Series
MASCULINITY UNDER ATTACK
Culture, Identity & Society Reframed

MASCULINITY UNDER ATTACK — PART 2: RELIGIOUS ARCHAIC-REVIVALISM

MASCULINITY UNDER ATTACK — PART 2: RELIGIOUS ARCHAIC-REVIVALISM

The Matriarchal Age

The Kleptocracy have had their cultural creators slowly shifting us towards a clear form of religious archaic-revivalism since about the 1950s. This means, in simple terms, to take us back to a more primitive, uncultured mindset, with the hopes of making us easier to handle. It is recorded from many sources and accepted history that the religious faiths of the pre-civilised world were matriarchal. There are very old statues, inscriptions, and goddess references, with the oldest statues being a very fat-breasted female icon – sometimes found on a throne with lions on either side of her, or found in place of the legs of the throne. These lions could likely denote her men at arms, who protected her and went to war on her command.

When I was touring the Parthenon in Athens, the official tour guide went as far as to totally distort history, as she made out that there were no pagan armies that destroyed Athens in the past, omitting the Heruli (267 AD) and later the Visigoths (396 AD), while the long Muslim Ottoman occupation was played down so this feminist could blame all the defacing on the Christians. Before making a formal complaint to her boss, I told her the real history, and she hand-waved it off. The Venetian bombardment of the Parthenon was also played down – that bombardment hit the Ottoman armoury hidden inside it, which blew it up quite thoroughly.

When the Christians first arose in Athens it would not have helped their cause to have started destroying all the buildings and statues, and it was later when the country became Christian that some Greeks defaced the pagan religious figures that are called art now. As for the matriarchal goddess statues, we are at a loss as to who defaced those, but history is long and the Muslim Ottomans did control the Balkans (including Greece) for a very long time. I bring this up because there is state-sponsored historical revisionism… and feminist revisionism. The matriarchal cults were no panacea of bliss – to put it as nicely as I can.

It has been theorised that in this pre-antiquity time our societies did not know that men had anything to do with childbirth. In other words, women were thought to be magical in giving birth, also due to the pleasure men received from having sex with them. This magical fertility is why these women goddesses were connected with crop fertility, as the female priestesses likely played up their ability to control such things with bone reading, palm reading, and any number of like-minded fortune-telling schemes, some of which still linger in our world today.

Since men would leave to hunt or farm during the days, women were left back nearer to the camp or cave and would herd themselves into a matriarchy, falling under the leadership of whichever woman could make the rest feel most intimidated. This could have been the real start of the shift towards female leadership. When men are absent for war or work, women will revert back to such effete instincts, as can be seen in the effects of the world wars. If one watches how female leadership is usually formed even today, it is a combination of above-average visual appearance, aggressiveness with words (often with insults destroying another woman’s reputation), visual status gained via items – jewellery, clothes – combined with theatrics and blind self-confidence. Such high-voltage emotionalism would make other women kowtow, as little could be hidden in such emotional cliques, but it is based on the use of emotions against the wrong emotional group-think. Such female leadership very likely exacerbated tribal problems in pre-antiquity, instead of producing the later turn to logic.

It was only the return of men from hunts or battles, where meritocracy played a much larger role, that would then upset the female hierarchy. Unfortunately, at these early times men thought women were magical, and likely feared the hysterical emotional outbursts, and so did not question female goddess ideas in primitive times. So until men finally discovered they had something to do with child creation, and came to see goddess foretelling failures – even as these were often deliberately vague, as can be seen in the female Oracle of Delphi statements below – men did not wrest power away from the local or regional matriarchy. Instead it would first slip into the Androgynist Age.

The Oracle of Delphi

Oracle to Solon:

“Seat yourself now amidships, for you are the pilot of Athens. Grasp the helm fast in your hands; you have many allies in your city.”

Oracle to Croesus:

“I know the number of the sand and the measure of the sea; I understand the speech of the dumb and hear the voiceless. The smell has come to my sense of a hard-shelled tortoise being cooked with a lamb’s flesh in a bronze pot: bronze is the cauldron underneath, and bronze is the lid.”

When some ruler asked who would win the battle, the Oracle’s reply was:

“An Empire will fall.”

Stating truisms and being vague was meant to keep their position of importance. Subtlety and being indirect are keystones to effeminate behaviour – especially when the threat is direct and at hand – and so there is a lack of accountability going back thousands of years in recorded history. Modern feminism’s shunning of accountability is not new. It is a long-standing practice or instinct. Whether it is looking bad on the outside or having a bad reputation, the goal is to appear as perfect as one can appear. When women fight physically they often scratch with nails to hurt another’s appearance, and when they gossip they try to hurt another’s reputation. That is a truth of them. Appearance is key to being a goddess.

