The Steppes and the People They Made
Somewhere deep in Asia rest countless skulls and ruins of bygone ages and kingdoms that the average person knows not, nor cares to learn. Only the most dedicated archaeologist could name them and bring them forth to tell you the sheer endless numbers of hordes that have come through the regions. These steppes are where the Cossacks were born, being simply born on the meanest streets of the world. The list of empires that have come barrelling from the vast wild open spaces of Asia through the narrow bottleneck entrance to Europe is astounding. In fact, archaeologists have actually determined that the first human riders on horseback were said to have originated around the lower Urals region. Given this, it was no mistake that Vladimir Putin was placed on a white horse during a photo shoot, said to drink milk and practise Judo by his Moscow PR handlers, when first presented to the public at large.
The Rus and the Cossacks
The Cossacks were and are a mix of the Rus (Vikings) and endless steppe riders. The Rus, originally being wise to using ships on the seas and rivers in warfare, these original founders learned the need to master the horse to answer the call. Like in Lawrence of Arabia, where T.E. Lawrence said to King Feisal:
“My lord, I think… I think your book is right. ‘The desert is an ocean in which no oar is dipped’ and on this ocean the Bedu go where they please and strike where they please. This is the way the Bedu have always fought. You’re famed throughout the world for fighting in this way and this is the way you should fight now!”
This quote, whether real or just scripted at the time, was followed in policy in defeating the Ottomans, and was stated after talking of how the British used their navy to do the same in going where they wanted and striking where they wanted. Flexibility in manoeuvring is key to any conflict. We, the people, do find ourselves in many conflicts with our governments presently, and we need flexibility to manoeuvre too.
Unlike the aboriginal tribes of North America and occasional Mexican conflicts, the Cossacks and their ancestors had much tougher opponents for a huge part of their history. Tougher and long-remembered lessons had to be learned, but there was still a freedom-loving angle to their lives. The Cossacks had democratic voting for their hetman or ataman (leader), they colonised Siberia all the way to the Pacific for the Czar and Mother Russia, and they had a major hand in defending Europe from the Muslim and Jewish Khazar hordes.
Russia is a bit of an older brother to the US, which the British are certainly not. The people who stayed and lived in safer Britain in the early colonisation period of the world were a very different type from those who risked freedom crossing dangerous oceans, rivers, and wilderness. City types like to think they are tougher, but this toughness comes from the conflicts of a close-quarters lifestyle. Hiking and camping show how people long for a life in touch with nature.
J.R.R. Tolkien points to this in the small towns and rural life as the real resistance to the evils of unbridled ambitious industrial and scientific technocracy. In the book 1984 by George Orwell, the Oceania technocracy demanded a special pass to go outside of the city, and most of our dystopian movies now have people locked up inside urban environments like the rats in the Calhoun Experiments – the well-documented 1960s rodent overpopulation studies by American ethologist John B. Calhoun, whose findings on behavioural sink in overcrowded conditions are directly relevant to urban social engineering. You can see it in the urbanites of our societies in general, as they follow rules more willingly and are overly verbose with ideas of “fake it till you make it,” or style over substance. This is why urban areas vote leftward too, as they are concerned with getting things for free, and allow themselves to be ok with this because that is what city life encourages with endless rules and laws. Women need help when they are pregnant and with children, and thus it builds inside their very nature the idea that there is no other choice. So they have less pride in receiving support from people they will never return it to later in equal measure. If kind words and small gestures were all that was generous in the world, then women would be top shelf, yet when it comes to big gestures and risk of bodily harm or even death, women fall from grace and seem very selfish.
