How the Kleptocracy Misapplies Biological Experiments
Matriarchal Primate Bonobos Confirm Unwin
As mentioned in Part 2 of “Masculinity Under Attack,” J.D. Unwin went all over the world studying and cataloguing matriarchal cultures (prime examples, but not exclusively, being African and Polynesian), and he found that these matriarchal cultures were less developed culturally and socially.
This is also confirmed by the analysis of Dwarf Bonobo chimpanzees – later found in Africa – that drew in stark contrast to the more patriarchal monkeys Jane Goodall had studied. The Dwarf Bonobo chimpanzees were isolated by the wide Congo River from the other monkeys, along with a wider range of threats they have never had to deal with. In addition these Bonobos were also isolated by the dense jungle, and so had much fewer outside threats and much more branch-swinging to keep away from predators. Both male and female Bonobo dwarf monkeys were smaller and closer in size, as strength had no bearing on the more fruit-centred diet and the much more matriarchal culture. These females were much more ready for sex at all times too, and so sex was used to curb and control unruly males to make them… wait for it… ape simps. No doubt the more peaceful Bonobo monkeys can be pointed to as what happens under female leadership, but when there are fewer threats, a relative overabundance of food, and a kind of luxury to be had (as we find the same in urban corruptions in our human lives) these facts can help things come into focus. Let us look at the details:
“Primatologist Frans de Waal states bonobos are capable of altruism, compassion, empathy, kindness, patience, and sensitivity, and described ‘bonobo society’ as a ‘gynecocracy’ (i.e. a matriarchy)… An analysis of female bonding among wild bonobos by Takeshi Furuichi stresses female sexuality and shows how female bonobos spend much more time in oestrus than other female chimpanzees… Bonobos warn each other of danger less efficiently than chimpanzees in the same situation… Bonobos do not have a defined territory and communities will travel over a wide range. Because of the nomadic nature of the females and evenly distributed food in their environment, males do not gain any obvious advantages by forming alliances with other males, or by defending a home range, as chimpanzees do.” – Wikipedia
So is this social harmony due to matriarchy, or as a result of being sheltered or isolated from dangers, and having a much easier time and larger quantities of food?
Leadership Style
“At the top of the hierarchy is a coalition of high-ranking females and males typically headed by an old, experienced matriarch, who acts as the decision-maker and leader of the group. Female bonobos typically earn their rank through experience, age, and ability to forge alliances with other females in their group, rather than physical intimidation, and top-ranking females will protect immigrant females from male harassment… Aggressive encounters between males and females are rare, and males are tolerant of infants and juveniles. A male derives his status from the status of his mother.” – Note: this corresponds to the shift in humans to androgynous systems of leadership as a step later to patriarchy. “The mother-son bond often stays strong and continues throughout life. While social hierarchies do exist, and although the son of a high-ranking female may outrank a lower female, rank plays a less prominent role than in other primate societies. Relationships between different communities are often positive and affiliative, and bonobos are not a territorial species. Bonobos will also share food with others, even unrelated strangers. Bonobos exhibit paedomorphism (retaining infantile physical characteristics and behaviors).” – Wikipedia
This prolonged infantilism is a result of being sheltered, with a lack of purpose and demands, and by the mimicking of baby features so as to have the advantage of others liking you more and spoiling you. This can be seen in the humans of Far East Asia where cuteness is prized in women over the Diva sexual bombshell stereotype.
Up-Bringing
“Because of the promiscuous mating behaviour of female bonobos, a male cannot be sure which offspring are his – just as Unwin states in human matriarchies. As a result, the entirety of parental care in bonobos is assumed by the mothers… Female bonobos more often than not secure feeding privileges and feed before males do, and although they are rarely successful in one-on-one confrontations with males, a female bonobo with several allies supporting her has extremely high success in monopolizing food sources… Sexual activity generally plays a major role in bonobo society, being used as what some scientists perceive as a greeting, a means of forming social bonds, a means of conflict resolution, and post-conflict reconciliation.” – Wikipedia
It is noted from many historians that societies in decline become obsessed with food, drink, and fashion. It is clear which gender and age group prefers these issues in our society more than the other portions.