It is not known how long this period lasted, but it would also seem that women who played up the magical role were allowed any number of charismatic antics that we see in a clearly strong minority of women today. Women and girls being quite obsessed with endless forms of singing, dancing, and talking – these are the things that allowed a woman to excel in the past. The more one could captivate with singing, dancing, and other forms of emotional voyeurism, the more likely a woman could snag a better husband, as opposed to just being pretty and quiet. During the Covid-1984 psyop there was endless dancing and singing by hospital staff, which is hard to rationalise as appropriate with so many dying and being made to suffer. The fact that those in power felt a need to make things a kind of Disney happy-happy parade shows they are well aware of the need to mask death in a happy cult-like facade to keep people – and women in particular – from going into hysterics. This is also shown in Huxley’s “Brave New World,” where they play happy songs at their death centres. Therefore those in power wanted a happy queue of people taking their shots, as opposed to thinking people dealing with the narrative. One would surmise that fake and gay dancing stops people from thinking.

Hysterical actions by women, as seen in those supporting the shots and vaccines, have a habit of causing others to back off, or come to such women’s aid, with little to no effort to make such women calm down or face stern reactions. Men who usually and wisely get both sides of any argument or conflict before rendering a judgment seem to break out of such better behaviour and instead take the hysterical women’s side instinctively – for men feel that any woman being this upset must have a justified reason to do so. With a child having a tantrum we might hesitate, and certainly prefer not to get involved. This flaw in our dealing with women has lasted to this very day, as the chivalry code came into being very early in the 11th or 12th centuries. In chivalric stories, crying women need rescuing, and the woman is always pretty and not homely. So today, instead of wise judgment, there is always a clear reaction of men on white horses either temporarily catering to such hysterical women, or surrendering temporary judgment to them.

A test was done on the streets where a woman mockingly hit a male and other males passing by either did nothing or started in on also attacking the man with no backstory at all. In the reverse, when a man hit a woman, almost all the males stopped, many got in between, and still others went after the male – again with zero backstory. So there is something instinctive in some males. This has gone to such lengths that the greatest genocide in history, that of women having abortions, is said to be a woman’s right and to hell with the father’s position.

Now that men have finally turned on the feminists, and the skittles agenda, these women are meeting resistance, as the elite are slightly turning on feminism themselves, to ride the back of the coming masculine revival. They will encourage male and female conflict to a point, but they will no longer have all their eggs in the feminist basket.

I believe this Matriarchal Age rests in this earlier period when such women could get the tribe to do her whims based on how emotive she could get – which would include on the surface blind self-confidence and delusional hysterics. One can see this in the eyes of a woman we know is lying, by the expression on her face that she really does believe her lies herself. It is uncanny, yet a liar that believes their own lies is a better liar.

This mental break is why women are able to be brainwashed much more easily than full-grown males. Originally the first study of psychology was centred on women’s hysterics, as at that time (late 1800s) there was a heavy masculine period where Christianity and logic were at their height for the time. Additionally, Victorian Period middle and upper-class women had to suppress their emotive nature, and thus were very conflicted – not talking too much, wearing puritan-like clothing that covered all their bodies up, not letting gossip get too out of hand, staying home most of the time (or having a family member or coachman escort them), and when visitors came, having to endure logic-based conversations from the elderly men. These Victorian women had to practise deference to family members, instead of the effete “familiarity breeds contempt,” or they would have become isolated. Divorce meant a Victorian wife would not get the children and would have to get a job to support herself, which would bring the couple back together as neither would find single life all it was made out to be. Recently, in the State of Kentucky, changing the laws found the same results as divorce fell drastically when mothers did not effectively get all they wanted. The frustration of such Victorian age women can be seen in their mistreatment of servants, and the strategic use of asylums – some would recover from their symptoms on a dime when they risked being placed permanently in one, or one of their requests was met by the husband, and they could therefore stop the hospital visits as a method of playing the victim of some unknown ailment. This hurts real women suffering from true ailments, as false accusations of husband physical abuse hurt women in such real situations today.

Today we can see many a woman acting confident with zero understanding of a subject, gallingly stating that there is no need for one to understand such details, as she is just special, connected to the cosmic spiritual world of such and such, or that in her previous life she was Cleopatra – and so warrants special privilege. There have always been men of this sort as well, but they meet with more resistance and accountability.

Most female arguments go through very predictable avenues: they go personal in attack, go status-ranking, go victim-claiming, use personal unrelated weaknesses of others, tone police, distract with all manners of dissimulation, and make general efforts to ruin another’s reputation. This has now run its course and males have had enough – the red pill reaction to feminism.

