The Orchestrated Creation of Totalitarianism
What Totalitarianism Actually Is
If we look at the worst dictators in history, from Genghis Khan and Chinese emperors to Ivan the Terrible, Attila the Hun, or any of the Roman Empire’s corrupt pagan Caesars, we never see full totalitarianism in any history books. Most stayed away from religion and focused on forcing peasants to pay taxes or work their fields. Others, like Mohammed, King David, and some Christian kings, were religious but not especially harsh on taxes or on individual families for their time. Yes, if you were in their way, they might do things that one might feel make little difference to those under totalitarian states, but it was never everyone at the bottom level of such regimes who suffered; only those who met a dictator on the warpath or were unaware that they were in the firing line on some issue. Even as slaves, one could do one’s duties and escape the worst of one’s situation. Totalitarianism comes from total control, and that is a modern concept that can be seen in communism and fascism, and in the growing system being created around us today. Were communism and fascism natural grassroots ideas, or were they created top-down? Let’s look at the first version of communism, as National Socialism (the Nazis) is just a different version of socialism/communism. A citizen couldn’t care less if a government controls every aspect of their lives, or a monopolist/oligarchical system that controls every aspect of their lives. If it is a totalitarian technocracy that uses social points to indirectly and slowly penalise the things you are doing against the whims of the total control freak state, that leads to your ultimate loss of all rights to free speech, food, private property, and faith – most care not the left/right division. It also matters not whether it is done slowly or subtly through soft power; the result is still totalitarianism. To those suffering, these differences are of little consequence and secondary to the total lack of meaningful freedom.
A) Engels & Marx
Friedrich Engels, the quieter half of the Marx/Engels tag team, came from a family with extensive banking interests and was the main source of funding for Marx and totalitarian communism in the early years. Marx, on the other hand, had less to do with the works attributed to his authorship than with serving as a lightning rod or a needed figurehead of communism. Marx’s lifestyle was shaped by his main UK handler, David Urquhart – a British diplomat and agent of the Foreign Office who served as the key go-between linking Marx to the kleptocratic cabal – and who was likely the main conduit between politicians and their street-level assets. The British Prime Minister Palmerston was the cabal’s leader in government circles, while David Urquhart was a key figure in efforts to distance politicians from agents like Karl Marx. Freemasons were getting an even worse reputation than they had ever before in the US. In the United States, an Anti-Masonic Party (1820s to 1830s) was created, as the Federalist Party had flopped as an obvious elite’s effort. Yet the Anti-Masonic Party was eventually subverted and later had a name change. That name change was the Republican Party, but please note that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans ever like to mention this.
Presently, in our own day, a police leader in the UK has claimed that all British policemen should bear some mark that they are Freemasons, as the two-tier policing is sending the public into revolt (see Further Reading and Watching below). As we can see, both then and now, the Kleptocracy saw a need to distance itself from its decadent ways and evil actions. For example, at this time, it became plain to the world that the British Government was a drug pusher of opium in China, India, and other locations, as covered in Part 2.
Karl Marx’s sexual perversions and Urquhart’s corruption can be found in almost any profile of him, but even this pales in comparison to Urquhart’s mentor and educator, Jeremy Bentham – the English philosopher and founder of utilitarianism, whose influence on radical political thought in the 19th century has never been properly reckoned with. Bentham’s debauchery and evil are second only to the demons under Satan himself, as Bentham was likely the root of Aleister Crowley’s satanic ways. This all started further back in the UK, at least in a formal way, with the Hell Fire Club, a place that Benjamin Franklin visited in his masonic efforts.
Karl Marx’s satanic poem is called “The Fiddler,” so someone might rightly connect this title to the Jewish musical and movie “Fiddler on the Roof,” in that it reflects Jewish life of dancing and playing, with the appearance of all fun, on a very unstable platform, and the need to carry on in a very morally dubious way despite the dangers. Many to most Jews in finance have always, directly or indirectly, loaned money at loan-shark rates of usury, and/or had fellow Jews they knew involved in prostitution rings, as Jews were involved in the white slavery trade and the regular slave trade from its inception, for no other reason than its profits and pleasures. In Eastern Europe, some Jews had cornered the market in cheap booze like vodka, and in all other underworld professions, at least one Jewish group was present in each large city, including the USA, but these facts have been suppressed. Please read “Super Mob” by Gus Russo – an investigative account of organised crime’s deep ties to American political and corporate power – and/or “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit” by E. Michael Jones – a densely sourced history of Jewish radicalism and its relationship to Western revolutionary movements – to see the scale and history of its control and how these underworld Jews created Hollywood at the orders of the Kleptocracy. It is thus not hard to imagine someone like Marx moving from this world of fiddling with women and funds to the world of secret societies, in an attempt to distort the workers’ movement from its hard-won advances into a totalitarian, world-revolutionary mode, and to create the second half of a Hegelian Dialectic to balance with “State-Sponsored Usury” (labelled falsely and sold as “capitalism”). Those true believers on both sides of this Overton Window can feel uncomfortable with this Marxist poem’s section below.
