“A fox is wise and can evade traps, but is susceptible to a pack of wolves, yet wolves cannot handle a lion, but a lion cannot avoid traps.” – Niccolò Machiavelli
Turning Sycophants Into False Heroes for the Public
Well, the perfect situation arrived on my lap. I thought I had laid waste to Jordan Peterson with the article here on The Discerner named “Pinocchio – How Jordan Peterson Turns Boys Into Emotional Puppets,” but after Jordan’s supposed drama-filled nervous breakdown, and/or possible conversion to Christianity, and/or being on his deathbed, I saw his new lecture on Friedrich Nietzsche being plugged by internet sources. Someone is playing the sympathy card in a PR game with us on Jordan’s behalf. Still, the stars have aligned here, as I have been burning the midnight oil studying Nietzsche for some years. So Jordan will help bring this effort up to date so as to be more attractive to those that shy away from history and are into Jordan’s psychological shrink-fests.
As can be seen in the header to this article, the young Friedrich Nietzsche had his hand in his suit jacket for that old photograph, which is well known to represent the hidden hand gesture connected with Freemasonry and the occult groups. Such photos at that time were rare and expensive, and Friedrich was from a poor family, so some wealthy man seems to have paid for it. Fred is indoors in this photo and it is not cold, so I must trouble those normies – who are also unable to see the one-eye gestures on many a magazine and screenshot today, having the very same purpose of the all-seeing eye – with this observation. If you search on Google to see if Nietzsche had Freemason membership, you will get dismissals out of hand, even countering the hand-in-coat fact with “ignore your lying eyes,” and you will be labelled a “conspiracy theorist.” Fortunately those Spanish-speaking Freemasons in Argentina never did get the memo on this, and you can see him clearly on their list of Freemasons on the Grand Lodge of Argentina. There are also other interesting people on the list that one would not normally hear of, so c’est la vie.
The Kleptocracy wants the confused atheistic masses to see Friedrich Nietzsche – to be referred to at times in this article as Loser Fred – as a deep-thinking hero. During his life, news reports would give him bad press, as some powerful and rich persons of that time wanted his ideas out in the public sphere and not to be ignored in obscurity. The same was done to Aleister Crowley, as bad press is better than no press to the supposedly “Most Wicked Man in the World.” How can any man like Loser Fred – who was dying of syphilis for many years, which is well known by doctors to cause fits of megalomania in those suffering from the disease – be raised to the heights of public importance in the 1800s, when most sufferers of such a disease at the time wanted to die in shame from their whoring ways? Let us dive into the real Nietzsche to see how brave he really was, or was not.
Friedrich’s Early Years
Like all boys with a stronger tendency to have sexual identity problems, Friedrich lost his father early. He then had to take on the role of the father of the household in the then-Prussian Kingdom, for at that time it was a truly patriarchal one in the Fatherland. Nietzsche was also a sickly boy, which often means being in bed or at least indoors due to a mother’s worries, and so forced him to find different avenues for his boyish energy. As has been done in surveys to measure horoscope significance, boys born in the spring and have all summer and autumn to grow healthy before winter sets in tend to show up in noticeably unnatural larger numbers in the Olympics, while boys born in colder weather periods tended to be lower in physical activity and in addition tend to be more bookish. This is a very rough generalization, as I was born in the spring and am both athletic and a bit of a big bookworm. At that time in history, winter months would also mean a weaker diet, and given Nietzsche’s family poverty, this would have left his mother finding it difficult to find healthy food in winter. So if we add these facts – no father, sickly nature, poverty, late-in-the-year birth, and likely a poorer diet – we can see that the boaster of being able to overcome setbacks by “force of will” can be seen in some form of truth in his background. Unfortunately we can also see the makings of problems related to his situation that other biographers seem oblivious to, or wish to hide.