It is well known that men are more drawn to parties on the right of the spectrum and women are more prone to those on the leftward side. The leftward parties offer things more readily. The state is the abat-jour of returning people’s taxes for voting support, and so has become the big daddy of those wanting something, but the state (until recently) knew it had to not have direct strings attached, as only indirect ones were welcome by the public. To feed the growing unemployed and working poor the state has needed more and more laws, so as to gather more assets and attach itself to fewer liabilities. Or stated in another way:
“The more corrupt the state the more numerous the laws.” – Tacitus
People that live in bigger cities are more open to endless laws, as the confinement of ships in the British Navy of the past demanded a heavy hand of regulations. Escaping these artificially created situations is normal and why British sailors fled when they could, and why the Cossacks fled other countries’ dominions, like the western settlers of the Americas fled the eastern coast and Europe. Submitting to crushing regulations is to lose your freedom and eventually accept your slavery, and city folk are more willing to rationalise it than rural people. Women tend to be seekers of comfort and fashion more than men too, and this makes them pull men to the cities. The suburbs are the no man’s land between the two, but if people could have the food, diversity of culture, and entertainment of the city in a rural setting, most would give it up. Yet the purpose of the suburbs was to break up the ethnic communities of the cities, which were a good thing as they provided support and protection independent of the state, and they were a voting bloc to resist government overreach. The suburbs broke up the ethnic and religious communities, and consumerism made them compete with one another to keep up with the Joneses. For more on this please read The Slaughter of Cities by E. Michael Jones – a Catholic scholar and editor of Culture Wars magazine whose work on urban renewal as ethnic cleansing is one of the most documented and least discussed books in American social history.
Being Put Through the Wringer
That the Cossacks and the Orthodox Christian Church survived every effort by the Soviet Communists to destroy them in their effort to restart their societies is a bit of a miracle. Both Orthodox Christianity and the Cossack myth stand as testament to their ability to outlive the hard-core communists of their time. Here are some quotes from Chairman Vladimir Lenin to give you some idea of the unprincipled methods used on these people of the steppes:
“Use both bribery and threats to exterminate every Cossack to a man if they set fire to the oil in Guriev.” – V.L.
“The way to crush the bourgeoisie (French for middle class) is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.” – V.L.
“Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.” – V.L.
“There are no morals in politics; there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.” – V.L.
“One man with a gun can control 100 without one.” – V.L.
We are presently seeing things going on in our own world that exactly match the ebb and flow of what Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin tried in Russia in varying degrees. We will need to outlast our woke version of the world socialist government by not giving up our children, nor giving up our guns, continuing to counteract inflation and high taxation as best we can, and so deal with the scoundrels who have been hired to sell us on international decadency. Does anyone still believe what goes for art now is really all about art? For a good read try Leo Tolstoy’s “What is Art?” or E. Michael Jones’ “The Dangers of Beauty: The Conflict Between Mimesis and Concupiscence in the Fine Arts.”
The British Empire’s New Woke World Order
For most of its history the British Empire has been spreading usury, endless fragmented versions of Christianity, monopoly, British controlled Freemasonry, fagging for a purpose, opium, espionage, and most of all undermining the US as underhandedly at every turn as they could and can. To see this clearly you must look to the assassinations of all the US presidents, and not merely the most recent ones. Hand in hand with this you must look to why they were assassinated in relation to issues of banking and financial corruption, which most citizens are naïve and bored by. The Federal Reserve was originally sold to us, in no mistaken terms, to avoid inflation, avoid recessions, and promote general economic stability and prosperity. It has failed on all its formally declared missions and has only helped the Davos crowd, which could have been its real mission. Any digital currency to be created for a nation or as a world currency will only be created by the very same inheritors of the Fed. I will cover this in detail at a later date, but anyone believing they will get a better kind of snake-oil from the very same families that have such a long track record of using booms and busts to take more wealth and rights from you is as big a fantasy as they come. To see its history please watch all 10 episodes of “The Trust Game” at Truth Stream Media – the independent media operation run by Aaron and Melissa Dykes, whose documentary work on the Federal Reserve and technocratic history is among the most carefully sourced in the alternative media space.
One issue I will cover here is free trade, due to the direct connection to Russia. England had high tariffs to protect its markets for a very long time in its early history, and once their industry was fully developed and readily capable to take on any other nation’s economy, was then, and only then, pushed to call for free trade. Many industries need government investment and support to get up and running due to fixed costs, but any country can never do so if their products are undercut by competitive pricing from foreign competitors and a banking system indirectly controlled by people that have their own industries they do not want anyone competing with. To them it is like:
“Competition is a sin.” – John D. Rockefeller
When you are at the top of industries, free trade allows you to keep other countries’ businesses from getting off the ground. For a bird’s eye view of why Africa has never been able to rise you should read Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins – a former chief economist for an international consulting firm who documented in detail how the United States and international financial institutions deliberately engineered debt traps in developing nations.