Please see the debate linked in the Further Reading and Watching section below where a Catholic Christian woman knows some higher terms, yet fails to grasp their implications. Watch her leaps in logic, attempts to talk over the other side, efforts to hold the floor, fast talking (which comes from little listening to the other side and somehow imagining speed equals truth), childish facial gestures, being on the edge of hysterics, undue self-confidence, and insulting the other side as a means to impress crass onlookers. She may sway the emotionalists, but not anyone who values thinking. It is this hysterical self-confidence that allows her to undercut her own Christian faith in real terms, and so undermines it as she thinks she is helping it.

Outside her solipsism, and her being on the edge of hysterics, there is little reason most modern males would not sleep with her and/or marry her. Please note how she wanted to dive into her interpretations of love, as that is infinite in itself, and how she puts on lipstick during the discussion as she is concerned with her appearance in a debate of ideas. This is why women cannot lead the church.

Unwin’s Book

In modern times Disney encouraged such misbehaviour very early in its history, making all girls into princesses and men into “prince charmings” – a backdoor to the reintroduction of chivalry to males, who must do as the woman wants to make her feel more at ease. Victorian morality was harder on wealthy women, while chivalry was and is harder on men, and easy on women. This has gotten to the very ugly stage we have today that I do not need to outline, as most are able to see how farfetched it has gotten, as the Kleptocracy wants depopulation and broken homes leading to dysfunctions galore. This has all been top-down, just as the overly Victorian Period was when the elite wanted to see if they could maximise the nature of women and men to their best results, as described in “Sex and Culture” by J.D. Unwin.

Disney, by embedding this need to not upset women, led to endless sheltering of females, and the undue pressure for males to be gentlemen to all kinds of women – not upsetting them in the slightest. This led directly to female control of relationships. “Protecting little girls” being the most extreme version of this prevented any critiquing of female delusions until their later 30s. To bed such women today, simps, male feminists, and lounge lizards think it best not to contradict their delusions, and so act biologically like squid or cuttlefish – mimicking females’ preferred male styles, behaviours, opinions, and attitudes to await a chance to quickly mate with them at some vulnerable time in the future. We have some records of such submissive-aggressive males raping women who continue to go after more traditional men, and who use these cuttlefish males simply as a female friend – a shoulder to cry on – with the term “male tampons” being used by traditional males to label those believers of all things women. All these features point back to this effect on female nature from the matriarchal religious age that can be seen in the story of Jezebel and other pagan women in the Bible.

The Androgynist Age

Between the first Matriarchal Age and the newer Patriarchal Age was the Androgynist Age. When men started to realise that they needed to impregnate women before they could have children, and as the matriarchal leadership left much to be desired, men came to assert themselves through the hunt, farm, and war hierarchy, and so more male pagan gods started to rise in importance. This also coincided with city states and cultural creation, as things started to get done more and emotive talking became of less importance. Yet since the female goddess still had a hold on the majority, there was a time when pagan gods and goddesses could sweep up both sides of this equation by being both male and female at the same time. This form was popular in the boy toy version, as women like pets, dolls, animation, and youth that look more like harmless babies. Here is the best historical version that shows this transfer:

“Cybele and Attis is the story of the Phrygian great mother goddess Cybele’s tragic love for the mortal Attis. It is also a story of self-mutilation and regeneration… Cybele gave birth to Attis, a hermaphroditic demon so strong and wild that the other gods feared him. In their terror, they cut off his male sexual organ… The boy, whose name was Attis, was unaware of the love Cybele bore him. In time, Attis saw the king of Pessinus’ beautiful daughter, fell in love, and wished to marry her. The goddess Cybele became insanely jealous and drove Attis mad as revenge. Running crazy through the mountains, Attis stopped at the foot of a pine tree. There Attis castrated and killed himself. From Attis’ blood sprang the first violets on a pine tree. The tree took care of Attis’ spirit… The ‘priests’ of Cybele and Attis – referred to as Galli – would emasculate themselves and become eunuchs in emulation of Attis.” – Wikipedia

What I see clearly reflected in the Cybele events above is a perfect example of this second stage of the powerful matriarchal queen’s loss of power, who used her son (or grandson) to captivate her kingdom with her boy toy, but when he fell in love with another young girl, the queen had the boy poisoned and/or guilt-tripped and/or castrated – as she wanted his incestuous love for herself alone. This can be seen in how some mothers are insanely possessive of their sons and take an immediate disliking to their girlfriends.

It is interesting that in Asia, the dominant mother-in-law conflict with the new husband we sometimes experience in the West is not found as often. In the patriarchal Far East the culture has the much stronger new wife being set upon by the son’s mother. In both cases, though, it is the wife who dislikes the change of emotions and the loss of her emotional control. The new father-in-law feels less threatened by the emotional changes, as his concern is with only other non-emotional changes that a new wife will not threaten, while a new husband will not be able to undermine his position in the family in real unemotional terms. The father sees his son as centred on his new wife, and the new husband must show his worth in many forms (establishing a clear hierarchy) – added to which new wives historically went to the husband’s family. The new wife must then befriend the new family, and her new husband is key to her success, so she acts loyally. If the husband goes to the wife’s family, which did not happen very often in the past but often does now, the new wife has an assortment of questionable relationships with old male friends, girlfriends, and of course her parents all nearby to control her husband – and thus leads to an unnatural level of female leadership. Success was likely less common in these situations, and so the tradition of sending the new wife with her dowry to the husband’s family had more success.