“…Till heart’s bewitched, till senses reel: With Satan I have struck my deal. He chalks the signs, beats time for me, I play the death march fast and free…“
Karl Marx’s personal history is the very opposite of that of a friend of workers. As a glutton, he was a black hole for money, which is very much what one would connect with a cliché of a Jew. Marx’s extramarital affairs, out-of-wedlock pregnancies, and endless boozing are not hidden in his official bios, but they are sold to us as “Ok” because of his famous work and supposed concern for the workers of the world.
As with Switzerland, Marx lived part of his life and died in England. Marx and Engels had their books translated into English later so that these ideas could be propagated to Britain’s enemies first. All this time, he was in England and somehow survived despite having no book sales in English. Somehow, he was allowed to receive the proceeds from sales of his books abroad, sent to him in Jolly Old England via banks, or he had deeper pockets. So, like Napoleon III, he was to receive income from his British handlers to finance translations of his books. Most likely, these books were sold through intermediaries by Freemasons and Illuminists, as the Fabianites did not form until later. As mentioned, Leon Trotsky was a Freemason before he was a Communist, as he himself proclaimed in his own book, and so this is hardly debatable. When Fabianism was first created and throughout its life, it attracted members of the aforementioned organisations and, in its early days, a few naïve do-gooder women. Feminism was in its early stages, yet had already been misdirected via upper-class women “in the know” as to its real purpose. In the case of the Illuminati, Fabianism likely supplanted the Illuminati organisation altogether and has only recently emerged in Hollywood circles to stir the pot, distract the public, and draw conspiracy theorists away from other organisations covered in these articles that are much more important. Now, most people connect the Illuminati with decadent Hollywood sexual practices. With Hollywood on its way out, we should note that the Illuminati’s most important lessons were in their first creation of what the Church of Scientology (CIA front) now uses in their questionnaires and interview system, which has its roots in the distorted use of confession by the Jesuits.
Hollywood has lost its shine, and its film production is shifting to private companies, which are harder to question because they are fully in private hands. With “Deep Fake” tech taking over whole swaths of art, expect many artists to be on the breadlines soon, so expect most to cave to any agenda they are given, of course, minus their principles of being an artist. Movies with an agenda can now be streamed via Netflix, Google, and YouTube-like services to people with little else to do, to those who are not allowed to do anything else (shut-ins), or during new lockdowns. They have a captive audience now, as few people have enough money to do much of anything else.
Back to the 3 Stooges (Marx, Engels, and Trotsky)
Please remember that both these characters (Marx and Engels) were from German-speaking nations that were being bad-mouthed by the English-speaking press at the time, and we were shortly to have 2 world wars with these nations. Yet despite all this, the authors’ work from these countries was neither marginalised nor taken with a huge grain of salt; it caught on! There were many authors from friendly countries and other English-speaking countries who could have been promoted instead, with more moderate, better-thought-out, non-totalitarian solutions. Also, there had been strong censorship in England since the time of King Henry VIII, but not in this case of world revolution, where someone was advocating the destruction of democracy, capitalism, and the monarchy by any means necessary. I guess the police didn’t know where Marx was for all his years in England. As of today, there is a two-tier set of rules in England for who gets censored. Those who were moderate and constructive needed to be silenced by controlling the press and printing houses, while others advocating revolutions by force of arms seem to have gotten their messages out to parts of the world via British shipping. Surely Marx could have had an accident or gotten alcohol poisoning, as we know the British government had poisoned Napoleon I and likely killed millions of Chinese and Indians via the effects of opium or heroin.