Friedrich Nietzsche was born on October 15th 1844, and named after Friedrich Wilhelm IV of Prussia, which placed a high ambition in him, and so likely he had many youthful German dreams of being a leader, a warrior, and being highly decorated in battle. His father had been a teacher and pastor, and so his absence would fit the bill of fatherless boys more often becoming atheists, as is an aspect of note in many books written by Christians. His father died when he was five years old from a brain disease, and so points to a possible genetic abnormality – regardless, there would have been little influence to be had by his father at that age, and thus made Friedrich a boy looking for father figures as a replacement. He was put in charge of his mother and younger sister rather quickly compared to modern trends. He had a younger brother who had died very young, and so that had no large bearing on his responsibilities. These family responsibilities likely postponed any rebellious stage, as his good school marks meant academics was not an issue to rebel against, at least until later in life when he did break the mold of normalcy big time. For Fred’s whole academic career he had great marks, but again it must be remembered that it was under the Prussian Educational System he succeeded, and that has been introduced to most nations of the West – and even East – to our destruction, which is covered in “The Destruction of Education – Parts 1, 2 and 3” here on The Discerner.
Failure in Military Service
In 1867, Nietzsche signed up for the Prussian Artillery as a volunteer in a division in Naumburg. He was initially regarded as one of the top riders by his fellow recruits, and his officers thought he would rise to captain rank in the future – but the Nazis so liked Nietzsche they might have tampered with this history, as they certainly did with Hitler’s backstory. The typical overcompensation of being bedridden and bookish led to his over-eagerness when he jumped onto his horse and landed his chest on the pommel – the saddle horn – and promptly landed himself back in the sick bed again with torn muscles in his left side, later exhausted and unable to walk for months. This would have been very embarrassing, and left his dreams stagnated once again, but this time by his own mind and not via any disease.
As discussed with the Horse and Rider Metaphor in “Cossacks and Cowboys” here on The Discerner, this shows the clear sign of the Saddle Imbalance – will over reason – aspect of an individual’s character, and therefore bespeaks a foretelling of the rest of his life. This can be seen ironically and humorously as synchronicity, as the actual metaphor rings true in the pun of the saddle matching the very embodiment of what not to do in following your will over reason and failing to self-control. We have a big irony here.
It gets worse for Loser Fred, as he is the embodiment and advocate for the “no excuses for failure mentality.” So for any of you out there that want to give him a break and offer Christian charity to the author of “The Anti-Christ,” he went on to demand everyone should kill weakness and offer no sympathy – a “might makes right” philosophy. So I will not spare him from his own application of his ideas to himself.
As a sportsman, we always hear “would’ve, could’ve, should’ve” from losers – thus referencing the will-to-power narrative of Fred’s lengthy works – as he has a bit of a little Napoleon complex, I think. As a captain of the defence at middle linebacker for gridiron football, heavyweight freestyle wrestler, rugby lock, and in other sports successfully played, I have seen these types often enough. Too far up the coach’s backside brown-nosing to power in the most simplistic of ways. Admirers of Nietzsche should take note of his klutz nature, as he continues to stumble his whole life. Imagine him lecturing other soldiers about not being weak in any way, and then on a battlefield taking action by jumping on a horse and injuring himself, to then be bedded alongside real men wounded in battle. Add this to other aspects of his life and you could make a comedy.
His later praise of famous leading warriors rings true again to a kind of projection of what he would have liked to be, and is an overcompensation – as he likes those that win by any means that are German, over those that win with more honourable tactics, and/or might be more obscure to the public. We have a bit of a groupie here repeating what all the other Germans used to say at that time.
Jordan Peterson’s pumping up of Nietzsche in his lecture will be covered later, but Jordan matches old Freddie boy in some ways, as his need to use terms and phrases that obscure ideas more than enlighten, and his constant shifting from idea to idea to remain elusive, smells of the very same insecurity as Nietzsche. Jordan needs to be bigger than he is – again like a little Napoleon complex.