Sex
“Bonobos are the only non-human animal to have been observed engaging in tongue kissing… Bonobos do not form ‘permanent monogamous sexual relationships’ with individual partners. They also do not seem to discriminate in their sexual behaviour by sex or age, with the possible exception of abstaining from sexual activity between mothers and their adult sons. When bonobos come upon a new food source or feeding ground, the increased excitement will usually lead to communal sexual activity, presumably decreasing tension and encouraging peaceful feeding (like food and drink are part of human orgies)… More often than the males, female bonobos engage in mutual genital-rubbing behaviour, possibly to bond socially with each other, thus forming a female nucleus of bonobo society. The bonding among females enables them to dominate most of the males… Bonobo clitorises are larger and more externalized than in most mammals.” – Note: thus as clothing designs – high heels, low-cut blouses, high-cut skirts, and thong bathing suits serve the same purpose in humans. – Wikipedia
In these troops of monkeys sex has become a form of emotional currency in the matriarchically led social forms, and this is why pedo sex, homosexual sex, and orgies become more pronounced in matriarchal and androgynous led societies, due to their search to extend and magnify what they preserve as of value. The removal of outward threats, as compared to hyenas’ matriarchal leadership, leads to inward stagnation as female popularity contestants decide leadership via instinct, but also by removing any accountability, as such methods are highly inefficient to change and invent.
What follows next may be less scientific, as instead a backdoor effort to bring in pedo culture with false science. No child will naturally like to be sodomized by large adults:
“Infants are not passive participants. They quite often initiate contacts with both adult males and females, as well as with peers. They have also been shown to be sexually active even in the absence of any stimulation or learning from adults… This suggests female bonobos can have hostile rivalries with each other and a propensity to carry out infanticide… The strategy of bonobo females mating with many males may be a counter-strategy to infanticide because it confuses paternity (or they are just slutty). If male bonobos cannot distinguish their own offspring from others, the incentive for infanticide essentially disappears… Bonobos have been found to be more risk-averse (cowardly) compared to chimpanzees, preferring immediate (infantile), rather than delayed rewards when it comes to foraging. Bonobos also have a weaker spatial memory compared to chimpanzees, with adult bonobos performing comparably to juvenile chimpanzees.” – Wikipedia
Mr. Unwin found in the human populations around the world the same facts, as males would not know who their children were in matriarchal societies, and so male partners would come and go from female-headed households, as such males lost favour – or the males came to see it as time to leave. Too much sex in these tribes meant no reason to use male energy and thinking to create things to gain status, and indirectly get sex. Male energy was lost, as it is with free porn and slutty women today in our societies.
As we see with the free porn industry, males in our own societies become aimless and unhealthy. If winning a woman is a major goal of a male, as it was in Europe, North and South America during the 1800s to 1900s, then men would get to work harder and harder to indirectly get a more ideal woman to marry by fame or by improving their social value. For the Victorian period to work best, such a bride and future wife must assure her husband the children are his, and so the shame of out-of-wedlock births was rightly raised to the maximum. As we can see in our present culture this shame has been reversed, as single mothers are presented as heroines. This is, in fact, the most important aspect of a social system to get males to work their little hearts out to make money by hard work – which is very important to our civilisations – by inventing new things and thinking up ideas that make them look good to all concerned. This matches Christian morality, as now we have science supporting Christianity and God’s morality.
The opposite attitude (by our present culture) is obviously an attempt to make males uncreative, unmotivated, unambitious, and passive towards endlessly moody, status-craving, chad-fixated females craving black triad trait wealth. To not allow males to fairly get wives, and let these females seek a few men of power and corrupt wealth, is a recipe for riots, revolts, and revolutions, which the Kleptocracy likely desires so as to form “Order Out of Chaos.”
So as Mr. Unwin reflects, the English elite tried in the past the best method in deliberately getting males to compete for standing during the Industrial Revolution, but this brought on new problems for those at the top, as they were losing power to the middle class (who then led the lower class) with their new enterprise, invention, and new money. This is when historically you can see the beginning of the Kleptocracy’s attack on the middle class and the divide-and-conquer strategy begin to be used on their own populations – which can be seen in the puppeted communists, covered in “Professionally Orchestrated Riots, Revolts and Revolutions Parts 1 through 4”.
So this new, intentionally created, deformed archaic social order was also learned from the Bonobo monkeys’ matriarchally led troops. All the remaining human and more primitive matriarchally led cultures were all weak and easily taken over by patriarchal ones with the triumph of patriarchy – unless they could be isolated from the more advanced patriarchies. An argument could be made, and I will make it here, that tribes with the most demands that could be managed were the most effective in cultural, religious, and technological ways by the effective use of males. Female orders, even when they were considered magical, maintained leadership by using the males – which I think represents the lions seen in most statues of pre-antiquity.