Jezebel in the Bible is brought with her pagan worship of Asherah, Astarte, Ishtar, and Baal to Judea – the matriarchal pagan religion using royal marriage as its vehicle. In a related account, it is Herodias’s daughter Salome who uses her sexual dancing to get Herod the King to kill John the Baptist, who spoke truth to power when speaking of Herodias’s evil religion and ways. Here we have the Matriarchal Age on its last legs, still lingering as the new patriarchal faith is on the rise, and the King trying to keep both male and female faiths happy. But his spoiling of Salome, due to her royalty status, leads him to the greatest of sins. There is nothing wrong with women getting status from actions and true direct logical thinking. It is giving women status based on feelings, looks, and being special “just because” that the delusion is created and maintained.

This historical background is why those in power know we can slip back into these androgynous and matriarchal ways easily, because it has roots in our evil nature, and in the female will to power – indirectly.

Even in the historical Germans’ male ideas of honour, the power to accuse someone of dishonour carries much more weight than the male accused – until proven innocent. The onus rests on the accuser. Like today with false accusations of rape carrying no equal jail time for the false accuser when a man is found innocent.

This is why feminism was brought in first, and once that had happened, women would support (more than regular straight men) the Lesbian and Gay pride stage, to be followed by the skittles or the alphabet soup of perversions, not to mention the rape, death, and cannibalism shown in the Epstein, Jimmy Savile, and Belgium pedo scandals.

Presently it has been male fury at these scandals that has lasted, as many women have moved on to new fashionable scandals and care less for older facts – they do not like or hold overt vendettas. Public justice thus goes unserved. In the Bill Gates scandal, his wife only wanted to divorce Bill when the scandal became public, or a loss of face occurred. This is not masculine, as men tend to care much less if others know the truth as much as they do themselves, and will act independent of public knowledge or opinion on any given relationship issue.

Even with men making up a larger majority of these degenerates in the scandals, it is also males who are more rabid in destroying such evil. The males taking part in these evil scandals are ugly, fat, old, and even crippled, and one can see they could not get a young woman without indirect power and wealth forcing the issue. When feminists rightly accuse the kleptocratic patriarchy of being responsible, they then fail to protest at these rich and powerful players’ homes or companies, but instead prefer pragmatically to go after weaker men, or defend criminal immigrants from government ICE border security. The men at the top escape true judgment because they say the politically correct right words, are rich and powerful, and use espionage force to put the fear of Satan into any women that dare to aim higher. Unchristian women of today see power and wealth as greater goals than morality, which is why many women go after dark triad traits in men. This is shown in women saying they like nice guys, but going after bad boys.

It is presently the privileged position of women in our society that is running into the hidden super-privileges of the Jews and other Kleptocracy members. Many of the women who were former girls that were abused have come forward thinking they can use the media to push feminist power to get justice. What we have underway is the true believer feminists finally receiving the facts of life – that they are low on the totem pole – and that their instinctive preference to kiss up to power and abuse those below them was in fact the right evil pragmatic call – according to cowardice and depravity – as the Kleptocracy is now making plain, as they kill more and more of these whistleblowers. Once again no woman wants to admit they have been duped, as accountability means a loss of status. Only righteous men, backed up by truly good righteous women, could stop this evil leadership, as it is an affront to God and good people.

Historically women liked to be worshipped from this archaic time, and that is what Hollywood appears to do now in their films, as their heroines are Mary Sues – untrained and untested perfect warrioresses born perfect who do not need to develop in any way. Most prized are terms like “Diva” or “Idol,” which have been deliberately chosen by those in power, along with singing and Hollywood “Stars,” to play up goddess implications. The idea of getting bruised, broken, and scarred to be powerful is not appealing to women, and so power must come from outside appearance, MK Ultra denial, and other forms of just being perfect as is. Women have led the way into worshipping Hollywood stars, and now this skill of acting as someone else has become leaps and bounds above its station in importance. Regardless of the illusion and the terrible truth of how women and children are treated in the industry of movies and music, the need to be worshipped and watched by others simply overwhelms women, girls, and boys – rendering them worshippers of false faiths just like those recorded in the history books from ancient Rome and Greece.