If one has ever read the older British Empire’s books for boys, like “Chums,” which boost boys to be adventurous, one could compare these to Nietzsche’s adult philosophical visions of getting all the independent German principalities’ men and boys ready for joining into one nation under Bismarck’s iron fist – which I go into more depth on later – just as the British were trying to get young lads ready for their imperial system. This is the root of the Ubermensch Superman, as superhero comic books might have been a version of this to get American young men ready for their imperialism in the Philippines, Cuba, and the world wars too. Hitler again was in love with Nietzsche and Friedrich the Great, and we have records of Hitler playing Cowboys and Indians in Austria like in the British Chums books, so we see some common threads by our government handlers. Yet with Hitler we have a soldier that was actually in war, received a medal, and suffered blindness from a French gas attack. With Loser Fred we just have his clumsiness. I must add that all these first-person computer fighting games are meant for the same future purpose, especially as our Western leaders keep making moves that are the very opposite of stopping a third world war starting. DEI pass-overs in employment may be swept up in the future into positions in the military ranks with dreams of a nine-lives cat, as drones need such game skills that they have learned from DARPA for bombing and shooting civilians on screens.
A wise non-Freemason father replacement for Nietzsche would have brought him to heel in his youth by stating: “Before killing God, you should kill the vices in your own personality, that are obvious to anyone paying attention.”
The Freemason’s Touch
Why would the Freemasons want to build up such a man as Loser Fred? What is the purpose? Simply put, the German side of the Kleptocracy wanted to attack Christianity full force. Bismarck had had a problem, as he tried to suppress the Catholics to make the whole country publicly Lutheran Protestant, while among the financial administrative elite they were to be Calvinist Protestants, and of course amongst the highest branch of leadership the push was for Freemasons and Black Nobility. Bismarck had one of his few failures in this religious effort, as the Catholic Bavarian leadership and their allies in the region were aware of a few tricks that they could see going on – for Pope intrigues over the centuries had a way of wising you up to such efforts at power. The Catholics stubbornly countered and then suggested Bismarck make a united country through employment changes that we have never seen in the West since that time, which brought in all the things that ruined the leftists of that time: workman’s compensation if injured on the job, pensions that travelled with you to your next job, and above all a living wage that was protected by a closed market, mainly protected from the evil British ways of undercutting other nations through underhanded business tactics. This worked and made Germany the industrial symbol for the world to follow at that time, like the Americans were at this time too, but not as good due to more independent US bankers profiting on the American public’s backs like the British ones. The British were moving to destroy both these systems, so as to break any unity between the elites of a society and its population.
Bismarck had wars with Denmark at that time to take the pro-English portions of Germany in the Hanover regions for Germany, where the Hanoverian Freemasons had allowed Jews into the lodges since their kings had taken the British Throne starting with George I. Bismarck was of course for Blood and Steel ideals, and so wanted to also make Germany a warrior country, like Prussia. So through the Freemasons a martial spirit could be magnified by playing down Christianity and thus steal both Catholic and Protestant followers to the old robust pagan warrior spirit – that also came about more obviously by the very same forces under Hitler and the Nazis later yet again. Friedrich Nietzsche was the first public version of this tip-of-the-spear effort.
By Their Fruit You Will Recognize Them
The final results of this effort led to a win in the Franco-Prussian War and the unification of Germany under Prussian dominance. This was followed by the losses in two world wars, then the split into two during the Cold War, and presently Germany has a version of Stockholm Syndrome as it has taken up the ideas of its oppressors – all in on feminism, pro-immigrant, pro-woke, and pro-environmental restrictions. It has virtually abandoned traditional Christianity, and of all things is financing and giving arms to Ukraine in the war against Russia. How is that Blood and Steel, Will to Power, and submitting to the Prussian Educational System going, Fritz?
