Young Europe, Young Men & Universal Male Suffrage
After The French Revolution – Recapping Part 1: The Congress of Vienna, 1814-1815
The Congress of Vienna (1814-1815) marked the close of the French Revolutionary period, as England had bitten off more than it had bargained for and would need to study how to orchestrate revolutions more effectively before undertaking them again. The Congress was chaired by the Austrian statesman Klemens von Metternich. With France humbled and riddled by internal conflict, the way was clear for the later creation of a puppet regime in France, which occurred after many sidetracks under Napoleon III. At the Congress of Vienna, the Rothschilds and the English Kleptocracy sought to lay the groundwork for a system (like the later European Union) with no deep Christian basis beyond likely superficial religious trappings. This was stopped by Tsar Alexander I, who tried to form an agreement among the Christian countries of Europe. The Rothschilds swore revenge and later funded many terrorist groups in Russia, including the successful assassination of Czar Alexander II, and of course, the later Russian Communist Revolution, in which the entire Czarist family was murdered. The Czarist martyred family are now saints in the Russian Eastern Orthodox Church, and thus the church, along with good views of the Czarist family, has outlived Russian communism, while in Eastern Europe today, communist parties are now being banned from elections. In the end, God’s church survived, and communism did not, for it was God’s will.
The Young Europe Revolts, Rebellions, and Revolutions of 1848-1849
By the 1840s, the British Kleptocracy had greater control over secret societies abroad and was ready to begin undermining its imagined enemies in mainland Europe, leading to the chaos of 1848-1849. The causes in each country or nationality group varied, as the Kleptocracy’s handlers promised everything to everybody to ensure the chaos that followed. So if you read the revisionist history of this time, you supposedly get some men wanting liberal principles and the doing away of the monarchy, etc. This is not true for most. For example, in Germany, the Kaiser moved the movement toward pan-Germanism, as most citizens were not in favour of the ideas later presented in many history books. One should see that unemployed young men will revolt or rebel for a number of reasons when they have no stake in the system around them. You would be wise to remember this when our present economic system collapse occurs, likely somewhat hidden by world war and any number of distractions.
More than 50 European countries were affected in 1848-49. Radical political organisations were illegal, unlike today, when there are approved radical organisations funded by people like Soros. Many of these attempts to organise were unsuccessful in taking control of government, but they still delayed countries’ economic, political, and social progress, as reactionaries would take over for a short time, and time and money would instead go to security. The best example of this, which occurred just after the 1848-49 revolts, was the assassination of Czar Alexander II (1818-1881), a reformer, whose death led to a retreat from reforms. Alexander II emancipated serfs across the Russian Empire. Alexander’s reign brought several other liberal reforms, such as improving the judicial system, relaxing media censorship, eliminating some legal restrictions on Jews, abolishing corporal punishment, promoting local self-government, strengthening the Imperial Russian Army and the Imperial Russian Navy, modernising and expanding schools and universities, and diversifying the Russian economy. As you can see, these steps were all good, even given the endless grievances of the worst Jews who used usurious loan-sharking rates and other mafia-like methods of earning wealth. Unfortunately, the strengthening of Russia was not what the British government wanted, so the killing of the best reformer since Peter the Great was a must. If the British elite and Jewish elite truly cared for the Jews found in the Pale of Settlement in Russia, they would have supported Alexander II instead of indirectly funding and orchestrating his and other good leaders’ assassinations in Russia. To repeat, the reaction of Alexander II’s sons and the landed gentry was to pull back the reforms and step up security. If the Jews wanted more rights, they should have turned in their members of the nihilist terrorist organisations, supported the reforming Czar, and publicly mourned and privately pushed for another Czar like Alexander II. Instead, they did none of these things. When the Russian serfs learned that many of those who had killed Alexander II were atheistic Jews, they had pogroms. The Jews then played the victim in the media around the world, and the old Polish or Russian saying was reaffirmed: “A Jew always tells you what happened to him, but never tells you why.”
The String Pullers
During this period of history, there was less delegation of leadership to underlings to undermine other states, so it was the job of Lord Palmerston, in his many ministerial hats across British departments in the government’s cabinet, or as Prime Minister himself, to be the main Satanic corruptor of men. He worked in many ways to sell opium to China, waged war with China to sell opium, and got American bankster allies (those who later became the US Blue Blood families of the Northeast) to help run opium to China via their privateer ships, to give the British government plausible deniability in its role as a drug pusher. He also helped finance Young Europe (which we are focusing on in this article) and a host of other efforts, only lesser noted but not of lesser importance, and any number of underhanded schemes all over the globe. He had ties to the British Admiralty when he was younger, which later became the root of MI6, MI5, the CIA/OSS, etc., and even switched political parties (Conservative, Whig, and Liberal) as Winston Churchill would later do. Due to the British government’s actions and the infamy it accumulated, an effort was organised to move this evil corruption further underground and closer to Satan himself. The British establishment, and their American lackeys, moved their media to discredit independent journalists of this time in the US by calling them Muckrakers, though in fact the top brand of this mixed bag of journalists were much more independent at this time compared to today.