Patriarchy prevailed all over the world, and matriarchy and androgyny only remained on the fringes of larger societies as small tribes kept versions of it, as critiqued in Unwin’s book. These small enclaves have likely disappeared in our time, and so we have not recorded how they were unsuccessful in dealing with the creation of complex civilisations, culture, and theology. The rival patriarchal kingdoms of the past became rival states, cultures, and religions, and then led us to today with a Kleptocracy bent once again on dreams of world control. The Kleptocracy has gone about attacking their own people in an effort to weaken them, and therefore “destroying patriarchy” is key to their plans.

Distracting Fathers and Stealing the Rite of Passage from Boys

The Magic Sword Mistake

After a young man can negotiate the world of being critiqued (and not take it personally), he then must accomplish goals in his life, which needs self-discipline in abundance. There are men and boys that have a Magic Sword set of skill sets, or imagine they have one. Young men who have one area, or a few areas, that they have overcome their fears in – say the ability to surf, skydive, motorbike jump, or any other skills we can all admire – quite commonly try to flaunt this skill as a be-all and end-all of male skills to onlookers. This is then wrongly paraded by some immature males as if all things that need to be done have been completed to be an independent actor in our world. Such males that are on the right path must continue, not stand still, as they need to apply the learned method of conquering a fear in getting over any obstacle in their way, and then rest these talents until they are needed in their lives – not repeat the one area they have accomplished endlessly. With most males being effete these days, these Magic Sword types do seem to have a step up over others. Still, it often stops there, as they become adrenaline junkies and feel their work is done, resting on their laurels instead of using the same methods to overcome any other kinds of obstacle in their way to an important goal.

Now the areas of competence do not need to be so public and physically centred, but young males need to be acknowledged for bravely becoming men publicly, as was done in all healthy cultures of the past, so they do not go about trying to prove something all the time – and hence move on and start to teach others as they are acknowledged as men by their community. Such males, let into the men’s group, are then likely to have their ears open to the elders. We, as Orthodox Christian fathers, must build such a coming-of-age tradition – outside of baptism – and it must not be based on age, nor effete talents, nor giving into credentialism. These are how the system presently controls, degrades, and dumbs down all – not only boys – and we must find the right overcoming of fears with a clearly acceptable presented stage for the boy becoming a man, to then be treated as such by all men who have also passed the mark.

Freemasonry is a bastardisation of this. Our efforts should be anti-secret society, as these are based on corrupt means. The Boy Scouts were an attempt at this, but started by yet another Englishman connected to the fagging traditions of that country, and destroyed through its acceptance of homosexuals openly into their ranks – sued into bankruptcy.

Good fathers teach boys early in their lives to deal with digs or slights from others in their youth, as a very practical first step to learning when and how to deal with attacks. Having young men recognise when they may have to fight someone, or not, is key to their early lives with other males – and also with verbal attacks from females. Bad company managers or bosses bully as well, and so how one should deal with them should also be included. Never fighting directly is the woman’s preferred modus operandi, and males that take that up as their own main method deserve what they get, as they live “lives of quiet desperation.”

Some men have been known to kick the dog when they get home out of frustration with the boss – you think you can take it, and in fact cannot. A man of character understands himself most of all, and knows how much he can take. He may find sport outlets to take out his frustration, or any other healthy outlet that allows for a letting off of steam. The Orthodox Church is one of the most important, as for example the confession avoids one projecting one’s sins and weak character onto others. Most of the time these confrontations with others can be water off a duck’s back with digs, but it takes self-discipline, and there is a time to fight and a learning process that comes with enough fights to know when to act or not. This learning is not like an effete coward, as they only strike when everything is perfect and they can distance themselves from the deed. This is not a fight with resistance, but a bullying or vulture kill, as the victim poses no threat. Women prefer such perfect situations, as they risk no scarring, and so will await a way to attack with no risk to themselves and those they love.

Not all areas of danger must be overcome in one’s life, as they are endless. These excess dangerous areas may not be in one’s way, and so wasting one’s skills in overcoming them is not becoming a master of one’s soul. Learning the skills and then using them with a mature purpose is key – or one can be a thrill seeker, nihilist, and/or a villain. The choice is yours.

These things take time and it is this issue of time that has been taken away from fathers and sons deliberately. It is much easier to destroy than it is to build, and so steps must be taken to protect our efforts – not because we hide, but because we do not want fathers and sons relationships to easily be destroyed from any quarter.

Battling Boredom

Another very important aspect of self-discipline to be taught to boys is dealing with boredom. Is not boredom in study – and other less attention-seeking quests to learn truth that are not praised by the tribe – worthy of becoming a man? Women learn well due to drama or fear, as their emotions are triggered. Are you the same – only moved by public accomplishments? Are all the battles of life only exciting ones? Will you need to be brave when no one is watching? Will boredom defeat you in overcoming what you need to do and learn? Why are women not common in engineering departments no matter how the elite tries to get them there? Men like logic and can overcome boredom to learn first, to create later. Teach this fact to a boy after he has overcome a more direct fear in front of others – when he has listened to you and is eager to learn more of this conquering-fear thing, as you have shown him the way. Teach him to battle anything that has boredom as its sidekick too, so that when something of merit is in his way he will not let boredom defeat him.