These hidden facts are why the Deep State has unleashed gynocentrism, matriarchy, and androgyny upon the unsuspecting atheists, solipsists, and heterodox Christians. It must be stated it is not a true form of bottom-up, as it is top-down, selectively applied from the very top, who are almost always all males, and are as patriarchal in their own right, but do not wish competition for power in more direct and noble ways. They want to squash it in the crib, if they can, as they have done so to date in most countries. History shows that such leadership tends to kill their own, as they pose the biggest threat, and so leadership becomes more effete as the powerful centre on killing courtesans and family members over helping a society’s progress.
Despite being male and patriarchal amongst themselves, the Kleptocracy are effete in tactics and strategy as they want to distance themselves from their deeds, have plausible deniability, and use indirect methods (poisons of all kinds) to not be held accountable, like female villains have always preferred in the history books. So they are androgynous in their nature and ways, which may answer why they carry on as they do with little to no benefit to the agenda by being pedos and moral degenerates of all kinds. They will therefore create systems and cults which turn these evils into good or naturally balanced.
World Wars and the Spanish Flu as a Kick-Off of the Effete Culture Creation
The patriarchal societies’ successes could be pointed to show how their cultures had thrived, as up until WWI this was clear. By causing World War I, and the wars to follow, patriarchy was affected in two major ways. One effect was the stronger-minded males were killed off or shell-shocked, thus causing them to be marginalised completely. In addition, patriarchy itself was discredited by the controlled media due to the wars, as to being the superior aspect to culture it was. The elite has thus kept hidden their occult patriarchy for themselves, while the middle class and lower class would have top-down unnaturally created matriarchy to weaken them. The divide-and-conquer of tribes around the world for British Imperial gain has been turned on each country’s own population to depopulate and bring on total technological control.
The agenda can also be seen in when universal suffrage for voting for all males was brought about just after World War I in the UK, as the men returning from the trenches were not so centred on such things – as they sought a comfortable home, relaxed life, and no bombs going off were their simple understandable desires. As an example, look to the WWI veteran J.R.R. Tolkien, who turned his interests to fiction and centred on his love for the British countryside.
Women in England were given the right to vote in the same year as all men (1918), so as to never allow the lower-class males to actually have a time to vote on their own to counter the upper class’s hold when they were fit to stand their ground with their full faculties and wits about them. This is referenced in “The Woman Racket” by Steven Moxon. By getting women into the voting booths, they could cancel out the lower-class males – and started full-force gynocentrism. For those that still hold on to feminist ideas being a natural occurrence, you can note that upper-class women in England were given the vote in local elections before most middle-class and all lower-class men ever were. For an in-depth study of the origins of feminism and how the majority of women strongly opposed it, please read “Occult Feminism” by Rachel Wilson – also available via the YouTube interview linked in the Further Reading and Watching section below.
It is unknown to the vast majority that after referendums were given asking women on whether they wanted the vote, anti-suffragettes won by a wide margin, and so the Kleptocracy pushed for banning women from voting on whether they could vote, and instead pushed for top-down pressure to get men to give women the vote against women’s wishes – likely with their controlled organisations of Freemasonry, Fabianites, etc.
Fears for women are local, not provincial, federal, or international. The media turns further afield dangers into local ones, and so we must always see women as being addicted to micro-pragmatism. Covid would have been just like any other sickness in other lands in some other part of the world, until it showed up in mega-media pushes showing the threats right in their communities, and then hysteria went into action. An unknown dangerous-looking man near the house is worth ten totalitarian states in the bush further away. All the weapons in a home for the right to bear arms, with any man defending his family, can be seen by a nervous ninny as weapons to be turned on her, and so women support gun legislation much less than men. Once the Covid restrictions stopped, you could see who kept the masks on even when they need not do so. I have kept count and it has been 95% women, due to their fear obsession. For them the state has always been able to be made to work for them, by just talking to its reps, that never say anything that shocks women from their comfort zone to get elected. I am sure you have all seen how Karens see authority as if it were on their side. The theme of “kiss up to power and it will always back you up” should be chiselled into women’s tombstones on their epitaphs, when the technocracy does away with birthing mothers for their replacements in test-tube pods.