What motivation would the Kleptocracy have for this? Well, to undermine all other nations, whether they had good industrial worker relations or were moving toward better ones. If the nations around England had tariffs to protect the development of their industries, England’s Kleptocracy would not have been able to sell its “paying below a living wage” products abroad under the false ideal of Free Trade. This was necessary, mostly at this time, in the economic nations of the United States and Russia. So totalitarian communism completely overwhelmed the democratic unionisation and charity coordination efforts of moderate voices, as single men with radical, impatient natures would follow the trail hammered out for them by the hidden hands, which you can see in photos of Marx, with a hand under his vest (and in this header of this article). Now we have famous stars covering one eye in photoshoots, and before Marx’s time, painted portraits had people with fingers distorted into position to form an “M” (Mason), like one must do to make the Vulcan gesture in Star Trek, which we later learned is, in fact, a secret Jewish gesture made by Rabbis.
Marx was not a man who cared for the poor. He did not save his pennies to help his fellow working class, and he would not curtail or limit his lusts so as not to leave working-class women barefoot, pregnant, and destitute. I am astonished that his lifestyle and trail of ruined lives are never critiqued to better understand the man behind the movement. The reason for this is quite obvious. He had strong PR at the time, with the British Government and the Freemasons on his side, and everyone debating his ideas promoted him as a star while ignoring his lifestyle. The idea of good press or bad press was used here, as many who attacked him were doing so, just like Jordan Peterson today. Karl Marx was able to steal the limelight from other, more reasonable, more responsible, and truer defenders of the working class.
B) Leon Trotsky
This issue is close to my heart. When I was just out of high school and dealing with leftists of many stripes, I fell into the black hole of Leon Trotsky. I read Trotsky’s own book (“My Life” by Trotsky) to find that he was a Freemason before he was a communist. Far and away, the fact that changed my life was that Leon Trotsky was driven around in a chauffeured limousine in the USA, given a US passport, with the blessing and support of Woodrow Wilson, and stayed in air-conditioned hotel rooms (when only the elite had such luxuries at that time). How Trotsky also met with CEOs and bank chairmen for intense meetings seems unbelievable until one sees many sources from the time stating it. As bad as this was, a bolt of lightning hit me when I read how a ship was filled with communists who had gold, weapons, and other needed goods to start revolutions, left the US (after Trotsky’s stay), and was captured by the Canadian Navy. At this time, Canada was fighting WWI, and everyone knew that allowing these communists to go to Russia could take the largest allied army in the world out of the very war Canadians were fighting in the brutal, bloody trenches.
The Canadian Navy had not received the secret society memo and so disembarked the entire ship in Halifax, Canada, and put all the communists in prisons and camps, as there were so many of them in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and the location lacked the proper accommodation for such vast numbers. Here, what was to happen next left me speechless and certainly broke my normie worldview, as the then Prime Minister of Canada, Sir Robert Laird Borden (a Conservative, to boot), was contacted by US President Woodrow Wilson and the Prime Minister of England, David Lloyd George (a Liberal), and told to release all the communists, specifically Leon Trotsky, and their gold and their weapons, put them back on their ship, and send them back off on their way to Russia, via British waters, to do as everyone thought and take Russia out of the war.
It really bears repeating: the then Prime Minister of Canada, Sir Robert Laird Borden (a Conservative), was contacted by US President Woodrow Wilson and by the Prime Minister of England, David Lloyd George (a Liberal), and told to release all the communists, specifically Leon Trotsky, along with their gold and weapons, put them on their ship, and send them back on their way to Russia, via British waters, to do as everyone thought and take Russia out of the war.