Wanting to be a rock star has led multiple millions of boys to destruction for every single star that has made some mark. Those in power created this whole industry as a cushion for all the industry going to other nations, as they did not want young men uniting and marching for jobs, or demanding support to start small businesses that would end up competing with those in power. Of course there is the corrupt selection process by insiders in such talent industries from as early as the 1940s and 50s – yet we must see girls screaming for the Beatles at their first US airport as paid for by the industry. Once the girls thought other girls liked them, they began to like them, and so on and so on…

When good fathers are removed from time with their sons, these sons tend to go verbose and give talking more worth than it deserves, as their mothers and sisters influence this love of verboseness in their lives. This can be seen in the music industry’s shift away from playing instruments towards all vocals at the time. As the music industry news has shown from all over the world, these boy toy bands do not compose their own songs, do not write their own lyrics, do not play their own music, do not choose their own clothes, do not choreograph their own dance steps, do not put on their own make-up, and in the case of some artists do not even sing their own songs. The boy toys are now chosen like girls based on looks, and to add insult to injury these boys do not choose who they have sex with – they are traded around to dirty old music industry men and higher-level people in power. They do, in fact, sell their soul for rock and roll.

This verboseness in the culture has led to some other poor versions of male leadership in the form of the smarty talking back of some males, as a kind of outgrowth of the class clown phenomenon. The smart-ass comedian or class clown has now risen to the symbol of manhood – like in the movie “Jackass” – in the absence of real men. Comedians and chefs have always risen in popularity historically when a society is in decline. Women tend to “live to eat” more, while men “eat to live” more – as the saying goes.

The quiet man that bullies mess with to their demise was a staple of the past ideal of manhood. Gary Cooper, John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, Humphrey Bogart, and even Bruce Willis are all spartan with words, and are preferred by men as actors. The boy toy actors come and go in Hollywood because women are fickle and tend to go with the latest fashionable male or female, and as these effete characters age they lose their looks – right along with their popularity. True popular male actors will have a stable male following that does not disappear – as long as they do not go fake and gay.

At an early stage in a boy’s life he must choose to not follow the serf life, or choose the independent actor or pack route. Before you decry the pack, please remember that a boy gets to choose his pack, while a sycophant does not get to choose the authority he is forced to follow. He can only choose the role he may want in such a complex, but there is no assurance he will get it. He is passive to the structure – or as stated in other articles, must be a bee in the hive. The pack has immediate benefits as he is now no longer able to be attacked many on one, and his pack will teach him male roles not found in the company. With the father absent or engaged in being passive to the establishment himself, the boy has no one on the ground for dealing with his male emotional problems. Helicopter male parenting has many weaknesses. Add to that a mother that dominates, and the father loses his role and becomes weak in the boy’s eyes.

This issue happened to me and my father, and I called him on it. I always let sleeping dogs lie with my father, but when he tried to lead me as he submitted to females, bosses, conventional wisdom, and social clichés, I would call him on it. I was the most respectful to him in our family, but I was not preferred by him because he wanted to save face, and preferred to be falsely flattered by women and other men.

In his defence, he grew up during the war in England and had people blown up all around him, and so lost some of his masculinity when he faced blood, guts, and death. This is why the Kleptocracy starts wars and sends their men to them, while profiting in many ways from those wars. Please understand any kind of social chaos will do the exact same thing, whether it is a pandemic, economic collapse, or man-made weather event. It is all relative to fathers that live through them, as they have seen things that make these simple issues pale in importance. Thus the fox or weasel Kleptocracy have a free hand to do as they wish, as most men either tune out or are attracted to the corruption. Moral men are weakened when the pack is replaced by the biggest pack of all – the military.

Amongst a good sports team in the locker room, one can see a good example for everyone to deal with digs to get tougher. When I captained a gridiron football team, I let most of it go, and gave as good as I got with a smile, yet when anyone started to over-target someone for something personal – from a senior towards a lower year, for an unconstructive reason – I or we as leaders would step in. All it would need was a question to the effect that, so-and-so (the bully) was implying he had never made a mistake that way before. If he persisted beyond this point, then we would bring up his mistakes, others would chime in, and we might all end up laughing – and that would often be the end of that. Or if he was too bitter then a challenge and fight might be needed. Critiquing was never stopped in these situations, but truth and an element of humbleness were applied.