Our new effete caste system is to make for better bees and ants for the incoming technocratic world state beehive. Bureaucratic positions in this technocracy will be filled by populations that are used to a caste system (like in India), and then later to computers taking over huge swaths of most job positions. Women and effete males will adapt to such abnormal states much more easily, for they are herd-centred and more sheeple-like, and as long as things are emotionally stimulating, they will adapt. The vast majority of women want into the group at all costs, and fear strongly not fitting into cliques, and so these traits will assure most of their compliance. The turning of males into effetes has the same goal: false rationalised compliance.
Fast and Short Life History Strategies – r-selective vs. K-selective
Rabbits in the Empty Valley
“Fast History Strategy” (FHS or r-selective) vs. “Slow History Strategy” (SHS or K-selective) centres on some ideas that can be simplified:
Think of a lush grass-filled valley empty of animals, and along comes some r-selective rabbits, and they promptly breed quickly to in short order fill the valley. This is done by having large litters and having many litters during the year. For this to be done, little time is taken by the parents to bring up the young, and they just let nature decide which survive and carry on their genes. These FHS or r-selective animals need not survive into older ages, because there is little point to do so. It is a rush to get mature fast and reach breeding age fast, and also be healthy and attractive while young, for it carries no advantage into old age. Now there are many species that carry on this trait, but for us here we are dealing with animals and humans.
Humans are part of the SHS or K-selective group, but in reality we can find amongst our own group a tendency to have people with traits that are stronger in both types. SHS centres on slow maturity, and much more energy and time in the bringing up of children, as this group is less centred on an empty valley than that of an already filled valley with many animals, and so competition is involved. So education of the children allows them to succeed in finding mates by being more selective of who they choose to have children with, and so to do this one must have more time and fewer children. This K-selective strategy means slow maturity and therefore a longer period of maturation to being attractive and skilled. This is why children born of people are not standing up within minutes of birth, like most herd animals on the flat lands of the Serengeti. Predators are more K-selected as their young take time to even see, and as anyone who has seen a mother cat get low and move before a pounce, and her kittens then copy her, shows the learning process – as in our phrase “copycat.”
Male Selection and Parental Upbringing
Females are much more prone to SHS in bringing up children, as men are capable of pumping and dumping women all their lives, and thus behaving like a rabbit, and so males are r-selective sexually from pre-civilisation till today in the form of lounge lizards, red pill advocates, or playboys. In the child-rearing of girls, females can often find a male and carry on their genes quite easily, as few are so homely as to not allow them to have children if they want them. For boys it is much harder to find a woman, as women are careful in the selection of a husband and so males need more parental involvement to make the boys more successful. Women are choosy because much of their short to medium future will be tied up with the having of children and nurturing them on their own full time – at least in the past it was.
We must look at the broad scope of these traits, as each person can have different tendencies in each person and ethnic group. Males of high status have a much easier time finding women and have historically had polygamy in a harem form. Scientists have also found good looks to be an r-selective trait, and so good-looking women tend to have slightly more girls and good-looking males tend to also have slightly more girls, as it is a female trait and is extremely important for women to achieve in getting a high-ranking male. For example, blonde hair originally came from women, and is also found more in children before they age. Males are known to become more attractive by a wider range of other skills or traits.
The Kleptocracy distorts these factors by making women r-selective in choosing males via chad looks, distorted culturally glorified fame, and encouraging women to not bring up children in a K-selective manner – by nannies, or a lack of investment in things related to their children’s future – say endless clothes, make-up, cosmetic surgery, and fame-seeking on social media. Most women now hand their children off to daycare, or put them in front of screens. The Kleptocracy have effectively cancelled most natural mothers’ nature to be K-selective or SHS on this score, by magnifying the early, shorter, and low-priority dating portion of their lives into a lifelong pursuit, where even old women get young men to fancy them in Hollywood movie fantasies. The Deep State has also distorted Christianity, so it quietly accepts this unchristian behaviour in its new versions, while homosexuality encourages men to be a different version of lounge lizards by being even more r-selective.