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.” – Sir William Francis Butler
At the root of Germany’s main problem, which is symbolized perfectly by Loser Fred, is the Prussian Education System that intentionally dumbs down its people, which started around the time of another Gay Fred – that being the Head of World Freemasonry at the time and King of Prussia, Frederick the Great. The Great Gay Fred ran away at his first battle, to find out later his army had won, likely covering over his lack of manliness by being upset because his soldiers would not do everything he asked – like kill women and children – because they had too much scholarship and Christianity in them. So these Gay Freds eventually led to this conditioning by education of people that follow like square-heads.
Now Germany had highly educated people in many narrow fields, and you will hear praising to this score in much literature, yet you must understand these records are influenced by the very same people that brought this system in slowly to all Western nations, and so have a conflict of interest, or wish not to play down the very system that gave them their degrees. This is exactly as normies do today, unquestioningly following instructions by authority figures, as they have all been doing under the Prussian Educational System from its inception – though by other names and slogans. This Prussian Education System has come to bite us all, though it has as many names to hide its agenda as a chameleon. Now, not to bad-mouth Germany too much, their many small banks’ financing systems help create jobs and wealth that all nations should follow, but look for these all over the world to be crushed by the largest multinational banks after the Great Reset.
So when this fatherless young man Loser Fred, with excellent regurgitative skills from his early version of the Prussian Educational System, arrived at the local Freemason lodge, he was to be taken under the arm of a handler that was wise to the big agenda. Whether Loser Fred was a fudge packer and cocksucker at that time I do not know, but such a young man entering a lodge certainly led to other Masons of that kind of degenerate persuasion to take Fred under their pants – and as we know from other articles on The Discerner covering Egyptian handlers using homosexuality to program their youth, it is likely in that lodge where Fred went fag.
Many of Friedrich Nietzsche’s loves of Pre-Socratic heroes and philosophers rings very true to what the German thinkers of that time hung their lederhosen on. The Germans were also big on Troy, the Iliad, and Saladin, as they were martially minded via education, and therefore wanted to skip everything from Socrates to pre-Saladin for most of their folk – added with as much German military history as one could cram into history and culture as a mainstay. Most German philosophers at that time would go into German cultural and military history more than those of other nations, as one can see in the book and film “All Quiet on the Western Front.” This was because at this time German culture was not very noteworthy, as even Hitler said as much. The Nazis protested and then succeeded in shutting down the Hollywood film version of “All Quiet on the Western Front” and likely burnt a few copies of that book in bonfires, due to its having many un-Prussian Educational System themes, despite being a war film and showing brave Germans fighting. To see Loser Fred in isolation without seeing what all the other German leaders were pushing at the time is to be compartmentalized and have horse blinders on. The other main ingredient in this period, to make passions trump logic, was the push of the German Romanticism Movement of the 18th and early 19th centuries, which again took people away from Christian morality and created much in the way of music and art. This also brought to the surface some things that we will cover next.
The German Butch Homosexual Love Affair
Ancient German tribes are recorded as having always tolerated butch homosexual practices, as they killed fem homosexual ones by drowning them in the bogs with a hammer to the back of the head. Later Germans of the gay way often looked to ancient history to support this idea, as the Gay Band of Thebes and Spartan ideals were used to support their ideas of “men do not need women in the Fatherland,” as opposed to mentally dealing with women to overcome their negative ways. Early in the time of the Vikings they had a male-only mercenary group called the Jomsvikings, who had a castle fortress from where they chose the best fighters to join their warrior elite – all this before the Catholic Knightly Orders had ever arrived on the scene. Now just like these later knightly orders, there were no women and a whole army of high-testosterone males who were fighting and training all day long. They were not monks, who were centred on overcoming the decadent passions and thus battling sins – instead these primitive Germans were into pillaging, raping, and massacring on campaign, and so there is no moral or intellectual battle to be had, despite historical revisionism to make Knightly Orders out to be monks.