This was with the Canadian army fighting, being maimed and killed in Europe, as the US had not yet joined the Great War to end all wars (or so they sold it back then). I do not know how anyone could not be enraged by this in the English-speaking world, and so when the Canadians of our present generation seem passive in the face of this injustice, I am less surprised, as I have seen blank indifference to these facts on Canadians’ faces. This was my 9/11 moment, or my Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq moment, or my Covid moment, or any number of the growing list of evils that have led to little logical reaction to the supposed facts. I, like other such awakened people, would go around telling others what happened during the First World War, with our Canadian boys fighting over there, and would get the same sheeple replies of indifference. After a time, I stopped pressing and became more selective about whom I would bring these facts up with. Simply, I learned that so many people do not care. As found in the Milgram Experiments at Yale – the landmark 1960s obedience studies in which ordinary people administered what they believed to be painful electric shocks when instructed to do so by an authority figure – 67% of people do not care about others when an authority figure tells them to commit evil acts. I then proceeded to cater my actions to these facts and danced to a very different tune in my life, one that others found impractical. Recent events have shown that my decisions were correct in spades, and the pragmatic people who have simply gone along to get along and trust authority figures (who have lied to them again and again) are now starting to fear and feel the pain of such poorly given trust. What I discovered in my soul-searching about why people who can think could commit this denial was also a watershed moment. I realised the reason unchristian sheeple trusted those in power (that usually were lying to them) was and is because a large portion of intelligent sheeple lie to themselves and others, and so do not want others cutting them off too. “He is without sin, cast the first stone,” does not fit here. Out of fear of being shunned themselves, they will not risk the intolerant behaviour coming down on them, as they fear isolation. The Nazis’ Joseph Goebbels is quoted as saying something related to this in his assertion that “the common man does and accepts small and medium lies, but finds large and huge lies unbelievable, and so will fall for them.” If so, in this way, these public pragmatists have no right to object to anything that they are bound to have suffered in the past or will shortly with the Great Taking or Great Reset, as most of these people have done smaller sins, with no repentance or feeling of guilt themselves, and cannot complain when the powerful just do “larger sins” and “great evil” only in scope or size, as they have done the same but in a lower scale or frame.
Only by following the true Trinitarian Christian God can one avoid being so hypocritical and suffering after death. As it seems, some are going to suffer horrendously before they get there. Indifference and pragmatism do not pay, as you lose in 2 ways: your soul and your peace of mind.
C) Distancing the Undermining of Other States from Freemasonry and Parliaments
The Fabian Society
Prior to the US Civil War, WWI, and WWII, there was a need to distance Freemasons and other secret societies from Marxist totalitarian communism, and so “Fabianism” was created. We should note that Fabianism was a test case and a run-through of all such organisations that would be formed in the future. To understand its purpose is to understand all such false creations that claim to be grassroots groups for the people. The modern term for this con game is “astroturfing,” which refers to fake grassroots movements. Communism relied on true-blue, impatient, emotional males to fill its ranks, while Fabianism was started by upper-class elites who pretended to go slumming to become members of a society of friends of the poor. By doing so, there was never a need to rein in hot heads, as from its inception, the group was run by the Kleptocracy. By doing this, they save time and aggro. Here is the most recent version of elite children leading causes for the poor in politics (see Further Reading and Watching below).
Some Fabianites reached the highest levels of government as socialism became more popular. They included Prime Minister Tony Blair, El Comandante Fidel Castro, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau (who was a draft dodger during WWII), and Premier René Lévesque of Quebec. In each case, these leaders diverted grassroots desires into ideas the NWO wanted. Then there are Maud Pember Reeves (Fabian and feminist), Martha Beatrice Webb (Fabian and feminist), H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Emmeline Pankhurst (Fabian and feminist), Prime Minister Clement Richard Attlee of the Labour Party, Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald of the Labour Party, Prime Minister Tony Blair of the Labour Party, Bertrand Arthur William Russell, Annie Besant (Fabian and feminist), and E. Nesbit (Fabian and feminist).
When the Fabianites first started, they focused on literature, as that was the best way to turn people to the dark side at the time. They later moved into all forms of media and art, and from there even into politics, riding the wave of good publicity, backed by the machine of propaganda, wealth, and power behind the scenes. The vast majority of these creatures came from very rich families and had royal links of one sort or another. It reminds me how odd it was that so many major musicians in the hippie era came from military, espionage, and diplomatic backgrounds, and it seems to be the preferred means to start a Hegelian Dialectic by enlisting members of the Kleptocracy families to get ahead in the hierarchy, in some cases by throwing their children into the mouth of Moloch. As the Carthaginians demanded that their top families sacrifice their firstborns, we have the continuation of the ways of the Phoenician merchant classes in the Kleptocracy.
The Fabianites have two representations of themselves, one being “a wolf in sheep’s clothing” and the other a tortoise, with their slow, gradual moves toward world totalitarian government. Their name comes from the Roman general Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, who was the only Roman general to have handled Hannibal to that point in the history of Rome. Fabius realised no one could defeat Hannibal in direct confrontation, and only through the effete or woman’s way of indirect conflict could he and Rome defeat Hannibal. In this way, the Fabianites, in their slow, indirect war of effete whispers, lies, and poisonings, make war on the world, once they realised that direct communist world revolution would not work. Too many workers wanted a living wage and liked their nations. Thus nationalism would need to be discredited as well, turning healthy nationalism into unhealthy fascism, as is in store for us under Trump and the next ignoring-democracy leaders. Thus, the need for the other half of the dialectic to be discredited, and so the later hyper-nationalism of fascist totalitarianism.