Gustavus Myers – an American investigative writer whose real magnum opus was exposing the unlimited corruption of financial elites, not the bigotry work his name is now pushed forward for – shone the most in this period and shed much light on all the Anglo-American corruption. His works of note are listed in the Further Reading and Watching section below.
The Young Europe organisations were key to the unrest that followed in Europe, as was the influence of Giuseppe Mazzini – the Italian nationalist and revolutionary who served as head of World Freemasonry – and several Carbonarist societies led by Louis Auguste Blanqui, the French radical organiser who spent nearly half his life in prison for insurrectionary activity. The gift to these forces was the unification of Italy for the first time since the Roman Empire and the expulsion of Catholic Austria from Catholic Italy. Yet, just as with communism, the money had to come from somewhere, as a Europe-wide series of organised violent outbreaks required large sums. These groups needed printing presses, paper (not cheap then), weapons, explosives, bribes, full-time activists, and a whole assortment of things that mostly unemployed members could ill afford. Paying dues could not cover these revolt tools and the other, more formal needs of such organisations on their own. In fact, money should have gone to the poor to help unemployed men retrain for other work, not the other way around. So instead, we had Banksters, centred mainly in the UK, funding Giuseppe Mazzini and others. How do I know this for certain? Well, why did these unfortunate outbreaks never hit the UK? They also had a lesser effect in France, where Napoleon III was widely seen as a British puppet, given that he lived in England and was on the British payroll while there, while other Rothschilds ruled the Bank of France and were to fund new wars with Germany. This was also the case with Mussolini in Fascist Italy before WWII. The UK government was immune to these effects because it knew they were coming and used its media outlets to discredit the homegrown Young Britain. It would arrive later in WWII, when it could again help those in power rather than help remove them. Most importantly, the British Freemasons were on board to quell such radical ideas. All this political mischief cannot be defended against unless you are prepared for its coming. I also have the history of my own family when they lived in the UK, and we were involved when the government moved to take over paper mills to thus control newsprint and books. They used selective enforcement of laws to squeeze out businesses not members of the cabal. In the end, no one will be allowed to run a business unless they have ties to the Kleptocracy.
These European youth organisations included the Young Germans (Junges Europa), Young Italians (Giovine Europa), Young Poles (Mloda Europa), Young France (helped Napoleon III), Young Ireland, Young Bosnia, Young Czechs, Young Finns, Young Latvians, Young Ottomans (later Young Turks/jews), Young Romanians, Young Slovenes, Young Switzerland, Young Ukraine, and even Young Wales.
There was also a Young America group, but the same forces were later used in the much larger effort to cause the US Civil War, which began just over 10 years later. The Russians were aware of Britain’s influence in their troubles, as they were pressured to adopt a central bank modelled on the Rothschilds’ system. This alertness to British efforts to use secret societies, banking, and corporate power would help cause the US Civil War, but it did not escape the Russians’ understanding. This is why Britain and its puppet Napoleon III were warned that war with Russia would ensue if they used troops from Canada (for the British) and troops from Mexico (occupied by France at the time) to join the South in permanently dividing the US into North and South. The large Russian fleet toured American ports at this time to make it plain that the Russians were serious. At the time, Alaska belonged to Russia, so troops could be moved against Western Canada, as Russians would find Canadian winters tame and not an obstacle, unlike those for other countries.
The Smoking Gun
Now, for the smoking gun proof, we must look to the tendency of those in power to pre-program the public about what is to happen in the future. There are many reasons for this, but for now, let us look at who made the prediction before it happened. Benjamin Disraeli, who was to become the first Jewish Prime Minister of Britain, wrote a novel titled “Coningsby” before the 1848-49 revolts, likely named after a member of his family at the time, that tells a story that can be seen as a not-so-hidden way of showing how Jews control the world. The character Sidonia, whom most scholars identify as Lionel de Rothschild – the British banker and parliamentarian who was the first Jewish member of the House of Commons – asks in the novel who runs the world. What is most important to this article is that, in the novel, he foretells that those in power in England will soon unleash revolts and rebellions in mainland Europe, as the novel is set in 1840. The first edition of the novel was published in 1844, and so we can see in this novel a plan in the works from both the Jews and the British establishment to cause the 1848-49 chaos, as depicted in the novel 4-8 years before it happened. One can read this book and see its fortune-telling, or more likely, inside knowledge. As was to be done in the future in movies, we have the intentional use of fiction to tell us non-fiction. An inversion of ideas to give it plausible deniability.