In the female world, these things never lead so far, as words are the preferred method of effete flattery and conflict creation, and often no one is defeated officially – as women adore the victim role and so conflicts never end but fester sometimes for a whole lifetime. You may remain undefeated in your own mind, like these wallflowers, as all people who never really fight for real have nothing settled until the powers that be shut down your SMS. As a result such submissive-aggressive types become weak via this indirect, two-faced, inefficient conflict resolution method. This indirect conflict almost always hinges on complaining to a non-religious authority figure, which is called snitching in the male world, where one gets the label of being a rat. In prison, rats or snitches (along with pedophiles of children) get killed by the other inmates. Like the appeal to teachers instead of handling problems yourself, this is very effete – and males that whine so are called on it historically. These corrupt authority figures become a replacement for mommies, and are why “Karens” act like they do. With boys seldom seeing a male teacher anymore until late high school or university, the female ways become ingrained in many boys.

The Scold’s Bridle

Ever see someone try to be logical with a hysterical Karen? With no ability to give them a reading of the riot act, the hysterical Karen rambles on. In my youth there were some guys that would never shut up, but they would keep meeting someone that would teach them the hard way.

They used to put Shame Masks or Scold’s Bridles (see Further Reading and Watching below) on women whose poisonous personalities would do public harm to a society – as an individual or as a whole with gossip. They could start fights between men leading to death, cause suicides, spread rumours, cause riots, or cause armies to flee from their posts. Now we act as if women’s words are the same as free speech, and not like shouting fire in a theatre. Injustice is being encouraged by the state, as you see with men who fight back against criminal elements in their own home, getting fined or imprisoned for defending their families from home intrusions. The powers that shouldn’t be want double-think, and neurotic women and effete men run amok. They know what they are doing, and if you do not recognise this you are part of the problem.

Normal patriarchal religions would curb this, but the most corrupted churches now deal with super compassion as an end slogan, and most preach feminism too, through a making of the Mother of God (the Theotokos) into a demi-god of sorts, instead of a woman that had never sinned. So these distorted Christian churches are no longer places of repentance and confession, but places for women to empower themselves in status, as they still follow emotive verboseness in following status. When a whore comes to God and changes her ways, God forgives. God’s forgiveness comes from being all-knowing, while the laity are not all-seeing and so must judge you by your fruits. Therefore being a born-again virgin and lecturing others on how they must behave according to your emotive compass, after giving one’s life to God, is not your role – ever. Seeking power through the church and using its forgiveness as a way to clean your slate and start again, to your selfish benefit, is the way of a false Christian.

“Women’s virtue is man’s greatest invention.” – Cornelia Otis Skinner (a woman)

Lounge Lizards and the Red Pill

It is very important to see that winning or bedding females is often not a male skill, but a female one. To win with girls and women you must centre yourself on what makes them happy, and so mimic or trigger their desires. Men who fake this are often resentful of women and jade them afterwards.

A peacock may be beautiful and healthy, but it has gone so far into the world of females it has lost skills of survival as it competes in a fashion show. The fact of the prettiest male peacock getting females does not make the male very masculine, as his focus has been so jeopardised in the efforts to get females he can do little else with his huge useless tail. At the other dysfunctional extreme, male lions force lionesses to bend to their will and even give up their cubs, even though lionesses are far from weak creatures, so we must choose our battles. An Orthodox Christian man should get a woman to follow his lead and take up his theology and philosophical leadership, and in return he can allow her other gifts to comfort herself in her home.

As a human male you may appear successful and win women as a lounge lizard, as you may have good looks, which is a woman’s obsession. You may flatter them, which is a woman’s skill and weakness, and so on. The key is: can you get a woman on your own terms, in the areas that are of greater importance? Can you have them compete for you, as you act like a true male and encourage your woman to impress you by taking on, or supportively teaching, good male skills to her children – keeping all the good female traits in her at the same time? When I moved to a new area in my youth, I returned home from school with an enemy gang in tow, following me to fight as a group (many on one). I was met by my mother at home and she said fight each one in turn, or else. The gang were cowards and, faced with my mother there, I would have beaten each one in turn. They departed in short order. A cowgirl mother is a plus, as is a man who has taken good female skills as his own by thought – and not become a mama’s boy.

If a woman will fight for her child with her life, will exercise to be healthy so she can do her roles in life better, and listen to your instructions in a crisis, she is taking on tomboyish traits – like it or not. Nature is filled with females that abandon their young to live on. If an intruder broke into my house when I was not there, killed my dog, and took my child, and my wife did nothing but scream and ball, I would be very, very disappointed with her and would likely not be able to look at her. Yet if she were killed, beaten, or roughed up some, I would not blame her in the least for not being as good as a man. Still, there are male skills women must take on as best they can, as males have been taking on the elite’s bad female traits, and women have been taking on the elite’s bad male traits. Both must be set right.

Our society fails because mama’s boys are learning to cater to single moms, and then try to cater to women for sex. Others leave the ways of women behind to learn from the local dysfunctional gang or pack, military sergeant, office manager, lounge lizard, or social influencer. None of which will get him anywhere near where he needs to go, as a man must work every day to keep from falling back into the apron strings of his mommy, or the Big Sister State.