Fathers who have been affected by true religions, honour, and culture have shifted to being more K-selective in bringing up children, and have always been stronger in bringing up boys, yet they have been estranged from their children in the courts (thus lowering the little time they tended to do in the past with girls, and most of all the heavier amount of time they had with boys). Financing has gone from males who have been K-selective with money in recent history, to mothers who have been historically r-selective, except in the Victorian period. A single mother can get money from the state bureaucracy, ex-husband, new boyfriends, her parents and parents-in-law, and friends with the excess use of tears and pleading. This is, in fact, more than an average single man can compete with.
FHS or r-selective males tend to get involved with gambling to earn money faster, and so often are unable to win a more K-selective wife, but at present males that are risk-takers have been given the image of a bad boy and hold an attractiveness for women. The world stock markets have been turning more and more into gambling-like avenues for decades. So once again unnatural dysfunctions run rampant. Males in the ghettos of the world resort to selling drugs, because it is fast money and women want to choose successful sure things – males that are wealthy right now – as waiting until a young man finishes a lot of education and earns a position in a company over many years is now not at all appealing to them. Hypergamy means waiting at the finish line of the male race to be chosen from amongst all the other women that feel they are a prize.
So by unsettling the natural tendencies, and the religious and cultural influences, there has been a general sweeping turn to the r-selective or Fast Historical Strategy. This is no fluke, as history has shown that when normal society decays there are changes to these dysfunctions that balance it out, but in our present history there have been no natural flips, but broad-based turns of both male and female in a direction that has never been seen before. For example in an economic depression, women would get smarter about the kind of males (as they would see poverty right in front of them), and is why many males go to poorer regions of the world where they can find a pretty poor woman who is much more wise to a nice guy who is responsible. These poor women know of many males in their own communities with FHS, and when they meet a SHS male they go about appealing to them in natural feminine ways.
Young males have naturally been more centred historically to r-selective traits in their youth, as girls mature sooner, but due to the present distorted media push for “women to have it all” the gap has been filled. We have young males starting to take on K-selective or SHS traits without religious influence. This has been fully against the Kleptocracy media push, as they prefer gurus, fads, and trends that are very appealing to females’ and effetes’ emotions.
We had the push of Playboy in the 50s, then the free love of the 60s, then lounge lizard and frat boy culture in the 80s, 90s, and early 2000s, and now we have it on its last legs with Red Pill rebranding and doubling down on the lounge lizard ways of getting sex with no cost. Cost is not to be selfishly avoided, but spent in finding a good woman by not wasting one’s time with media-driven themes of corruption.
Our societies are not an empty valley with green grasslands and no predators – they are not a Disneyland or shopping mall of easy choices that will come just by following the herd. They are highly competitive, and boys must not only deal with this anti-male biased world, but get their girlfriends and wives to go K-selective or SHS as much as they can. This is an extremely hard thing to do as women are emotively plugged into the decadent culture. These lessons cannot come from a part-time social influencer or Red Pill lounge lizard, but a tuned-in father who has his act together. To be so means to have the True God on his side of a competitive culture and a full understanding of the intentional destruction that is unnaturally occurring all around him.
The Home
Why would a single mother allow a boy to play computer games all day, but not allow a man to control more of the home and deal with the boy more effectively? It is the fearful need to control, and have emotions rule the home, that is key to women feeling comfortable by husbands following their whims. The wilful energy to force the boy off the computer game is only made harder due to fathers being out of the home, whether working too much, or having fled from the dysfunctional emotive leadership of the mother, or been kicked out with the full support of the bureaucracy and her big sister state apparatus. If the father has had the same upbringing by a single mother, he may be spoiled too, and want to play and watch porn too much. This system perpetuates itself and leads to depopulation of all kinds.
A man that is a lounge lizard, that counts scores of women as an end goal, is not far from the homosexual promiscuous lifestyle, who also screws for numbers. The bodies of such males are geared toward production of sperm and to succeed by r-selection methods over K-selection methods. R-selected is more primitive and herbivorous. Real men think long term and see further ahead, and want the best women, so will therefore make women compete for him. There is no rule from God or nature that says a man must chase a woman, for in this skill the traditional female position is the stronger, and as a man you should take the stronger ground. You should also judge these pursuing women as carefully as a woman did in the same position in the past, for both of your futures depends on it. Women have stupidly given up this position, as they act like weak males in sleeping with many, as if for the first time they have been given a buffet of choices and want to try a little of everything. This is followed by rooster-like male bragging by women who want a “6 foot, 6 abs, 6 figure male” to cover over the fact that she has been jaded by the top 1% of males that can have sex with almost any pretty woman, but does not want to marry her.