Why would the Pope make all these knightly orders when he had many monk orders already? The Pope wanted earthly power to be a kind of Emperor above European kings, and had made the Orders to be his military wing, and did not care if they raped, murdered, pillaged, and sodomized his enemies, as that was the rule at that time in mercenary warfare. The whole Reformation can date back to when German mercenaries housed their horses in the Sistine Chapel and the mercenaries looked up and saw what for them was pornography on the ceiling and walls, and then told everyone back home how things were done in the Holy Roman Church. I do not think the Germans would have reacted the same way had they seen Orthodox icons, and so the West could have skipped the endless religious civil wars altogether, like the Eastern Orthodox Church did. Then we would have also skipped not having endless landscape paintings for 200 years too. The Catholic religious angle was to give the Pope’s armies cover and be more holier-than-thou when they warred, as excommunication was also used on his political enemies. One can look at what happened at Constantinople at the hands of the Western Knights, and the journals that covered that sacking, to see that these Catholic Orders were not warrior monks – they murdered, raped, stole, defiled, pillaged, and burned down holy places and items for days on end. Holy monks they were not.
Just like in criminal prisons, as opposed to political ones, if there are no women then some men become women – or more to the point, with these orders some decadent way to stop men leaving the German castles to rape women and children at nearby villages had to be falsely found – allowing the Jomsvikings and Teutonic Knights to fudge-pack and cocksucker among themselves until they went on campaign to do it all again to enemies. The region for both these orders was in the exact same region of Germany in the northeast, future Prussian territory. This never ended in German history, for there were the Templar Orders and other orders of young male-only recruits that were supposed to defend the weak but were into usury and warring for power. There were good Knights yes, and one order created the first hospitals, but we must see what always happens in wars and to warriors. As this old Russian saying reflects:
“Living with wolves means to howl like a wolf.”
This was followed in Germany by the endless scandals during the time of the Kaisers’ leadership, with usually officers in the army getting caught by more Christian ones in the act. One Austrian Prince committed suicide for his gay lover prior to WWI, which was turned into a woman to hide the scandal. The British were the same as well, but they preferred – and prefer today – the effete or fem homosexuals, because they were and are perfect for spying, and so the French called homosexuality the “English Disease,” as other more eastern nations called this German practice “the Prussian Disease.”
So Friedrich Nietzsche was to become a notorious homosexual due to his Freemason membership, which for all intents and purposes was yet another “Order.” When the Freemasons started, only men were allowed, yet today they have other lodges for women and minorities.
So these perverted passions were to have later gotten Nietzsche to catch syphilis in an Italian homosexual brothel from a very young Italian boy, but somehow his wild ideas – that come from him while his mind rots – are supposed to be taken as the ultimate in profound wisdom and fearlessness. In fact they tried to compensate for this by saying he got the disease intentionally. I see this as all cope. Anyone can go to an insane asylum and find someone that will make such wild claims, and even a broken clock is right twice a day, but that is hardly what those Freemasons, financial elite, and corrupt people at the top were after. For that we must understand their intent.
Friedrich Nietzsche did fall in love with one woman we are clearly aware of, whom he tried on countless occasions to get to marry him, but got turned down just as many times. So if Friedrich Nietzsche is some hero of the butch gay community, then that shoe does not fit either and again screams loser in yet another way – a failed wooer of women. I can just see Friedrich giving off the ick factor and being totally unable to be charming given what he has said of women in his formal work. The critiquing of women needs to come from someone that is neither jaded by women nor a lounge lizard trying to seduce them as a life quest – as the topic needs balance.
Do you not find it interesting that in our hyper-feminist and anti-Nazi times, Loser Fred has escaped scrutiny for his writings on women? Should he not have been taken from many a curriculum first before others in the 1970s onward, and thus made Jordan Peterson fearful to talk about such an out-and-out misogynist? Well, if atheism, Freemasonic Gnosticism, and pushing a destructive gay lifestyle are more important than undermining the family with feminism, then no – and then Peterson’s generous praising to crazy levels of this Loser extraordinaire makes a whole lot more sense, along with the Nazis’ glorification of Nietzsche also being ignored, which shows there are some top Freemason ideals at play here and their agendas trump all other agendas like feminism and anti-Nazism.
