victims in cost or advice, but have profited at the expense of their communities. This is criminal and evil to feed off of the decay.
Where have been the powerful Freemasons speaking out against porn, prostitution, slutty women and their outfits that left nothing to the imagination? We find them connected to higher ups, as George Lucas’s father was reportedly a high Mason in the Wine Valley of California. Single mothers bring on an increase in gangs and other bad boy behaviour, as there were/are no mentors to teach boys how to curb their behaviour. It is easier to destroy than it is to create. Why did not the Freemasons, with lodges in almost every large western city, not take up the calling?
Not only this, these Freemasons would get exceptions to the feminist rules, as speaking in certain code words, gestures and/or more directly to the judge or through the network, would get them better court decisions, and allow for statistics that showed that not all men lost custody and access to their children. Only in True Christianity do we help all victims where we can with justice.
The children of these situations have grown up and this has reached critical mass as well, as marriage rates decline. Men’s Rights Groups were not taken seriously by the media. This combined with endless women’s talk shows talking about “dead beat dads” – like the term “conspiracy theorist” – led many men to retreat from speaking up.
Grandparents’ groups arose also, as these ex-wives were also not letting in-laws see their children, and so grandparents would come before courts to try and get access. Calling these people deadbeat grandparents was a much harder call to make stick, so judges and the controlled media gave them dramatic silence. Grandparents would spend a lot of money in court and organise with other grandparents to little effect because the issue was top-down. There was also the fact that these older grandparents would be dying off, and so time would end this pressure as the Me Generation was less concerned than the Greatest Generation in being a part of their grandchildren’s lives.
Finally in the 2020s did the slow turnaround occur, as mothers began to be held accountable in some US States. But the damage has been done and the economic situation will make everything moot, as there are once again large numbers of males (just like the African-American community in the 1950s-1960s shown in the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Report) without jobs, and so the single mother problem will continue as the males cannot become the leaders of the home in the Greatest Depression ever, given everything remains the same with those spiritually deformed.
Next a new dysfunction arose to the surface, as the very young males had become so isolated from fathers’ influence, they did not even know how to date women, and so we had a new false movement arrive on the scene to fill this new void.
“Never let a new serious crisis go to waste.” – Rahm Emanuel (US Zionist Jewish politician)
Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW)
MGTOW arrived on the scene and it found fertile ground as many men had been put through the ringer in the courts and had effectively given up, and a portion of them swore to never try again. MGTOW gave them a friendly group and half-rationalisations for what they had already decided to do. Most of the higher-ups in the organisations always centred things on women problems alone, and may have bad-mouthed the courts, but would refrain from any top-down targeting of corruption. Despite books like “The Myth of Male Power” by Warren Farrell who openly supported Men’s Rights, it seems men that were “not” under the gun would not identify with men “under the gun.” Like those men who were unemployed, unable to attract women, who were close to or actually homeless (60 to 80% of the homeless in the past), stable fathers considering them all low-tier males and so beneath them played a role in this failure. Lower levels of education started to be packed by female teachers wall-to-wall, as I saw my first male homeroom teacher in the 6th grade, and saw at my open-area school that from Kindergarten to Grade 6 there was only 1 homeroom teacher in a school of 15 classes that was male. So males were not getting any mentors, outside of gym class, and hence the popularity of sports can be squared to where else could one find a male that would encourage open competition and not sitting still for hours on end.
Playboys and lounge lizards acting as men were still to be found, and therefore one could still hang onto the idea that men were partially or fully responsible for the situation they were in. Unacknowledged was the strange nature of women who preferred these tom-cat men over the more responsible ones. When MGTOW arrived on the scene I quickly learned their principles, or lack of them, and saw them as a force that was like a Hegelian Dialectic in opposition to feminism, as their ideas taken to their conclusion would lead to depopulation, for they argued it was smart to not get married and have no children. Most men under the gun were happy to finally have a group that was more aggressive than the Men’s Rights Groups, who had been filled by often pro-feminist simpish men, and were always pushing for talk and more counselling, that carried no sanction for bad female behaviour. You should also know women love drama, shrinks and talking about feelings from the very beginning of the psychology industry, so money on shrinks meant spinning your wheels in another way. The one good issue of MGTOW was they likely saved many men’s lives from suicide, as they found support from people that had been through the ringer and all manner of other issues connected to women. These men found out they were not alone in their pain.