With these traditional female skills being used by a strong male, we can see beyond the old culture to a new one. Your selection in mates will help your children and your happiness, as you take the strong matriarchal ones in addition to strong patriarchal ones that complement.
Their Weakness
The rich have tended to not bring up their boys and left them to others to deal with, which is again r-selected and not the best policy, and was really about wanting to play more than work. When it comes to work there was a famous meeting in England on how to deal with the rising Germany before WWI, but instead of competing with the German system of production the lazier option was chosen – to live off compound interest rates and parasitically feed off the population through so much taxation that there was never enough money to get ahead in life by the middle and lower classes. When the pill was introduced the WASP elite suffered more than the Catholics, Orthodox, and Muslims to this very day. Their reaction is to not have and bring up more children better, but to try and kill everyone else’s children by endless evil tactics. As you can see, r-selective traits run in elite circle rationalisations, and one can imagine they hope to test-tube future children as they are for nature over nurture (r-selective). If one were to see openly how they bring up their children we would all be aghast, but be assured that it is FHS, as torture uses fear to create focus and regurgitative behaviour best.
Homosexuals call us “breeders,” and it is mostly true, and until you have a boy to bring up, your stupid ideas can go unchallenged. With a son you will have to evaluate your own ideas or fail, and so there is zero need to eat crow in front of others as a single childless male, as much will change in your outlook as you mature, or fail, in your efforts to pass on skills. Do not let gay men prey on boys, as they do not make full men, as it is an exchange and not a full platonic unselfish act. Your children are to be given things with very little in return in equal measure to you. The generosity and love is passed on. Making deals is what is done with those outside the family, and is done within the family as a last resort, not a first resort.
Calhoun’s Rat Heaven
For the third section of this article I would like to look at the experiments done by John Calhoun. What was done with huge numbers of rats in a small cubicle-like city has been applied to us in our human experiment cities. In his work Mr. Calhoun brings up Thomas Malthus (the darling of the Kleptocracy) in his paper (see Further Reading and Watching below), which shows he was either funded or hoped to be funded by the usual suspects. The supposed issue of concern for Thomas Malthus was overpopulation, and his numbers read like the climate alarmists that have all been proven to be wrong. Malthus was correct in an increase of people – hardly much deep thought for his time – yet was totally wrong in how food production would match and even excel past the increase in population, thus rendering his apocalyptic visions all wrong. The Kleptocracy never really has any hard-core beliefs, aside from wanting more power and wealth for itself, as an easy solution to overpopulation was to match the tax system to how many children a family has. That way the greed of selfish people could be used to lower the population, but the elite prefers emotional and sycophantic people that Satan also prefers. How could selective taxation be rationalised? Well that is not hard, as permanent bachelors and bachelorettes do not need schools, playgrounds, and a host of other targeted things society creates for children, that fairly should not be funded by those who will not use them. Therefore they need not be taxed the same. People that hide or claim to have not fathered a child could be discovered and held accountable with a reimposition of the accumulated avoided taxes to that point, seized passports, and even jail time where they could work to pay the outstanding amount – with the added bonus of being made to give time to the children they fathered as well. All this could have saved the whole assortment of evil corrupt methods that have been used, if depopulation was the Kleptocrats’ true goal.
So this leads us to the results of the Mouse Heaven Experiments by Calhoun and how those in power have used its results, with Unwin’s work, the Bonobo studies, and the K-select/r-select work covered above, all in an agenda that has a lot more mixed in that we may not have even discovered.
The Mouse Heaven had a set of cubicles that had all the food, drink, and comforts any rat would likely find more than adequate, compared to some slummy alleyway with garbage to feed on. There was always more than enough food and drink, and the target was to see how overpopulation would affect this mouse world.
There were different stages that the population of rats went through. At first there developed territories and habits that seem similar to those outside this man-made constructed world. Yet as time went on there developed three general kinds of males. Simp male mice that never fought other mice, even when attacked. Short-fused males that fought at the drop of a hat. And what we can call alpha males – the largest – who picked and chose when to fight, and these alpha males had many females they protected in a small section of the cubicles, providing a calming space. The fighting of the males centred on biting each other’s tail, which involved a lack of face-to-face direct combat, as striking with less chance to be bitten back came the method du jour of male conflict. Compare that to some deer that lock horns face-to-face and so build the strength of the herd with no assured death of combatants, allowing the herd to still defend itself with better trained males.