When England faced off with other countries that closed their markets to build their industry, like the USA, Germany, China, and Japan, they had conflicts with each openly or in secret indirect ways. Russia was very close to being one of these industrial giants and had the resources and its central Asian position, and so suffered from the EU-British-American elite’s indirect conflicts to undermine their country for hundreds of years, and it is still ongoing. The Opium Wars dealt with China. WWI took out Austria-Hungary, WWII took out Germany, and the Soviet Revolution took out Russia. We are living through the final take-down of the USA presently.
It might be a time to learn some lessons from the Cossacks, though hardly the version you see in Kyiv. Whether Volodymyr Zelenskyy is doing a Madonna impersonation in music videos or acting the part of Kevin Spacey in the Ukrainian version of House of Cards, the real Cossacks are suffering on both sides of the ongoing war. A hard lesson is simply to not be led to fight each other. For divide and conquer is what unprincipled manipulators do.
All Genocides Are Not Created Equal
There is an acceptance of suffering in the Cossack myth as a part of the acceptance of suffering in life. They will take and give it, and not try to have Hollywood endings. There have not been too many Cossack movies in Hollywood, aside from “Taras Bulba,” and the more numerous ones from the Russian film industry, which are virtually unknown here.
The Holodomor involved such a greater evil than what is going on presently with the war in the Ukraine that it makes the present conflict pale in comparison. What is so extreme in the agenda is how much attention this war is getting compared to the Holodomor. You could not have 2 bigger extremes in publicity if you tried, and it cannot be by accident. The absence of the Holodomor from Hollywood has gone on for over 100 years, despite moderate estimates being from 10 to 20 million souls starved to death by the Cheka and their communist totalitarian system. The Cheka secret police was made up of a minority (10%) of atheistic Latvians and a majority (90%) of atheistic Jews, for these 2 minorities were the only ones willing to kill the Ukrainians and Russians in the regions. So when anyone claims that religion only kills people and atheism does not, please wake them up to the facts here. The world media and historians distortedly use the Stalinist term “Kulaks” as a euphemism for the Ukrainian and Cossack population, so as to direct the misguided to the idea that the Cheka only killed rich farmers, as if there were any rich farmers in the Soviet Union under Stalin. The Kulaks at most were one grade above poor farmers and were not even middle class. Well, that did not last long as Stalin wanted to sell grain to finance his agenda and so starved his people to do so. The Soviets had been heavily financed by the West at the beginning, and this never really stopped. So they needed to sell crops and oil to get their screwed-up communist government to work. Many libertarians today claim communism does not work, and they are correct, but then fail to answer for how the Soviet version and all their satellites were able to carry on for so long. They were propped up by the West to be the boogeyman for the western elites to bring a whole host of laws and actions they would never have been able to unfold without an enemy. The key to the Holodomor was the fact of the Ukraine being the breadbasket of Europe, which was and is in the Ukraine, as we are now starting to relearn with the cost of food. Why is there such a blind spot in the media and in official history on this score? What motivation is behind it, and is the current war meant to help forget what happened under the Soviet communists?
With food disappearing in many mysterious ways in the US, and no one learning the lessons of the Holodomor, we may be sadly finding out the reason we have not heard much of this older greater genocide. Is it because someone wants to repeat this mass starvation in the breadbasket of North America?
There were over 40 million starved to death under the Maoist atheistic Communist Chinese government as well, as the population stopped farming to build pathetic mini-smelters to produce bad iron for an early industrial revolution that fell flat on its face. Are people’s retirement plans to end up as the dead birds that the Chinese people scapegoated for the lack of food, which in turn created an explosion of insects to eat their tiny remaining crops?
One has to ask how many more angles of the 6 million Jewish Holocaust must we see? How about at least one movie on the much larger numbers in the Ukraine and China? Six million Poles died in WWII too, you might not know. Never mind, as that is also politically incorrect to dive into. Sorry for the sarcasm, but Hollywood is so twisted.