It is said more than 80% of female genes have survived from the past, while only about 30% of the male ones have. This is related to studies done by Mark Stoneking’s research. This shows males are not only the newer gender, but the changing one, and so they have been selected by God to conquer problems and adapt, while women seldom change on their own, or change via their males’ genetic influences. In the Bible, Adam came first, and I see that as his mind being made first, as it is his mind that made man what he is, including his soul, and this has changed women to being what they are since God made her. Without the male mind and soul there is just a body weaker than that of a whole host of animals, with little fur and much less physical skill for the vast majority of us anymore. The male mind and soul was made by God, as scans of the human mind taken show it looks very much like those photos taken of the universe, and it is uncanny how much alike they are.

Chivalry’s Sordid Past

Lounge lizards come from chivalry, which came about from troubadours, who arguably originated from a single boy brought up in a castle in Spain, after his father took the castle from a Muslim Moor. There the boy was exposed to a bunch of Muslim women who had not died for their religion, but lived under a Christian lord and his spoiled princely son’s protection. The boy was a disappointment to his father, as he preferred the ways of the harem’s songs and poetry. Later as an older man he toured southern France where his skills were taken up by others like William IX of Aquitaine, who had all the hallmarks of a scoundrel. There were many others to follow, and they all led later to chivalry. Now rescuing pretty maidens in distress on a white horse was to come later, as we have to see things by their roots – which were hardly heroic. The best humorous example of this is Monty Python’s Holy Grail and the Tale of Sir Lancelot, linked in the Further Reading and Watching section below.

These effete singing, dancing, and boozing skills led ladies to violate their vows of chastity and even marriage, which has not been lost on our present world. We are seeing the end result that many generations have failed to acknowledge the true history of things.

Do not be controlled by your dick, for porn is a political weapon. When the Israeli army took over the town of Ramallah, they had all the TV stations play porn 24/7. The population of Ramallah were stuck indoors – like us during Covid-1984 – because there were Israeli snipers shooting anyone on the streets. Porn saps all forms of strength and renders the watcher more and more docile. This is why males have so many insults for masturbators: jack off, wanker, fag, tosser, etc. Whores, sluts, and porn steal men’s energy, health, and thinking, and leave a docile male population of cynical types who rationalise their not doing much of anything. The one issue where men are generally much more emotional than women is sex (and anger), and the system has most men and boys by the short and curlies. That is why porn is free.

Nothing shows women their place than a man who is offered sex by her and turns her down, even when he is not gay and wants it. That man has power, and is in no way comparable to a woman refusing sex. If enough men did so, women would panic today, if the system was not there to give them yet another pathetic crutch to falsely rationalise the fact. Be aware of rejecting a woman, though. I turned down two women at the same time and got booted from their social circle, and there were other ramifications. Women are taught men are a slave to their dicks, and their egos are thus allowed to play the all-knowing type.

Back to chivalry: these men and women of the old French court, or courtesans, wanted to marry into wealth and nobility, and so we are all following the French lounge lizards of their time, where this fashion became all the rage, as the minstrels became versions of the troubadours in every court. Later these minstrels, with their puffy Muslim turbans all fashionably worn in their day, turned into what goes for musicians of today. The goal is still the same: to seduce women by looking fashionable and being hyper-sensitive towards women and girls’ feelings. It must be turned 180 degrees.

We have all become Pepé Le Pews in some measure, trying to meet the whims of a woman whose emotions change her mood from day to day – or even minute to minute. This is why families of the past would choose who their daughters married, as the elite in their world do. Women do not fall in love forever with a person much, as they are in love with love, and that changes. This is why they are so interested in the love affairs of others in books, media, and gossip. One must remember the vast majority of the best poetry, paintings, and statues came from men in love. That is a fact, and so let no woman dictate the ideas of love, for it will be, for many to most, simply her whims played up to be profound.

Summation

So from the history of our pre-civilisation period through the different stages of our theological progression we have advanced towards the creation of our societies through the combination of true Christianity and patriarchy. Resistance from the more primitive ideas centring on matriarchy and androgyny has hampered this growth, but still lays dormant in many of our psyches, and has thus allowed Satan and his Kleptocracy to reintroduce these dysfunctions back into our societies because of our lack of understanding of our true history. Alongside this we have had dysfunctional romantic versions re-enter our cultures, once again without knowing their true origins, and allowed them to undermine the progression to a moral society – often through the arts – and so slowed down or stopped this natural advancement towards a just moral society. The people with a blind will to power have allowed these distortions to linger or progress to allow them their evil desire to be god-like, and to allow for sexual practices and wealth at the expense of their societies as a whole.

Part 3 to follow.

Further Reading & Watching
“Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.” I Corinthians 16:13