The Past Balance
Records show that in Victorian England when a divorce had happened many wise judges would give the children to the husband, and tell the wife to get a job as she was given little money to get started in her new life. The fathers would quickly lose any idea of being a playboy, having to take care of the children much more, while mothers would see that they would have to work to take care of themselves and were often tired and short of cash to give their children much attention and gifts on weekends. The fathers would use kin for help, or have to pay for a nanny, and so the children would soon come to prefer the nanny if the mother did not take the time in her now busy day. If she did not work the judge would ask why, and be less understanding of her position. Thus the mothers quickly pleaded to come back, as even then it was wives that wanted to escape the marriage more than men, and though there was more tolerance for physical violence by men to their wives in those days, there was still exaggeration and playing the victim as well. Added to this was the fact that women had much more to do in the home, as there were no full laundry machines and refrigerators (ice boxes) in England and other Commonwealth nations until after World War II.
Red Pill
The social collapse underway was to finally hit the actual dating market, and here there was no hiding things, as men were not being able to even date, due to not measuring up to ever-climbing feminist and/or traditional hypergamy standards. Young men raised by single mothers applied the same method of “making mommy happy” to “making girlfriends happy.” This catering to women would crash, and many men were happy to be a woman’s friend, and only got confused when she went after bad boys again and again to only cry on his shoulder to rinse and repeat after another bad boy. They had not realised they had become emotional tampons in the friend zone, with only these male friends helping the women one way, as she would not return his kindness and financial gifts in any way of equal measure. They were left sexually frustrated and watching porn. The Red Pill gave these men the skinny on how women say one thing and do another. Simping became a word in the male vocabulary and cuckold came back into usage.
The Red Pill term first came out in the movie “The Matrix” and denoted being a foolish normie taking all official authority ideas at face value. This movie’s fan base are mostly unaware that, in this writer’s reading, there was a second level, as the heroes were simply part of a system back-up, or alternative outlet, for those that want to rebel, but come to follow a staged or fake rebellion still under the system. Level 1 having a green screen tinge when inside the Matrix, and level 2 of the Matrix having a blue screen tinge.
Yet those in power had a problem with the Matrix Red Pill term at first as it was used by the Truther Movement to say 9-11 was an inside job. So the Kleptocracy moved to change the term to what has become a kind of new Lounge Lizard Movement called the Red Pill, first coined by Rollo Tomassi (pen and stage name). They were able to undermine the Truth Movement and get males back into the saddle of bedding women with no long-term ideas of marriage, thus killing 2 birds with one stone.
One can also see this divide and conquer of the Occupy Wall Street Movement, which was the first uniting of left and right youth for some time, who were angry at the bailing out of Wall St., combined with tuition fees and debt for university going to the moon. In that case they used Bernie Sanders to re-split the left and right youth, with the help of the Trump Campaign who brought the righties back on the “right reservation” as well.
The New Divide and Conquer Attack on Orthobros
With the rise of Orthodox apologists on the Internet there has been a huge increase in people flocking to the faith. Efforts to undermine the true faith from outside have been done from Protestantism, Catholicism, Islam, Atheists and even witches to no avail, as their understanding of the long history of the faith is so limited that it has fallen flat. This has left our opponents with only one ploy, which is the title of this article “Divide and Conquer.” They want us to turn on each other and when the divide grows, then move to get part of the faith to be liberal and the other to the traditional. By this they will weaken the faith by saying Orthobros are “mean.” Although this is effete in approach, which centres on ruining one’s reputation by backstabbing and slander, we must come to answer this dishonest effort, so that we can bring in both more males, and also just as important more good females. What we “mustn’t do” is turn on each other so as to meet the acceptance of petty female and effete male group think, where piety signalling is used like make-up to look good, as underneath there is an ugliness that will rise to the surface if one merely scratches the surface. This may be a true psyop with larger operators trying to add us to some form of Zionist Protestant Alliance, but our reactions to this should not change regardless.
All the young men coming to the Eastern Orthodox faith are not fully aware of the technical issues of the faith, even if they like to think they do. I for one in my articles here on the Discerner make an effort to leave in-depth efforts on theology, meta-physics and the history of the church to wiser men who have been sanctioned by their priest to do so, or let priests and monks speak for the church as they are meant to do.
Simply put, we have a good problem here, that all the other false versions of Christianity would hope to have, and are likely running jealousy. All historians of organised churches know when young males join the church it is a great sign. Young males usually leave a church first, when it or they go astray, followed by single adult men, then by younger women, finishing with older men and women being the last to leave or die before the church becomes empty. So to have young males, and have them marry and have children and bring up good families in trying times is a great sign of God’s blessing.