Two French socialists went about writing a book on all the murders and genocides under communist governments in the world and when they finished their book they were set upon from many quarters, even by one-time supporters. Their book The Black Book of Communism – co-authored by Stephane Courtois and others, published in France in 1997 and translated into English in 1999 by Harvard University Press, representing one of the most comprehensive academic documentations of communist mass death ever assembled – awakened their eyes to why killing multiple millions more than the Nazis in many cases is downplayed, hidden, or suppressed. In fact, left genocides and Anglo-genocides both have had the same efforts used to cover over their greater numbers of evil. The British oligarchy starved the Indians by the millions several times. The Irish had food removed from their country as they starved. The British elite were the first to use concentration camps against the Dutch Boers in South Africa. By the way, “boer” in Afrikaans means farmer.
What Cossacks represent at their core is the blend of a cowboy and a soldier, and the ugliness of war does not come to disturb the myths that surround the Cossack so easily. The long history of war on the Eurasian steppes means there has been a constant need to improve on how to make war, not by choice but by necessity in the face of the evilness of the ambitious.
The Ukrainians are led by a corrupt Jewish mafia cabal connected to the western NATO forces and elites, and have their most militant Nazi-like soldiers in the Azov Brigades. The huge funds given to the Ukrainians for war have been found to have been transferred to Israel. So we strangely have a Jewish-Fascist alliance again. If you know about George Soros’ personal history you will know this is not the first time this has happened, and will not be the last. Many heads of neo-Nazi organisations in the US have been found to be headed by crypto-Jews, and getting Christians to give up their religion to be white boys is much better for the left, as they have been saying there are fascists under every rock. This has been done before too, but that is for another day.
The esprit de corps of both sides of the Ukraine-Russia War is hinging on the old roots of the Cossack legends. The Russians appear to be clearly winning this war, if one looks at the maps and completely ignores the western media. In the public relations war Hollywood has the Ukraine winning, but it is all illusions and soon the end will come as a shock to the normies.
Crystal Ball or Knowing History
To know Russia is to understand its hard lessons. One old saying is: Russia is the knight (or Cossack) and the Ukraine is its stallion. I was teaching a large group of officers of an Asian country army the English language when the Maidan Revolution of 2014 occurred in the Ukraine (a better title would be a western-supported coup). I asked the officers their opinion of the situation then, and all had a version carried by the MSM news at the time. I showed my historical study by quoting the above old Russian saying and went out on a limb and said that the Russians will go to war over this, for the Ukraine is too important to the Russians and they know this in their bones. The faces of the officers looked like I was a foolish English teacher to state such an aggressive idea to professional men in the industry of making war. It took time to come into being, but I am likely one of the few that was not surprised by this war at all. The Russians were simply biding their time. Patience and long-term thinking is not foreign to them, as is winning by attrition.
The old Novgorodian Rus, who were the beginnings of what was to become the Russian state after the fall of Kiev to the Mongols, fought a huge battle on a lake and destroyed the Teutonic Knights. Right after that they then submitted to the Mongol yoke and became a vassal state of the Golden Horde. How far-sighted is that, as most would have been carried away with victory over the Teutons to then submit one’s kingdom with troops so high in morale. Yet this is the steppes, and they knew and know of how many kingdoms have come and gone and been forgotten by most.
Later in history the Cossack kingdoms in the Ukraine region chose to join with Russia, as they were both Orthodox Christians and they had felt the whip of Polish-Lithuanian Catholic leadership and their Jewish tax collectors, and had defeated them in battle. This Polish-Lithuanian government was to later fall from inner weakness and corruption, and so we should take note of why this happened too. Unite where you can or suffer for arrogance. This lesson was lost in England when Harold Godwinson fought the Vikings in the north and then tried, without pause, to defeat William the Bastard and the Normans.
Here are some sayings of the Rus and Cossacks to show their more stoic ideas:
“One in the field is not a Warrior.” (The opposite idea to what Hollywood sells, where the lone wolf can defeat all.)
“Living with wolves means to howl like a wolf.” (A greater tolerance for what war means.)
“You cannot help grief with tears.”
“An old friend is better than 2 new ones.”
“Each sandpiper praises its swamp.”
“Bitter truth is better than sweet lies.”
“A well-fed man does not understand a starving one.”
“You see your friends in times of trouble.”
“Don’t wave your fists after a fight.”
“Eggs do not teach the chicken.”
“Husband is a head, wife is a neck.”
“A Russian harnesses slowly, but rides fast.”
“The child of seven nannies has no eye.” (Too many cooks spoil the broth.)
“Truth pricks eyes.” (Truth is very hurtful.)