By making Nietzsche into a Superman – the Ubermensch – instead of the big loser that these historical facts show, he has been paraded out to the world to be a hero of brave thought, with all those Freemasons pulling PR strings to make this very confused man into someone wise, with ideas that he no doubt was given or taught when he was in the historical bathhouse of his time. Now if one can see past Nietzsche’s description of the Superman to see a young man trying to talk about something he wants to see himself as, you will have the easy insight into the loud, barking, attention-seeking philosophy of this effeminate man. His Will to Power was taken up by Hitler and his crowd, as they carried on the Gay Way – as the SA and SS were almost all butch fags too, which can be read about in the book “The Pink Swastika” by Scott Lively, freely available online and linked below. The book shows clearly how butch-faggish the Nazis were, yet seems to get dismissed out of hand and hidden from the public. Surely Hollywood wants another anti-Nazi story about the SA and SS? It seems not, as gay is a tool being used too much in our world to be so accurately shown as it was in Germany.
Getting someone that is purely a loser, or fears he is one, is certainly a way to get someone to do as you wish so as to appear the opposite of a loser, as can be seen in the Hollywood gay couch way into movies. Only men and boys that submit blindly to authority and become sycophantic to it get the big parts – if they have some talent – and as can be seen lately, do not even need talent.
This is why the powerful mean to take everyone’s wealth away shortly, if they have not done so to you already. Such fallen people are more open to joining other fallen persons to gain any power they can, as they are desperate spiritually – just like the fallen angels in hell. Yes, such selected types must be intelligent enough, but the key is they must be able to do as told and be a perfect sycophant first and foremost. When characters like Napoleon I and III, Hitler, and Stalin turned against these financial and occult forces abroad, it was usually because their local handler – or more accurately their local handlers, plural – chose to break with other financial and occult handlers abroad.
Freemason Divides
There were many early divisions in Freemasonry, which came to heel under the British elite in 1717. This did not carry over to Freemasonry in Germany, as they had been divided for some time – over half of the lodges would not allow Jews into their lodges as members as early as the 1700s. These Freemasons wanted also to unite all the independent German states under one government, pan-nationalism, which they would do under Bismarck. These German Freemason handlers would offer the Jews their homeland through the German alliance with the Ottomans in the later stages of World War I, just as the Balfour Declaration was being offered to the Jews from the Anglo-American side. In the end, Jewish-English ties won out over the German offer, even though the Ottomans had the actual land at the time and it would have been much less messy and violent to have them place the Jews there with Ottoman sanction. This led to the German handlers setting their sights of revenge on the Jews in WWII. The “stab in the back” was actually just that, as financial Jews took up propaganda in the US to help bring in the Americans on the Allied side in WWI, while financing and leading Jewish Communists to take over – or undermine – Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia. They also financed the huge debt hole that the British found themselves in, and many other technical things that most people are not interested in hearing about.
Please note though that Britain had been getting their people to pay off the endless interest payments from previous wars that had gone back to the Battle of Waterloo with France, due to the greedy nature of their handlers. So the Jewish money loans with interest were needed to win WWI, before larger amounts of American money could enter later. Even then the US was not so far gone, and you can see this in how the US government would not hand over money blindly at that time. So again the British needed new money to use with no questions asked. Without the Marshall Plan after WWII the British would have been in serious trouble too, as usury is parasitic and those holding the taken funds do not want to part with it for their nations, as can be seen in recent times with Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s “Brown’s Bottom Scandal.”