Bern, Switzerland – The Revolutionary’s Safe Harbour
The headquarters of most of these Young Europe Societies were in Switzerland, where many of the future exiled communists would be based before efforts to overthrow the Russian Czar and other rulers around the world. These revolutionaries often travelled from Switzerland to points around the world, as many have noted that the early Freemasons and Knights Templars set up shop there. The key question, with a Young Switzerland being a supposed thorn in the Swiss authorities’ side, stirring up mob violence, was why the Swiss government would allow all these headquarters of all these Young Europe movements to be located in their country under their noses, and do so again much later by allowing all the communists to live, work, and cause revolutions from Switzerland. Unless, of course, they were up to their necks in the undermining of other countries. When the communists later had their headquarters in Switzerland, one has to ask why a democratic state like Switzerland would want organisations bent on the overthrow of other democratic states, including Switzerland, when the communists were sworn to overthrow Western governments (by any means necessary). The revolts of 1848-49 can be attributed to national factors that did not involve Switzerland, but the later communist movements in Switzerland cannot be so easily dismissed. Here we have both democratic England and democratic Switzerland behaving like democratic Athens in antiquity, in so being the cause of unrest at unheard-of levels of ambition, and not the stabilising force for peace, trade, and justice now falsely proclaimed in our history. Like the Venetian Republic, the democratic surface simply hid a bankster cabal bent on destroying economic rivals of any sort, like they had in destroying the Byzantine Orthodox Christian capital of Constantinople, which allowed the Ottomans to come in to finish the Eastern Church off after the stab in the back from fellow Christian banksters from Venice, or their nom de plume as the Black Nobility.
That said, Switzerland is landlocked, so for these clandestine elements to travel around the world, corruption in their neighbours was needed, most often in revolutionary France and Italy. The point of this history lesson is that those we are dealing with are completely unscrupulous in how they get young men into a passionate state to do their bidding and undermine states in various ways, and how our unemployed men are bound to react in the future, 2026 onward, when the Great Economic Reset happens. Likely with wars aplenty to distract most from the Greatest Depression. Men today are unable to find a wife, get a living-wage job, and have been raised by single mothers who lead with emotions and are bound not to think straight about whom to follow. The computer fighting games are bound to warm young men to seek power in the US military roles that will be on offer, though they will be nothing like the first-person action games they are accustomed to, as dropping bombs from drones on civilians will not match the heroes of the games they play. If we include the estrogen mimickers found in the environment and the efforts of our establishments to create the toxic masculinity agenda, one can surmise that emotional men are what they want and intend to get. One of the biggest roadblocks to this is the Eastern Orthodox Church, which, like Russia during the British-Rothschilds-orchestrated first US Civil War, may be a force of God to stop these Satanically led cabals.
At the political level in 1848-49, the UK Kleptocrats were able to use the unemployed better in mainland countries, or the underemployed young men, because free trade in the UK was now undercutting other nations’ production. The defeat of Napoleon I allowed the opening of trade with mainland Europe, which Napoleon I had cut off. Young men with no future flocked to secret societies at this time because they offered advantages in gaining employment, power, and wealth. These same functions are available even now, but there has been a shift, as these evil forces are in control of government institutions, so secret societies, like the Freemasons, are of lesser importance. The Kleptocracy has enough people for all its positions, so there is an excess of hangers-on. The goal now is depopulation and turning men into either unofficial eunuchs through chemical castration or through mental castration. If you find this far-fetched, then look around at those men actually self-castrating and at those single mothers castrating their sons, and then think again. All aspects of our present society are about suppressing boys and young men, because they are the only real threat. Emotionally disturbed boys are known to self-destruct and end up working in prison factories or hooked on drugs. So any issue that can keep males out of the cabal’s hair is of paramount importance, and North America is the most important region of all because the men are armed and wise to what has been done to them by the original British-led Kleptocracy.
The Long History of Targeting Young Men for Manipulation
All revolutions, revolts, riots, and union strikes have been led exclusively by men, or by men with women only in support. Setting aside the Amazons, which I will cover another time, as they reflect women’s modus operandi of indirect conflict only, we are left with the Kleptocracy’s fixation on getting men to do as they are puppeteered, or on marginalising them so they cannot interfere with their plans. In that effort, we see the Jesuits using confession to work this to their advantage in the past, as Jules Michelet – the 19th-century French historian and author of the landmark work “Du pretre, de la femme, de la famille” (1845) – observed:
“A great attempt to fasten on the man through the women and on the women through the child.”
Then there is the former Jesuit-school-educated and first head of the Illuminati, Adam Weishaupt:
“There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.” – Adam Weishaupt
The Illuminists used a sort of confession with new members that was likely less in-depth than the one used by the modern-day Church of Scientology or CIA-like services, to understand how to manipulate their members. Freud and all his first Jewish shrinks used the same replacement for godly confession as a way to profit from people having difficulty with sins. Because Protestants had no confession, these Jews lined their pockets and later leaked patient information to outside sources for a price.