“The ocean comes up to a drunk man’s knees, but a puddle comes up to his ears.” (A drunk man will walk until water is up to his knees before noticing, and also falls in mere puddles face down, because he is a fool in the end.)
“Free cheese is only in a mouse trap.”
Many Russian Czars were too harsh, but they had much rope to hang themselves with, for the people of that region know they need a harsh leader on the steppes, for this is not the prairie of North America where the tribe’s braves would leave their war party when they felt like it.
The horse as a means for war is gone, but the rider of the whirlwind of war is still there, and he does not follow fashion and is wise to the undermining of his culture.
The Philosophical Metaphor of the Rider and the Horse in Antiquity
For those of you who have bothered to read thus far in Part 2 of this article, I have saved the best for last. The Horse and the Rider is a classical metaphor used in ancient times to teach people a simple philosophy for their lives. It does not need a degree or costly sessions. It only needs a person of strength to follow the way of the Rider. This is one important reason it was one of the first things removed from the education system in the 1940s, when the Classics were cleared out.
The horse represents passion and emotions. Whether the horse gallops off in all directions, or acts stubbornly like a mule and refuses to move anywhere, the results are the same: emotions rule.
The spurs, reins, saddle, bit, and whip are the Will that controls the horse. This represents self-discipline or force of character and has to do with controlling your judgement too. Dictators have a strong Will but have none to little reason outside of gaining power over others, and so the control for power is confused and messed up in emotional ways and is filled with hypocrisy. This limited Will has no logic to lead the horse and the rider in any clear thoughtful way, beyond over-hitting and over-controlling the horse or people, and using other people’s horses or emotions. An upside-down personality will use the Will to follow their desires no matter what it takes. Imagine a drug addict that will rob his grandmother for some drugs, and thus wills himself to beat her to get money. He may have doubts, but uses his evil will and discipline to get his desire no matter what he has to do.
The Rider represents thinking, reason, and logic. Yet if the Rider lacks the Will because of vices or is afraid of countless things, then the Rider is unable to control his emotions or the horse, for his fears trump his thinking. Knowing the way and acting to reach the way involves controlling temptations, events, and others you let into your life, but most of all yourself. Also very weak persons will make out their desires are logical, so as to ride the horse where it wants to go, but as you do so and make excuses that you want to go where the horse desires, you become not a Rider but a Horse that rides you. There is no way to change riding, only who will lead. One can see this when one sees dogs whose owners lack both will and logic in controlling their pets.
So ideally and simplified:
1st – Logic
2nd – Will
3rd – Emotions
The Inversion of the Shrinks
Psychology has some good aspects, but much of it is more problematic than good, and even has an evilness to it. Psychology turns this classical Rider and the Horse idea upside-down. The suppression of emotions is bad to shrinks, as it causes frustration, so you should follow your dreams of passion or desires even if they are not good for you. They never outwardly say so, nor clearly give a judgement, and so usually just listen and imply through questions with no judgements. Today “judgmentalism” is a negative term. Still the dice are cast by shrinks and their followers. Most passions are vices and should always be suppressed to reach greater goals. Instead, the importance of this great saying is lost: “A man has as many masters as vices.” Instead, the trained psychologist thinks you can become liberated by following your emotional vices and good passions alike, as there are no moral judgements anymore, as there is no god to make them. Most importantly to those in power, you become a slave to the man who controls your vices. This is why people are being encouraged to follow their emotions by the falsely created culture.
Your powerful Will can then be wrongly used to buck social morality, or bravely move past your guilt to do what your passion desires. Life has no problems with a person doing their good passions, such as creating beautiful art or loving your good family members, only with vices. So shrinks used to give you a patriarchal figure in a tweed coat, beard, and pipe who allows you to follow your vices wherever they lead, which is always to faster destruction.
Lust, gluttony, pride, greed, wrath, sloth, and envy are the 7 deadly sins and are all vices. Dreams are often filled with animalistic primitive desires and are not profound insights. Women dream more than men, and women often fear doing things, and so dreams allow them outlets for adventure they would otherwise not pursue. So ignoring parental warnings, older social norms, and religious warnings about vices leading to disaster, too many instead follow the shrinks, pop stars, and TV gurus to a wasted life, which is what we see all around us. It is your choice, but do not use the evilly created pseudo-science to say it is good.