The Pilgrim Society
This organisation was created to bring together the English and American Kleptocracies after they finally joined forces. Although it is said to be a goodwill society, it is in fact very powerful and has many functions not openly stated in its charter. There are also Round Tables in each Commonwealth country, and the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) is in the US, both national organisations meant to bring leaders in each nation into sync with the program. The Pilgrim Society is higher-ranking than the CFR, but it receives less attention in many conspiracy circles.
The Rhodes Trust
Here, the Kleptocracy simply finds the most blindly ambitious, sycophantic young people who will answer, “How high?” when asked to jump, or who will regurgitate the ideas of the Kleptocracy in each country. President Clinton is an example. My son was asked by a Church of Scientology member to join, but I warned him to stay clear beforehand. Eventually, like Freemasonry, if one has skills, on top of the other already listed moral flaws, one can be placed in the proper higher education facilities and taught to come on board and be functionaries in the new technocracy of the Kleptocracy, if any potential candidates do not bow out and crash out after hearing about the culling planned.
The Trotskyites
After Leon Trotsky (the hand-picked pretender to the throne of Soviet Russia, chosen by the Kleptocracy) lost out for power in Soviet Russia to Joseph Stalin, Trotsky was first exiled and eventually, in Mexico, Stalin had one of his operatives drive an ice pick through his head. Stalin was called a Napoleon, for he, too, gave up world revolution for nationalistic control in one country. This is referenced in the book “Animal Farm” by George Orwell, where the head pig is called Napoleon, while the Trotsky character (Snowball) in “Animal Farm” gets a good frame, despite Trotsky being a butcher of men, women, and children and a slaughterer of Orthodox Churches, nuns, and priests. So George Orwell might have been either doing the bidding of the Kleptocracy, and/or a member of the Trotskyites himself, or simply flattered them to keep his life by making Snowball a victim. Here is how Snowball is described in the Wikipedia entry for “Animal Farm”:
“Snowball is a character in George Orwell’s 1945 novella Animal Farm. He is largely based on Leon Trotsky, who led the opposition to Joseph Stalin (Napoleon). Snowball is depicted as an intellectual pig whose leadership, dedication, and feats for Animal Farm are unparalleled by any others on the farm.”
So the revision of the elite’s pick distorted Trotsky’s portrayal, even in their own books, to make him look good, even though by that point, he had lost power. At that time, Trotsky had killed more people than anyone else, and if he had taken power, he might have done even worse than Stalin. Before losing power, Trotsky, after signing the WWI peace treaty with Germany, let loose communist revolutions in Eastern Europe (and later in Germany), just as was done in Part 2 of this series in the Revolts of 1848-49. Hungarian communism was the best example of their intent, with brutal trains travelling the country, executing people, and tossing them off the moving trains. It also included the first efforts to sexualise children’s education, which brought a swift reaction once the population got wind of what real communism meant.
The Trotskyites would be transformed into “the Neocons” to carry out their task in a different way. The Kleptocracy was still trying to reinvigorate Trotsky, after an attempt to paint him as Che Guevara, a martyr for communism, which goes on to this very day. If it had worked, we would have had capitalist t-shirts for this Leon communist, atheistic Jew as well. The goal of distancing those in power from their underhanded deeds was nearly a waste of time for some 50 years. The main theme of communism was world revolution, and since Stalin was only interested in perfecting communism in his own country and those in Russia’s immediate orbit, the plan left a great number of Trotskyites nowhere near the inside of power to do the most harm.
So those in the Kleptocracy decided to turn the Trotskyites into Jewish Neo-Cons who would push the US into wars all over the world to accomplish the same agenda that World Revolution from the left was meant to do. Once again, this action would hold back other nations’ economic progress and more, as they would become reactionary to the communist threat. At the same time, they would need to meet threats with more totalitarian policies in their own countries to match the communist ones. Through war, the American and British Kleptocracy had learned that war was the fastest way to get the changes they wanted, as discovered in the investigation of the non-profit organisations in the Norman Dodd Report to the Reece Committee in 1950 (see Further Reading and Watching below).