Later when Loser Fred died and the Nazis put up a statue of him in Berlin, and his younger sister would go arm-in-arm with Hitler on social occasions, we had Fred further turned into a formal state-sanctioned hero. Fred’s ideas would be an ever-ready method to get young men to hate Christianity, as unlike the Orthodox Christian faith and its dealings with endless invasions from the east – and fewer ones from the west – the idea of defending one’s faith and country is no sin if the leaders’ dreams of empire are kept in check.
Fred really comes from a long line of linear German thinkers who come forth to recreate the wheel in their own image with often semi-pragmatic justifications. Martin Luther was like this, as was Immanuel Kant – Freemason – and then Arthur Schopenhauer’s effort to create his version of Christianity. This need can be seen as the same obsession of overcoming Rome that has gone on in Germany throughout its history, and always comes into play with young Germans wanting to do things their own way with as little taken from other countries as possible. If the Germans had simply taken on the original Orthodox Church’s faith they would have moved ahead with Russia’s endless resources in a much more friendly relationship. But when they communicated with the Eastern Patriarchs in letters during the Reformation, they finally admitted the same stubbornness that had always followed them, telling the Eastern Patriarch in essence: “we want to do Christianity our own way.” This immature boyish behavior of not learning from wiser thinkers, and going over ground already covered, led to their downfall. Arthur Schopenhauer’s look at German honour is very on target, and yet he seems not to notice his hard-headed actions in not learning Orthodox teachings before trying to recreate his own version of Christianity. Germans have a mind for science, classical music, efficiency, and war, but not for philosophy, theology, jokes, and honour, for these have no straight lines. So let us move on to Jordan Peterson’s class on Friedrich Nietzsche, as I had so much fun with his class on Pinocchio that I hope it gives us a lot of laughs – as the man that seems to be pulled by invisible strings could not see Pinocchio missing the emotional strings that lead us to so much irony after irony.
Jordan Peterson’s Lecture
The link to Jordan Peterson’s lecture on Friedrich Nietzsche is in the Further Reading and Watching section below.
The German Freemasonry push of Friedrich Nietzsche in the 1800s to get Germany ready for war is comparable to Jordan Peterson’s role in getting the Western population to surrender to the NWO, via trying to manoeuvre the entire population of those still functioning with a conservative mindset – who often do not even want to call themselves “conservative” – into the exact polar opposite shift of a Hegelian Dialectic by being lost in contemplating their navels and smoking bellybutton lint. In other words, be comatose to events that will be happening by being lost in psycho-analysis and endless self-reflection.
The second purpose of Friedrich Nietzsche was to bring on anti-Christianity, so as to allow the individual state – or now global state – to run roughshod over their own populations by becoming the state as God. This goal is exactly the same as Mr. Jordan Peterson’s endless psychology mysticism, which drives people away from the much more useful true Christian spiritualism.
Friedrich Nietzsche is said, by Mr. Peterson in the linked lecture, to have said in one sentence what others took essays and books to say – while, in a Hegelian opposite, Mr. Peterson gives hour-long lectures and authors books that say very little, or next to nothing, of the big or medium picture. By using endless pedantic and obscure language, leaving most listeners jumping wildly from topic to topic, Jordan allows himself to love the sound of his own voice – he seldom asks, and never in this lecture, for questions from any of the audience. If you admire conciseness then please take up the calling by copying the master then, Mr. Peterson. Irony yet again.
Both Friedrich Nietzsche and Jordan Peterson jump from topic to topic and have that in direct commonality. They also both have mental health problems and have had premature claims of death before the actual event, which again puts them together as Hegelian Dialectic twins over time with their opposite but complementary agenda. But what is most galling is how Jordan tries to turn Friedrich Nietzsche into not being fully an anti-Christian with the following quote:
“He – Nietzsche – was ironically, and I’m pushing it here, possibly, ironically an anti-Christian.”