Logic, which comes last in such weak people, is then used to rationalise the pursuit of emotions, or is used to blame their problems on others. With one being inhibited one can now be slutty, druggy, corrupt, fat, etc., and it is the self-controlled person that is labelled anal, uptight, and thinks too much. Often sold with terms like being cool and hip, as you become sheeple to your vices. Vices are big issues and should never be compared to small ones, as some of the most vice-riddled people will use petty small issues to run them cover for lives of debauchery. Take it from someone that is aware of making judgements, and that is not an uptight-creating thing but a very relaxed way to live one’s life. Uptightness comes from fear and doublethink, not from timely judgements and actions. Uptightness comes from endless fears and the cover of appearing to look good on the outside as one’s inside is a mess. Jordan Peterson’s claim to “make your bed” was an appeal to women who want to have their boys do as told about such small things. I would like my boy to be neater, but hardly say a word on his bed. Yet have him let a vice go unchecked, or behave dishonourably to a friend? Then the house will not be quiet for the neighbours or my wife, who wants to not go to the mats on such an issue that emotionally is too hard to stop. Such are the ways of good men.
Therefore, the order of this Inversion of the Shrinks is simplified into:
1st – Emotions (id)
2nd – Will (ego)
3rd – Logic (super ego)
Shrinks do not call things by their accurate names but call them super ego (logic), ego (will), and id (emotions). By encouraging people to follow the id, practitioners falsely argue it has deep meaning, instead of being a crass animalistic spastic outlet for the brain’s neurons, or is demon influenced or God influenced. An Orthodox Priest can help you to see which one it is if it troubles you, not one of the 90% of female shrinks who make up the profession today and will likely give you an effete solipsistic answer mixed with her personal mood of that day’s opinion. In primitive times if you were chased in your dreams by something you were bound to jump and run faster in your real life, as you became more skittish. If you had sex with women in your dreams you were more likely to be more obsessed with sex and have your genes carry on. So dreams helped evolutionarily but were not deep or insightful to anyone but those unable to act in real life out of fear or lust. To leave the deeply flawed ideas of evolution behind, you rise to the higher level of morality in God. Sometimes you do not run, and do not have sex with a slut. Losers rationalise the id or emotions with logical falsities.
Today few can afford shrinks, but many read new age authors who are gurus, TV and SMS talking heads who are gurus, or follow friends who follow gurus. Such people have their real fathers and mothers, who could usually tell better advice (if unable to follow it themselves), but many people prefer the company of people that tell them what they want to hear.
All the first shrinks started with 95% women clients, and often had sex with them. This is clearly unprofessional, but Freud used these facts to keep other followers in line as blackmail. In fact, this whole profession is like a confession for atheists or Protestants. Instead of a priest hearing a mix of emotions and telling the troubled person some moral advice and to control the worst desires, they get someone who profits from more sessions and then lets you follow your desires with little to no moral judgements, likely to cause more problems and more sessions to feel better about your lack of a wilful Rider of the Horse.
The powers of this world know this, and so we have a process of dysfunctional ideas for the population to make them more controllable with corruption. A liar, for example, cannot complain about the biggest of liars of those in power. They are just better at what the small liar does. As covered in the Izzat article, the Pagan Indians have a distorted form of honour called “Izzat,” and it reflects some of the Asian “loss of face” issue. It does not work and will never work, for it reeks of pride, which is said to be the root of all other vices. Izzat is not honour greater than pride, but pride greater than honour.
This is the key to Know Thyself.
“A man has as many masters as he has vices.” – Saint Augustine
Most wise and brave men will use their spurs when needed and follow the old philosophical ideas of the ancient teaching of the Horse and Rider. Be a man, better, be an Orthodox Christian cowboy or Cossack and find others and work together, or die together, or hang separately. Jesus Christ, as the begotten God, shows us one may be called to sacrifice for one’s ideas, not emotionally do what everyone else is doing to live another day, for as a vice-filled slave, your Kleptocratic masters control your vices and will kill you at Satan’s convenience. God wants you to be a sheep to God and His faith only, and be as wise as a serpent to see evil and its traps, and a lion-male to deal with cowards and the vices of cowards. God gave you free will, so the choice is yours, as is your accountability.
Honour With or Without U.