According to the Chicago School of Economics, former Trotskyites abandoned communism for capitalism, which allowed war to be waged under the Neocon label, opposed to real-deal paleo conservatism. So riots, revolts, and revolutions could get underway under the cover of the sheepskin of democracy, capitalism, anti-communism, and freedom of speech. The wolf under the sheepskin would be kleptocratic totalitarianism, technocracy, and a move from free enterprise to oligarchical enterprise, finally arriving at monopolistic mercantilism through a slow, torturous process. With increasingly complex tax forms, laws that handcuff small businesses, the deadly low-cost pricing of multinationals, and the selective enforcement of endless laws, they have destroyed free enterprise. The Neocon wars went from wars against communism to wars for the state of Israel, with the recent being Venezuela and the next likely Iran, which might result in World War III.
The World Wars – Destroying 5 Rivals in 2 World Wars
Austria-Hungary
For some period of history, Austria-Hungary was in the crosshairs of the British Kleptocracy because it was already a multi-ethnic empire, like Russia. Instead of serving as a model for tolerance, which is now so harangued by the talking heads and high-level UN and EU elites, it was targeted for destruction by getting its minorities to undermine its state. This shows that our immigration policy was, in actuality, the same game, used then as now, to undermine the leading majority so as to make the cornerstone of leadership and tolerance give up on the process. The very young males who are impatient, emotional, and prone to violent actions have been imported into Western nations to ensure that any resistance will be less thoughtful than in the past.
The Habsburgs’ leadership had been a dominant force in resisting Napoleon I and in bringing stability to Europe through ethnic and religious tolerance. Clearly, this runs counter to the narrative of England as a force for peace, justice, and culture. Like Russia, Austria was undermined because it was reforming itself so correctly. England’s real leadership was not merely about keeping the continent divided for its own success, but also about working behind the scenes to sow chaos and bankruptcy among those who did not bow to its hidden cabal. The first step in destroying Austria was to prevent the Catholic countries from uniting, and the revolts of 1848-49 drove Austria out of Italy, as Napoleon I had done in the late 1700s.
Russia
There is also the question of why Lenin and Trotsky handed over all their Russian gold to their Western backers instead of using it for the workers after they gained power. They could have double-crossed the Western elements that financed their successful overthrow of Russia, but they knew these powers could get them killed quite easily. This tells the tale of why Stalin was so paranoid when he went against the Cabal’s plan for world revolution and opted for only national revolution, and why he had to run purges of party leaders to stop him from being assassinated. Lenin had many attempts on his life, and this left him, before his death, with a satanic look on his face. Yet it was during the Russian Civil War, when Western forces landed at key Russian ports, that the final demand for all the valuables was made. If the Bolsheviks had not ponied up, the Western armies would have joined the Whites for real and crushed the Reds and Greens. The Bolsheviks did give them all their valuables at that time, and so the Western armies left, leaving behind a wish list of arms, food, spies, supplies of all sorts, and a money line that would send funds only if the Bolsheviks followed the Kleptocracy’s instructions.
As we can see today, with the rise of gold and silver, despite the official talking heads of the economic system calling them a useless relic, these metals have now reached levels unseen before, so one cannot trust anything they say.
Germany
In the book “Hidden History of WWI” – the meticulously sourced account by Scottish researchers Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor tracing British elite responsibility for engineering the conditions of the First World War – you can learn about the many attempts the Allies orchestrated to get Germany into a world war before the assassination of the Austro-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife. There were efforts in the Balkans and Morocco that showed the Kaiser was actually a restraining influence, helping to avoid war. Again, it was the British, using the revenge-seeking French, who were unhappy after the loss in the Franco-Prussian War and the loss of Alsace-Lorraine. Napoleon III, at the behest of the UK (his paymaster), had started that war as well.