Adam Weishaupt’s quote (stated above) was made prior to the French Revolution, so by 1848-49 you can be sure they had come to grips with how to use women to manipulate men, as already covered in using female meat butchers to start the French Revolution in Part 1 and in making a symbolic statue of reason a woman in the revolutionary parliament of France. This was also used in pagan cults from antiquity, as Athena had many names for the goddess of reason, and “Shakespeare” was a euphemism for “Shake-a-Spear.” Athena was represented by this phase and showed that the real Shakespeare was a Rosicrucian.
The main, semi-natural, universal push among women would have been to get men to earn more money, which would later lead to consumerism. Greater goals would have to wait, as getting anything in bits and bites would be easier than tackling larger issues that could lead to a whole slew of reforms for the better. This led to modest requests from unions, which were often crushed when they came forth in Northern England during the Industrial Revolution. Later, the totalitarian communist movement would undermine the more modest, suffering socialism that had long existed, centred on a living wage. This split the married, moderate working class from the single, working-class radicals. This will be covered in more detail in Part 3.
Universal Male Suffrage and the WWI Trap
The Men’s Universal Suffrage Movement, to secure the right to vote for all men, came only in England just prior to WWI. Before that, wealthy women had the vote in local elections, while all men lacked it. When all men finally got the vote, they soon found themselves fighting in Europe in WWI, so they had much more on their minds than keeping abreast of the details of politics. When they returned from WWI, many who had not lost limbs, weren’t shell-shocked, or were not disfigured or crippled, could hardly be too concerned with voting. Most wanted to forget the war and thus focused on anything that kept them from the blood, guts, mud, and other horrible conditions. Those on the home front during the war had to support the war and thus the political party running it, as the call to loyalty and support for their men fighting is always very strong. A campaign was organised by those in power to have young women hand out white feathers to men who had not enlisted, so as to follow Adam Weishaupt’s stated goal or idea in thus calling these men cowards for not fighting in Europe. I am sure that if there is a World War III, the Tranz supporters will be called on to shame men into fighting, as they will not measure up to the task of equality in real terms themselves. Likely, the state will have a counter-Tranz movement that suppresses the weak Tranz movement, so men will feel they are born again, given military jobs, wealth, and the right to suppress their former oppressors at the pragmatic local level, but not much higher. To see this in action, just look at the muppets in the UK police as they carry out two-tier law enforcement. This is why you see so much effort to encourage a white pride replacement movement over a true religious resurgence, as those in power have dealt many times with white or gay pride movements – as I will cover in Part 4.
What is often overlooked is that women were granted the vote not long after WWI. So there was never a real time for all men to vote on laws without the pressure of war, and once women got the vote, emotional campaigns could sway women and emotional men to oppose the more thoughtful men on policy, and thus cancel out the formerly disenfranchised men who were still healthy. All this in the short window of time prior to World War II, when the whole patriotism call for unity would be called on yet again. After 2 world wars and the Spanish Flu, which culled the numbers of men, many women would do an about-face and start to marry men who did not go to the war. There was also an increase in out-of-wedlock children. Those in power know that war allows them to do their agenda much faster, and so we have countless claims to a “war on drugs,” etc.
Conclusion
We can see the steps taken, and the learning curve at play here, and what must be understood is that the Kleptocrats have used women and handicapped men, and even weaponised vaccines before (the Spanish Flu and Polio), since as early as the late 1700s. We cannot suffer fools gladly, even now, to reinvent the wheel by saying these tools are merely recent instruments of corruption. In the past, the facts were more plainly found, for the Kleptocrats were not as wise in hiding such evidence. It is the pull of fashion over history that leaves us trying to make each action taken by the Cabal seem only a recent action, so as to soothe those who still want a way to see things as not so bad. Their interest in fashion and drama is a major problem in itself, for, at present, things can be hidden by the short attention spans that keeping up with fashionable news items causes. Instead, we must bring history back to men, a history that was either distorted at the very outset by those in power with the funds to publish books, or later by those who did revisionism on their behalf.
We must also accept that men are under attack and are the primary target to be led astray into useless actions or passivity. We must become brothers to our fellow good men worthy of our effort, and not spend all our time on Jezebels with nice faces, tears of self-pity, and endless efforts to gain attention or play the victim in their own created psychodramas. I think the saying, “sin a lot, repent a lot,” best describes many false Christian women. Women’s sins are often smaller in scope than the big picture, but they are more plentiful in number.
“If a person says he has faith, but he gives no outward evidence of that faith through righteous works, his faith will not justify him.” – James 2:24