The females later came to abandon their babies, had natural abortions of their babies (as they were often gang raped by males when the females were in their cycle, leading to health complications – unless they were part of an alpha harem). Then there was the females’ actual killing of their own young and that of even other females’ young. This last part was likely done in the absence of the neighbouring female, when she went for food and drink. We can also see this in our women who sing the praises of abortion – as they are in fact killing rival children, or as the saying goes, “misery loves company.” Males would also kill the young, but it is the female side that goes against our understanding of matriarchal nature. Stress, whether admitted or denied, brings on unforeseen traits that lie in wait for many that do not want to compare people to animals. This kind of denial does not want to hold women to the greatest genocide in world history – I speak of the abortion genocide.
As things got socially deformed further in the rat city, sex with other males, babies, and of course females became commonplace.
As this progressed to further stages there developed sneaky males – cuttlefish or squid-like male rats – who would act like stalkers, awaiting at the top of bridges, and flee from a dominant male and avoid eye contact with them (as if the alpha males were acting as police), but when a female would leave for food and drink these sneaky males would then stalk her and roughly assault her, which led to unguarded females getting the worst of it. Male rats in their natural habitat would await a female outside of her hole or space, and then a ritual dance of mating would happen if she was interested. In the rat heaven complex these sneaky males would barge into the female space, rape her, kill any babies, and then cannibalize the dead babies. Females would also take part in the cannibalising of other children too. This seems odd with unlimited food available, yes?
The final stage of the 1968 rat heaven experimental colony was a stage of the “beautiful ones” where the rats would not mate at all, and groom themselves endlessly, as they ate, drank, and groomed themselves obsessively. They would avoid conflicts and endlessly focus on their appearance.
This brings us right up to date, as presently we are seeing “looksmaxxing” – male influencers that spend all their time and money on making their looks better. Of course there is make-up, cosmetic surgery, and a host of ways that one can do to make oneself more appealing to women. As with all such promoted individuals (by the establishment) they are given passive girl sidekicks that look longingly at these effete males and listen to their advice so as to even change their own looks for them. Having other women around you is known to attract women to you, as women prefer such males. Likewise gullible men see pretty women and so latch on to male looksmaxxing gurus too, so as to hopefully be like them. The Further Reading and Watching section below links to an Orthodox priest, Father Moses, commenting on this social dysfunction, as only a greater faith can deal with such an evil use of manipulation veiled in crass form with their biological backing that most are not even aware of.
This has not been lost on some powerful countries of the world, as we have the Chinese Government ending boy toy groups and TV drama males, who have been removed in total, with the justification given in translated form from Chinese characters as such man/boys being called “sissy boys.” Korean K-Pop groups are still with us today, and of course Korean dramas are found all over Asia, with these males being called “Kkonminam” or “beautiful boys” – yet these could be found in history as they were called “Hwarang” in the past, which roughly translates as “flowered youth.” Not to be outdone, in Japan there are J-Pop groups galore and lots of trendy dramas too, with the term used to describe them as “Bishounen” or “androgynous beings,” which was originally used in animation (anime) where the characters were described as having purity, innocence, and were extremely polite. They were always situated with a flowered background in the cartoon, with effete sounds to match, and girls swooning over them. This has also been referenced in Japanese books that speak of “herbivore males.” All these effete males are made out to be fashionable, instead of an artificially created culture. It has been commented that the whole glorification of music and dance groups was created to help deal with the large numbers of unemployed males, as replacement methods of success through zones of almost always dead ends. 99% of those seeking fame in music, dance, and acting fail. Did you really think girls screaming for rock stars would not affect young men?
There has been further historical roots to this in the study of matriarchal and androgenic cults, as worshippers of the goddess Cybele and her son Attis had priests that copied Attis in self-castrating themselves and wore dresses, make-up, long hair, and jewellery – and were all the rage of women in antiquity, despite being unable to have sex with any of them. This has deep roots, as do gay hairdressers, and stems from women preferring for most of their monthly cycle the company of women, as real men can make them feel uncomfortable.