The most devastating book on this subject, though, came from a British diplomat and naval officer after WWI. In the book titled “The Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918)” – published in London by Williams and Norgate in 1923, written by Rear Admiral M.W.W.P. Consett, who served as Naval Attaché in Scandinavia from 1912 to 1919 and as Naval Adviser to the Supreme Council in 1920 – the truth completely comes out. The book is filled with key, detailed statistics on how key products flowed into the neutral countries and were then traded to the Central Powers during the war. Rear Admiral Consett shows that without the British Navy allowing neutral countries to receive and trade with the Germans through the blockade, from certain British Commonwealth nations, North and South America, and other non-European sources (that the leaders of Britain knew were being traded in certain key products, beyond each neutral population’s needs), the First World War would not have gone beyond a year. These products, such as animal fats, were essential for the production of artillery shells, bullets, and a host of other armaments and machine maintenance. In WWII, the same situation occurred, as the Nazis did not have enough oil and were given an American invention to turn coal into fuel, which allowed the Nazis to act and made the Nazis feel that the British and American elites wanted the Germans to put an end to the communist menace, as why else would they have given them all the tech they did to get them ready to fight as well as they did. It is only the pure ignorance of the Western population about the necessary materials and technology needed to wage war that allowed them to see Nazi aggression for what it wasn’t. Germany, the Kleptocracy thought, had not been destroyed enough in WWI, as the fighting had been done in France and Russia, and so the war reparations, the Great Depression, and Trotsky-led revolutions in Eastern Europe and Germany were meant to cause a radical military faction to seize the country with secret Western governmental support in tech and financing.
It is even worse, as there was a new low in modern warfare, with the British Navy’s blockade at the time, which resulted in millions of deaths. So we have the satanic killing of people through starvation and the intentional allowing of products to keep the machines of war going in enemy countries, as you are waging war against that nation and letting your young men die for a false cause. When I read this book, the idea that the Spanish Flu was a fluke in killing more people than WWI came to mind after our Covid scam. Family kin who fought in WWI in my home country often died, or passed the Spanish Flu to others, as it has been traced to the Doughboys from America who were mass vaccinated in preparation for going overseas. This was beyond the pale for most to accept, no matter what the facts presented revealed, but since the latest Covid scam, it is no longer beyond the vision of most people who see their government as the enemy. There is also the Polio Vaccine that came after DDT had caused the disease, as the Polio Vaccine then went on to kill and harm more people. Facts like the Raggedy Ann Dolls were given to people who had donated to the parent and independent charity that argued that the Polio Vaccine had caused polio in children and people, not the official narrative.
So Germany would have had to surrender within a year, unless the British allowed selective use of the blockade to keep things going. In fact, as stated in Consett’s book, representatives of Germany during the war came to England for dinners to hammer out issues of this dysfunction, as the flower of British Commonwealth youth were dying in the trenches. Surely a devil’s feast.
China
Premier Mao Zedong was a Yale graduate of the Shanghai, China, branch – the Yale-in-China programme, a missionary and educational venture that served as a significant point of American cultural penetration into Chinese intellectual life – and was part of a Hegelian Dialectic. The Japanese invasion of China was intended to undermine the Chinese nationalists, who were briefly forced to ally with the communists, were supported in a limited way, and had their gold stolen when they fled to Taiwan. Same song and dance.
Japan
Japan had been a UK proxy since the Meiji Era. The Japanese nationalists were a destabilising force, and so the UK-aligned industry and Freemason elements pushed for actions that would do the bidding of the Kleptocracy. The first of these efforts was the Russo-Japanese War, where England financed the modernisation of the Japanese Navy, and the army was first made like the French, but later adjusted to follow German methods. Japan would have been wiser not to go so far into China in its series of wars with that nation, to instead capture the oil fields in Dutch Indonesia and Malaysia, and also to take Hong Kong, Singapore, and Macao only. Then it could have claimed to be the true liberator of Asia from Western colonial rule. With only key locations in Northeast China, it would have had more than enough men to defend against the Soviet Union if it invaded. Instead, it got into a huge land war in China and took on the USA as directed. Japan should have taken on the UK and the Dutch and made further incursions into China only if necessary. The Japanese controlled all of Manchuria and other parts of Northeast China and could have maintained the peace treaty, as China was in a civil war that the Japanese could have prolonged by funding factions to ensure no one won.
It is not widely known that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were among the most Christian cities in Japan, and that both had expelled Freemason lodges first, with other cities following suit. That is the reason they were nuked. Kobe was a major manufacturing region, but, like some factories in Germany, it was left alone because it was owned by hidden Japanese allies of the West, who were to take over Japan and lead the economic miracle with their industries, which seemed to escape bombing.
Conclusion
It was British and later American banking interests that financed world communism, as the dues from members of all communist and socialist parties and organisations were nowhere near the funds needed to finance the billions required to cause the political turmoil of the 19th and early 20th centuries. One need only read any number of books to see the proof; the best are listed in the Further Reading and Watching section below.