Our priests need to teach these young men the right ways and ideas of the church, as that is their role. Any father that feels these young men should know all the proper positions of the church by osmosis is failing in his role. Therefore we should be able to see any forces in the church that wish to undermine the faith, by their likely efforts to attack these new members instead of educate them, as more problematic themselves than the Orthobros. If the Orthobros are direct and not passive to your lecturing and preaching then welcome to the world of men outside the church. Once again as already mentioned, any man that wishes to look down on other men must see his need to compete instead of mentor as a bad instinctive response, even if that man is a priest or monk. These young men may have come from single-mother households, had female teachers throughout their school years, and have been told masculinity is toxic, and had many hypergamic girls and women turn their noses up at dating them simply because, like all young men, they have not gathered enough skills and wealth to raise their standing in the corrupt consumerist dating market. So the theme in this article must be reaffirmed: male-on-male rivalry must be dealt with, and this will defeat the Divide and Conquer Strategy of these Satanic Puppeteers.
We Need to Not Flinch When Standing Up Against Heresy
Satan has created heresies of all kinds, and finally the tide is turning and we need to continue as we are going to help in our way to win the day for God, as represented in the Eastern Orthodox Catholic Christian Church. We need to be firm and fight for our church, and if the other side calls this “mean” we will have to see this as flak because we are over the target. Jesus was not a Hippie, and there have been countless lives of saints and innocent Orthodox Christians resisting evil. We are meant to “hate the sin and not the sinner,” and so to have hate and firmness directed at evil sins is not in our purview to stop. To be calm, polite and easily dismissed with great sins in our midst is to make it known that we are not resisting with fortitude. Separately it has been the endless understanding of people’s feelings, and being too polite too often, which has opened the door to heresy in the first place. Boys see irrational fear of women’s disapproval as something they have seen all their lives to great ill effect, especially personally for themselves.
Must Men Become Women to Not Scare the Easily Scared
Men are even scarier to children, women and other weaker men due to height, muscles, bulk, deeper voice and facial hair. It was common in ancient times for statues to have Caesars being clean-shaven, as it was said to be god-like. It certainly made them less threatening to those who judge by the outside as they mimicked boys, females and babies. In the past Caesar and other rulers were the only ones wealthy enough to have someone shave them each day, and now it is those with the priorities of shaving over other more pressing issues that mean shallowness has run amuck. Albert Einstein was said to have had a closet of suits that were exactly the same so that he could spend his time thinking of physics, over wasting time worrying about what he was to wear any given day. Deeds over appearance is masculine.
We have yet another example of this when we look at useful dog breeds that have been changed into cute child-like creatures that no longer have skills to play any role in helping the family by, say, killing rats (who still carry diseases, like the Great Plague of Europe), or with dogs that herd allowing only one man to deal with hundreds of livestock, thus saving money, or those guard dogs that defend the family directly. Instead these useful breeds tend to be bred smaller to become toy versions, as women’s desires for dogs that are not scary and look more like puppies and children trumps those men that made them more useful over time and patience. We also have dog fashion shows going down astroturfed runways. The out-breeding of the usefulness of terriers, hound dogs and guard dogs means they will not be able to help the family in a role they are attracted to. While the very same women that push for cute dogs will then scream if a rat runs across her living room, or a fox kills her cats, rabbits and chickens, and of course push her husband to never leave the home ever if a robber tries to break into the house in his absence.
I am a big man, 6’4″, and have on many occasions been told I must do things to not scare others, despite doing nothing wrong. My deeper voice, my muscular size and my direct honest speech has been taken to task by tone-policing women that wish to dictate discourse by sheltering wall flowers from the facts of life, when there is no need or danger to do so. In this way feelings come before common sense.
We need more masculinity in our church, not less. Cowards should be silent about their unjustified fears, not raised to be superior to those that are their betters.
The constant point in this whole article has been the fact of too many weak men preferring to attack other men over holding women accountable, or the institutions that distortedly favour women not being held accountable. Men do not go hysterical when you criticise them, and don’t carry on vendettas for long periods after a hyper-thin-skinned emotional injury. The Orthodox Church should never become fake and gay like the false faiths we see all around us today, as can also be seen with the Pope and his World Religion in the works of the Globalists, for this only means Satan’s victory.