Real men behave in a way women do not understand, nor make any real effort to truly understand. Aside from a strong father who, from a young daughter’s earliest upbringing, goes about showing his daughter how men are and keeps hammering it into her that she cannot emote her way out of these facts – then she may come to understand men. Yet if this man’s wife has any say in this very important lesson, she will no doubt limit this and want a softening of the facts of life, and thus indirectly steer the girl to her emotions as the way to deal with life and men. There is some need in women to turn men effete that is as strong as the nesting instinct where a home must take on things just so – or the woman will not feel good and thus sulk, pout, and complain. In Victorian England (and other Commonwealth countries) it was also a habit of mothers to dress their sons up in girl clothes and take their pictures, as one can see in many family albums. This remains in our time when we see boys dressed by their mothers, as the look is usually softly androgynous. This alludes to the same thing found in pets with many useful skills being turned into cute big-eyed, spoilt creatures that hog the sofa, beg for food, and have well-groomed fur and lace trappings of some sort.
I watched a Russian experiment that tried to turn wild foxes into less aggressive creatures to make using their fur easier to manufacture. In the end this failed, as the foxes got friendlier and friendlier – they also lost their ideal fur and became more like the pet dogs we already know of in many a home today, that have lost all their former traits or skills.
Social Engineering to Cause Dysfunction
I am sure you can see from these three studies and investigations the agenda underway in housing, with the odd form of owning a condo or flat as a replacement for a home with a yard and a community. The 15-minute city is also a sign of this agenda as you will be forced to stay in a confined space, and fined for going outside of your virtual cage. This can be seen in other forms that will not be apparent at first glance. I went to an elementary school (K through 6 grade) that was an open-area school, with no walls separating any of the classrooms. Now one would think that this would remove the confines of a small classroom with a group of children, but what in fact happened was this one huge open space had 12 classes of roughly 300 students all in one huge area – thus mimicking the rat heaven in so much going on at all times. Add to this almost all the teachers being female, as pointed out in our three-part series on “The Destruction of Education A to Z“, and one sees the agenda even clearer.
Putting people into cubicles was likely part of the learned method, so as to cause more isolation, where socialising is made less common, as does people working from home during the Covid-1984 event, which caused many mental issues as they were depersonalised. At one’s job you are under stress from bosses and deadlines, and so the small space was only part of the effects. It would be better to use the visually ugly Bauhaus-styled buildings, with their many windows to best effect, so that people could face out windows to see the sky or greenery, if there is any to see in the new cityscape. Isolation can take this form as much as being crammed into overpopulated spaces, where you know no one and there are risks in such urban environments to mingle, as the result of the same lack of comforting social interaction with familiars and family. All big cities have this result where people want to be left alone, and people come and go so that you do not get to know anyone. This is the same as the suburbs, which were designed to break up the ethnic neighbourhoods where everyone was much more friendly and belonged to the same big community. In my suburb, each home in our section had at least three or four families come and go, which assured no multi-generational community.
This is worst for those with no family, or family that is distant, or pursuing their own lives selfishly. All these rat-like effects in our world lead to more and more selfish effects, as we have our own over-grooming beautiful ones, where the endless selfish behaviour brings on more of the same behaviour in others. In human terms these would be reflected in our DINKs (double income no kids) types.
Those lost behind a screen and crammed with media events, scrolling and flashing items rabidly coming and going, of course bring on the same effect – as despite being by yourself in real isolation you seem stressed and overwhelmed. Anyone dealing with a child that has played games all day will see the skittish behaviour for what it is, and the fact that Apple Computer’s founder Steve Jobs never allowed his children to use smartphones, and sent his children to schools without computers, should get the picture – unless you are thick.
After WWII there was an excess of jobs and prosperity that led to the Me Generation, which shows what the watchers of Rat Heaven learned as well. The free love, cheap drugs, lazy attire, proud selfishness (doing your own thing), which included heretical guru-led faiths and distorting of the religions of all kinds, led to a future of more rat-recorded results.
As you can see there has been a huge effort to make people feel and falsely think they are like animals. They have distorted science to fit many narratives, and at the same time tried to undermine true Christianity. This has come out in a new book named “The Primate Myth” by Jonathan Leaf, which shows in great detail how humans do not belong in the primate category. The interview on Mr. Leaf’s book is linked in the Further Reading and Watching section below.
In the end the Kleptocracy wants us behaving more like animals so we are emotively easier to manipulate. Resistance to all the biological methods mentioned in this article and others has been widespread, but it is important for us to see what they are up to, and so understand how they want to make us into animals in their eyes – and in each other’s eyes.