No need for the word “irony” twice there at all, Jordan. Loser Fred must be, arguably, the most public anti-Christian person to ever live. His book named “The Anti-Christ,” referencing himself, is a bit of a hint – but for most of Jordan’s well-groomed audience in their white room that seems like a lunatic asylum, there is no need for such details, as I doubt any of them is likely to read even one book of Friedrich Nietzsche. I do not think Jordan is a Christian in the least and is simply kissing the Wailing Wall for money, just as Loser Fred was always asking for handouts too.
Jordan then goes into a fast rundown of historical events, failing to show how they have any issues of connection with the topic, and stops to show how people suffered on $1.50 a day in the past – and how lucky we all must be now. Unfortunately $1.50 a day was paid in coins that were usually made of 90% silver, which has been removed from coins by Jordan’s handlers. Those very same silver coins – like the Kennedy half dollar times three, or quarters, dimes, and nickels – now equal almost a hundred dollars, and given by the end of 2026 could be two hundred dollars. One might not want to play this lecture again by the end of this year, let alone in the years to come where it could reach a thousand dollars as many estimate. I think historical revision by your friends, Mr. Peterson, should shelf this lecture in the circular file cabinet when that happens, and the Orthodox revival reaches its ever-growing heights. I guess Jordan never learned about inflation being caused by governments.
Jordan then goes into some kind of therapeutic defence of Friedrich Nietzsche, turning Nietzsche’s suffering from disease into a way to nirvana – as a backdoor way to make him Christ-like. Jordan fails to show this disease was self-inflicted and is connected to syphilis symptoms from buggery. Hardly a man of self-control if one is a man of strong “will”… no? I would put up almost any Orthodox Christian monk against your man, Mr. Peterson – for someone supposedly showing self-discipline and force of will, he shows little, as our monks climb mountains too, but stay in them for years.
There are jumps into Jung, Freud, Darwin, and Piaget, which – aside from Darwin – satisfy Jordan’s need to bring psychology into all discussions, even when it has almost nothing to do with Friedrich Nietzsche, as he avoids all the mental things I have covered here.
The worst of Jordan’s lecture was having to listen to him say that our rejection of Christianity brought on Communism, as we supposedly lurched for something to replace the certainty of our faith. This is the most dishonest thing I have ever heard him say, as it has become common knowledge – with those who read on the subject – that Communism was brought to bear by the very Western elites that have always wanted to do away with Christianity. One can read “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution” by Antony C. Sutton, or “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Quigley, or “Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War” by Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor. You can even search today and plainly learn that the Western banks financed the Bolshevik Revolution – with Trotsky, prior to the Revolution, being wined and dined in expensive hotels in the US and driven around in limousines. Or how US President Wilson had US passports issued for Trotsky – Freemason – his wife, and child. In addition, how these Communists were packed on a large ship with guns, ammo, explosives, and gold to be encouraged to sail for Russian ports to help take the ally of those fighting Germany out of the war before the US joined. But who cares about history, Mr. Peterson, for you have an agenda to pursue in getting everyone on the couch – and maybe we can all have a Jew in a tweed coat smoking a pipe listen to our effete feelings and dreams and then recommend we return to pay more money to fulfil a need to be self-absorbed and secretly want to sleep with our mothers.
Summary
Friedrich Nietzsche was a Freemason, homosexual, and paedophile who contracted syphilis and went into deep megalomania, going about attacking the Christian faith because his handlers in occult ranks had programmed him to do so – or mentored him to hate God because of making sins, what Loser Fred thought of as fun, bad. Even despite throughout his life failing to measure up to his own assertions of bravery, fearlessness, might-makes-right, and no excuse for failure, somehow he has something important to say about our world. No need for Jesus, saints, and honourable heroes to learn from – as we have a demon to learn from. How foolish of us to follow the God that destroyed Bolshevism, which the atheists like Fred said would destroy God.
It is up to God to determine who goes to hell to fry, but I do not know how such a man – and those who taught and follow him – will escape the fiery pits. In life and death there is no bigger sign of being a loser than this.
God will not be mocked.